Impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on Self-Determination: A Randomized-Trial Control Group Study.

IF 2.2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Exceptional Children Pub Date : 2012-01-01 DOI:10.1177/001440291207800201
Michael L Wehmeyer, Karrie A Shogren, Susan B Palmer, Kendra L Williams-Diehm, Todd Little, Aaron Boulton
{"title":"Impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on Self-Determination: A Randomized-Trial Control Group Study.","authors":"Michael L Wehmeyer,&nbsp;Karrie A Shogren,&nbsp;Susan B Palmer,&nbsp;Kendra L Williams-Diehm,&nbsp;Todd Little,&nbsp;Aaron Boulton","doi":"10.1177/001440291207800201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Promoting self-determination has become best practice in special education. There remains, however, a paucity of causal evidence for interventions to promote self-determination. We conducted a group-randomized, modified equivalent control group design study of the efficacy of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction to promote self-determination. Data on self-determination using multiple measures was collected with 312 high school students with cognitive disabilities in both a control and treatment group. We examined the relationship between the SDLMI and self-determination using structural equation modeling. After determining strong measurement invariance for each latent construct, we found significant differences in latent means across measurement occasions and differential effects attributable to the SDLMI. This was true across disability category, though there was variance across disability populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48164,"journal":{"name":"Exceptional Children","volume":"78 2","pages":"135-153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/001440291207800201","citationCount":"204","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptional Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800201","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 204

Abstract

Promoting self-determination has become best practice in special education. There remains, however, a paucity of causal evidence for interventions to promote self-determination. We conducted a group-randomized, modified equivalent control group design study of the efficacy of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction to promote self-determination. Data on self-determination using multiple measures was collected with 312 high school students with cognitive disabilities in both a control and treatment group. We examined the relationship between the SDLMI and self-determination using structural equation modeling. After determining strong measurement invariance for each latent construct, we found significant differences in latent means across measurement occasions and differential effects attributable to the SDLMI. This was true across disability category, though there was variance across disability populations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自主学习教学模式对自我决定的影响:一项随机试验对照组研究。
促进自决已成为特殊教育的最佳做法。然而,仍然缺乏促进自决的干预措施的因果证据。我们进行了一项组随机、修正等效对照组设计的研究,研究自主学习教学模式对促进自主的效果。采用多种测量方法收集了312名认知障碍高中生的自我决定数据,包括对照组和实验组。我们使用结构方程模型检验了SDLMI和自我决定之间的关系。在确定每个潜在构式的强测量不变性后,我们发现不同测量场合的潜在均值和SDLMI的差异效应存在显著差异。这在残疾类别中是正确的,尽管在残疾人群中存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Exceptional Children, an official journal of The Council for Exceptional Children, publishes original research and analyses that focus on the education and development of exceptional infants, toddlers, children, youth, and adults. This includes descriptions of research, research reviews, methodological reviews of the literature, data-based position papers, policy analyses, and registered reports. Exceptional Children publishes quantitative, qualitative, and single-subject design studies.
期刊最新文献
Who Are We Measuring? Teacher Effects in Gifted and Talented Teacher Rating Scales Situating Ourselves in Coalitions With and for Exceptional Children: Editors’ Introduction Differences in Loneliness Experiences Among High-Ability Students: Individual and Social Context Predictors Single-Case Effect Size Distributions for Interventions Designed to Improve Engagement in Elementary Schools Teacher Attitudes Toward Gifted Students and Gifted Education: The Typologies of Attitudes and Their Predictors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1