Dr. med.--obsolete? A cross sectional survey to investigate the perception and acceptance of the German medical degree.

GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung Pub Date : 2014-08-15 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma000922
Xenia Heun, Christian Eisenlöffel, Bastian Barann, Brigitte Müller-Hilke
{"title":"Dr. med.--obsolete? A cross sectional survey to investigate the perception and acceptance of the German medical degree.","authors":"Xenia Heun,&nbsp;Christian Eisenlöffel,&nbsp;Bastian Barann,&nbsp;Brigitte Müller-Hilke","doi":"10.3205/zma000922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To obtain the German Medical Degree \"Dr.med.\" candidates are required to write a scientific thesis which is usually accomplished during Medical school education. This extra work load for the students amongst a lack of standardization and an M.D. awarded upon graduation in other European and Anglo-Saxon countries leads repeatedly to criticism of the German system. However, a systematic survey on the perception and acceptance of the German doctoral thesis among those affected is overdue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an online questionnaire, medical students as well as licensed doctors were asked for the status of their medical degree, their motivation, personal benefit, time and effort, scientific output, its meaningfulness and alternatives concerning their thesis. Patients were asked, how important they value their general practitioner's title \"Dr. med.\". The resulting data were evaluated performing basic statistic analyses.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>The title \"Dr. med.\" does not seem to be obsolete, but there is room for improvement. The scientific output is good and only a mere 15.1% of the candidates do not publish their results at all. Moreover, while at an early stage motivation, appreciation and recognition of personal benefits from the medical degree are considered as independent aspects, they merge to a general view at later stages. The current practice is considered most meaningful by the ones who have already finished their thesis. However, there are discrepancies between the expected and the actual length as well as the type of the thesis indicating that mentoring and educational advertising need improvement. As for the patients, their educational level seems to correlate with the significance attributed to the title \"Dr. med.\" held by their physician.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"31 3","pages":"Doc30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000922","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: To obtain the German Medical Degree "Dr.med." candidates are required to write a scientific thesis which is usually accomplished during Medical school education. This extra work load for the students amongst a lack of standardization and an M.D. awarded upon graduation in other European and Anglo-Saxon countries leads repeatedly to criticism of the German system. However, a systematic survey on the perception and acceptance of the German doctoral thesis among those affected is overdue.

Methods: Using an online questionnaire, medical students as well as licensed doctors were asked for the status of their medical degree, their motivation, personal benefit, time and effort, scientific output, its meaningfulness and alternatives concerning their thesis. Patients were asked, how important they value their general practitioner's title "Dr. med.". The resulting data were evaluated performing basic statistic analyses.

Results and conclusions: The title "Dr. med." does not seem to be obsolete, but there is room for improvement. The scientific output is good and only a mere 15.1% of the candidates do not publish their results at all. Moreover, while at an early stage motivation, appreciation and recognition of personal benefits from the medical degree are considered as independent aspects, they merge to a general view at later stages. The current practice is considered most meaningful by the ones who have already finished their thesis. However, there are discrepancies between the expected and the actual length as well as the type of the thesis indicating that mentoring and educational advertising need improvement. As for the patients, their educational level seems to correlate with the significance attributed to the title "Dr. med." held by their physician.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
med.博士——过时了吗?横断面调查调查的看法和接受德国医学学位。
目的:为了获得德国医学学位“Dr.med”,候选人需要写一篇科学论文,这通常是在医学院教育期间完成的。由于缺乏标准化,再加上在其他欧洲和盎格鲁-撒克逊国家毕业后获得医学博士学位,学生们的额外工作量不断增加,导致德国的教育体系不断受到批评。然而,对那些受影响的人对德国博士论文的看法和接受程度进行系统调查是迟来的。方法:采用在线问卷调查的方式,对医学生和执业医师的学位现状、动机、个人利益、时间和精力、论文产出、意义和替代方案等进行调查。患者被问及他们对全科医生头衔“医学博士”的重视程度。对所得数据进行基本统计分析。结果和结论:“医学博士”这个头衔似乎并没有过时,但仍有改进的余地。科学产出很好,只有15.1%的候选人根本不发表他们的结果。此外,虽然在早期阶段,动机、对医学学位个人利益的欣赏和认识被认为是独立的方面,但在后期阶段,它们合并为一个总体观点。那些已经完成论文的人认为目前的做法最有意义。然而,论文的预期长度和实际长度以及论文的类型都存在差异,这表明指导和教育广告需要改进。至于患者,他们的教育水平似乎与他们的医生所持有的“医学博士”头衔的重要性相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
8th meeting of the medical assessment consortium UCAN: "Collaborative Perspectives for Competency-based and Quality-assured Medical Assessment". Influence of a revision course and the gender of examiners on the grades of the final ENT exam--a retrospective review of 3961 exams. The Final Oral/Practical State Examination at Freiburg Medical Faculty in 2012--Analysis of grading to test quality assurance. The new final Clinical Skills examination in human medicine in Switzerland: Essential steps of exam development, implementation and evaluation, and central insights from the perspective of the national Working Group. Electronic acquisition of OSCE performance using tablets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1