Validity of alcohol screening instruments in general population gender studies: an analytical review.

Janaina Barbosa de Oliveira, Florence Kerr-Corrêa, Maria Cristina Pereira Lima, José Manoel Bertolote, Jair Lício Ferreira Santos
{"title":"Validity of alcohol screening instruments in general population gender studies: an analytical review.","authors":"Janaina Barbosa de Oliveira,&nbsp;Florence Kerr-Corrêa,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Pereira Lima,&nbsp;José Manoel Bertolote,&nbsp;Jair Lício Ferreira Santos","doi":"10.2174/1874473707666141015214708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study is an analytical review of the methodology used in studies of efficacy of screening instruments to detect harmful use/ alcohol dependence according to the gender in population surveys. Systematic review of bibliography was done, using data from Web of Science, Pubmed and PsycInfo. Population studies were included without date range, in English, Spanish or Portuguese languages, with sample of adults, evaluating psychometric characteristics of any alcohol screening instrument, whereas studies in special population or under treatment as well as prevalence of alcohol consumption were excluded. Thirteen studies were selected to be included in the present review. According to the studies, the instruments that presented a better performance among men were AUDIT and its derivatives (6 studies) and CAGE (2 studies), whereas among women, AUDIT and its derivatives (7 studies), followed by CAGE (3 studies). The increase of consumption and problems related to alcohol use and its implications for public health indicate the need and urgency for adequacy of screening instruments to differences of gender in general population. The population surveys in the area are scarce. Furthermore, the found studies present heterogeneous methodology which makes accurate comparisons difficult. </p>","PeriodicalId":72730,"journal":{"name":"Current drug abuse reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874473707666141015214708","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug abuse reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874473707666141015214708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The present study is an analytical review of the methodology used in studies of efficacy of screening instruments to detect harmful use/ alcohol dependence according to the gender in population surveys. Systematic review of bibliography was done, using data from Web of Science, Pubmed and PsycInfo. Population studies were included without date range, in English, Spanish or Portuguese languages, with sample of adults, evaluating psychometric characteristics of any alcohol screening instrument, whereas studies in special population or under treatment as well as prevalence of alcohol consumption were excluded. Thirteen studies were selected to be included in the present review. According to the studies, the instruments that presented a better performance among men were AUDIT and its derivatives (6 studies) and CAGE (2 studies), whereas among women, AUDIT and its derivatives (7 studies), followed by CAGE (3 studies). The increase of consumption and problems related to alcohol use and its implications for public health indicate the need and urgency for adequacy of screening instruments to differences of gender in general population. The population surveys in the area are scarce. Furthermore, the found studies present heterogeneous methodology which makes accurate comparisons difficult.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酒精筛查工具在普通人群性别研究中的有效性:一项分析综述
本研究是对在人口调查中根据性别检测有害使用/酒精依赖的筛查工具的有效性研究中使用的方法进行分析审查。使用Web of Science、Pubmed和PsycInfo的数据进行了系统的参考文献综述。纳入无日期范围的人口研究,以英语、西班牙语或葡萄牙语为样本,以成人为样本,评估任何酒精筛查工具的心理测量特征,而在特殊人群或正在接受治疗的人群中进行的研究以及酒精消费的流行程度被排除在外。本综述选取了13项研究纳入。根据这些研究,在男性中表现较好的工具是AUDIT及其衍生物(6项研究)和CAGE(2项研究),而在女性中,AUDIT及其衍生物(7项研究),其次是CAGE(3项研究)。消费的增加和与酒精使用有关的问题及其对公共健康的影响表明,需要和迫切需要对一般人口的性别差异采取适当的筛查手段。这个地区的人口调查很少。此外,所发现的研究呈现异质的方法,这使得准确的比较变得困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface. Meet Our Editor-in-Chief Proceeding of the 8th Alcohol Hangover Research Group Meeting. Development of a Definition for the Alcohol Hangover: Consumer Descriptions and Expert Consensus. A Review of the Physiological Factors Associated with Alcohol Hangover.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1