The new final Clinical Skills examination in human medicine in Switzerland: Essential steps of exam development, implementation and evaluation, and central insights from the perspective of the national Working Group.

GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung Pub Date : 2015-10-15 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma000982
Christoph Berendonk, Christian Schirlo, Gianmarco Balestra, Raphael Bonvin, Sabine Feller, Philippe Huber, Ernst Jünger, Matteo Monti, Kai Schnabel, Christine Beyeler, Sissel Guttormsen, Sören Huwendiek
{"title":"The new final Clinical Skills examination in human medicine in Switzerland: Essential steps of exam development, implementation and evaluation, and central insights from the perspective of the national Working Group.","authors":"Christoph Berendonk,&nbsp;Christian Schirlo,&nbsp;Gianmarco Balestra,&nbsp;Raphael Bonvin,&nbsp;Sabine Feller,&nbsp;Philippe Huber,&nbsp;Ernst Jünger,&nbsp;Matteo Monti,&nbsp;Kai Schnabel,&nbsp;Christine Beyeler,&nbsp;Sissel Guttormsen,&nbsp;Sören Huwendiek","doi":"10.3205/zma000982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since 2011, the new national final examination in human medicine has been implemented in Switzerland, with a structured clinical-practical part in the OSCE format. From the perspective of the national Working Group, the current article describes the essential steps in the development, implementation and evaluation of the Federal Licensing Examination Clinical Skills (FLE CS) as well as the applied quality assurance measures. Finally, central insights gained from the last years are presented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the principles of action research, the FLE CS is in a constant state of further development. On the foundation of systematically documented experiences from previous years, in the Working Group, unresolved questions are discussed and resulting solution approaches are substantiated (planning), implemented in the examination (implementation) and subsequently evaluated (reflection). The presented results are the product of this iterative procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The FLE CS is created by experts from all faculties and subject areas in a multistage process. The examination is administered in German and French on a decentralised basis and consists of twelve interdisciplinary stations per candidate. As important quality assurance measures, the national Review Board (content validation) and the meetings of the standardised patient trainers (standardisation) have proven worthwhile. The statistical analyses show good measurement reliability and support the construct validity of the examination. Among the central insights of the past years, it has been established that the consistent implementation of the principles of action research contributes to the successful further development of the examination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The centrally coordinated, collaborative-iterative process, incorporating experts from all faculties, makes a fundamental contribution to the quality of the FLE CS. The processes and insights presented here can be useful for others planning a similar undertaking.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"32 4","pages":"Doc40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4606485/pdf/","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Objective: Since 2011, the new national final examination in human medicine has been implemented in Switzerland, with a structured clinical-practical part in the OSCE format. From the perspective of the national Working Group, the current article describes the essential steps in the development, implementation and evaluation of the Federal Licensing Examination Clinical Skills (FLE CS) as well as the applied quality assurance measures. Finally, central insights gained from the last years are presented.

Methods: Based on the principles of action research, the FLE CS is in a constant state of further development. On the foundation of systematically documented experiences from previous years, in the Working Group, unresolved questions are discussed and resulting solution approaches are substantiated (planning), implemented in the examination (implementation) and subsequently evaluated (reflection). The presented results are the product of this iterative procedure.

Results: The FLE CS is created by experts from all faculties and subject areas in a multistage process. The examination is administered in German and French on a decentralised basis and consists of twelve interdisciplinary stations per candidate. As important quality assurance measures, the national Review Board (content validation) and the meetings of the standardised patient trainers (standardisation) have proven worthwhile. The statistical analyses show good measurement reliability and support the construct validity of the examination. Among the central insights of the past years, it has been established that the consistent implementation of the principles of action research contributes to the successful further development of the examination.

Conclusion: The centrally coordinated, collaborative-iterative process, incorporating experts from all faculties, makes a fundamental contribution to the quality of the FLE CS. The processes and insights presented here can be useful for others planning a similar undertaking.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞士人类医学新的最终临床技能考试:考试发展、实施和评估的基本步骤,以及从国家工作组的角度来看的核心见解。
目的:自2011年起,瑞士开始实施新的国家人体医学期末考试,并采用欧安组织格式的结构化临床实践部分。从国家工作组的角度来看,本文描述了联邦许可考试临床技能(FLE CS)的发展、实施和评估的基本步骤,以及应用的质量保证措施。最后,介绍了过去几年获得的核心见解。方法:在行动研究的基础上,持续不断地进行进一步的研究。在前几年系统记录的经验的基础上,工作组讨论未解决的问题,并证实最终的解决办法(规划),在审查中实施(实施),随后评价(反思)。给出的结果是这个迭代过程的产物。结果:FLE CS是由来自所有院系和学科领域的专家在多阶段过程中创建的。考试在分散的基础上以德语和法语进行,每位考生由12个跨学科考点组成。作为重要的质量保证措施,国家审查委员会(内容验证)和标准化患者培训师会议(标准化)已被证明是值得的。统计分析显示了较好的测量信度,支持了检验的结构效度。在过去几年的核心见解中,已经确定的是,行动研究原则的一致实施有助于考试的成功进一步发展。结论:集中协调,协作迭代的过程,包括来自所有院系的专家,对FLE CS的质量做出了根本性的贡献。这里介绍的过程和见解对计划类似任务的其他人可能很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
8th meeting of the medical assessment consortium UCAN: "Collaborative Perspectives for Competency-based and Quality-assured Medical Assessment". Influence of a revision course and the gender of examiners on the grades of the final ENT exam--a retrospective review of 3961 exams. The Final Oral/Practical State Examination at Freiburg Medical Faculty in 2012--Analysis of grading to test quality assurance. The new final Clinical Skills examination in human medicine in Switzerland: Essential steps of exam development, implementation and evaluation, and central insights from the perspective of the national Working Group. Electronic acquisition of OSCE performance using tablets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1