Psychiatric issues in palliative care: assessing mental capacity.

Palliative Care Pub Date : 2013-10-30 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.4137/PCRT.S10889
Itoro Udo, Zeid Mohammed, Amanda Gash
{"title":"Psychiatric issues in palliative care: assessing mental capacity.","authors":"Itoro Udo,&nbsp;Zeid Mohammed,&nbsp;Amanda Gash","doi":"10.4137/PCRT.S10889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Issues surrounding capacity to consent to or refuse treatment are increasingly receiving clinical and legal attention. Through the use of 3 case vignettes that involve different aspects of mental health care in palliative care settings, mental capacity issues are discussed. The vignettes tackle capacity in a patient with newly developed mental illness consequent to physical illness, capacity in a patient with mental illness but without delirium and capacity in a patient with known impairment of the mind. These discussions give credence to best practice position where physicians act in the best interests of their patients at all times. It is important to emphasize that capacity decisions have to be made on a case by case basis, within the remit of legal protection. This is a fundamental requirement of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, England & Wales (MCA). The later is used as the legal basis for these discussions. The psychiatric liaison service is a useful resource to provide consultation, advice and or joint assessment to clinicians encountering complex dilemmas involving decision-making capacity. </p>","PeriodicalId":56348,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4137/PCRT.S10889","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4137/PCRT.S10889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Issues surrounding capacity to consent to or refuse treatment are increasingly receiving clinical and legal attention. Through the use of 3 case vignettes that involve different aspects of mental health care in palliative care settings, mental capacity issues are discussed. The vignettes tackle capacity in a patient with newly developed mental illness consequent to physical illness, capacity in a patient with mental illness but without delirium and capacity in a patient with known impairment of the mind. These discussions give credence to best practice position where physicians act in the best interests of their patients at all times. It is important to emphasize that capacity decisions have to be made on a case by case basis, within the remit of legal protection. This is a fundamental requirement of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, England & Wales (MCA). The later is used as the legal basis for these discussions. The psychiatric liaison service is a useful resource to provide consultation, advice and or joint assessment to clinicians encountering complex dilemmas involving decision-making capacity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
姑息治疗中的精神问题:评估精神能力。
有关同意或拒绝治疗能力的问题日益受到临床和法律的关注。通过使用涉及姑息治疗环境中心理健康护理的不同方面的3个案例,讨论了心理能力问题。这些小插曲处理了由身体疾病导致的新发展的精神疾病患者的能力,患有精神疾病但没有谵妄的患者的能力以及已知的精神损伤患者的能力。这些讨论为最佳实践立场提供了依据,即医生在任何时候都以患者的最佳利益行事。必须强调的是,能力决定必须在法律保护的范围内逐案作出。这是《2005年英格兰和威尔士精神能力法》(MCA)的一项基本要求。后者被用作这些讨论的法律依据。精神科联络服务是一个有用的资源,为遇到涉及决策能力的复杂困境的临床医生提供咨询、建议和/或联合评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Care and Social Practice is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes articles on all aspects of palliative care. It welcomes articles from symptom science, clinical practice, and health services research. However, its aim is also to publish cutting-edge research from the realm of social practice - from public health theory and practice, social medicine, and social work, to social sciences related to dying and its care, as well as policy, criticism, and cultural studies. We encourage reports from work with under-represented groups, community development, and studies of civic engagement in end of life issues. Furthermore, we encourage scholarly articles that challenge current thinking about dying, its current care models and practices, and current understandings of grief and bereavement. We want to showcase the next generation of palliative care innovation research and practice - in clinics and in the wider society. Relaunched in July 2019. Partnered with Public Health Palliative Care International (PHPCI) (Title 2008-2018: - Palliative Care: Research and Treatment)
期刊最新文献
2022-RA-747-ESGO Quality of end-of-life care and patterns of palliative care use by women with gynaecologic malignancies in Ontario, Canada: a 13-year population-based retrospective analysis 2022-RA-1238-ESGO Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in oligometastatic gynaecological malignancies 2022-RA-1043-ESGO CT-guided percutenous radiologic gastrostomy in heavily pretreated patients with late stage ovarian cancer: -the charité experiences- 2022-RA-854-ESGO Giving prognostic information by using scenarios – attitudes of women with gynecological cancer 1022 Documenting the journey from DNACPR to surgical R zero – radical extent in a young patient with metastatic undifferentiated leiomyosarcoma relapse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1