Rural pharmacy closures: implications for rural communities.

Q2 Medicine Rural policy brief Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Kelli Todd, Fred Ullrich, Keith Mueller
{"title":"Rural pharmacy closures: implications for rural communities.","authors":"Kelli Todd,&nbsp;Fred Ullrich,&nbsp;Keith Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Retail pharmacies provide essential services to residents of rural areas and serve many communities as the sole provider of pharmacist services. Losing the only retail pharmacy within a rural community (census designated city), and within a 10 mile radius based on driving distance (\"sole community pharmacy\"), may affect access to prescription and over-the-counter drugs and, in some cases, leave the community without proximate access to any clinical provider. This policy brief documents the closure of local retail pharmacies in which the pharmacist was the only clinical provider available in the community at the time the pharmacy closed. Characteristics of the community and the retail pharmacy are described. The findings may suggest future policy actions to minimize the risk or mitigate the negative consequences of pharmacy closures. Key Findings. (1) Between May 1, 2006, and October 31, 2010, 119 sole community pharmacies closed. (2) Of those 119 pharmacies, 31 were located in rural communities with no other health professionals or clinical providers. (3) In 16 states, at least 1 community lost a sole community retail pharmacy, and there was no other pharmacy within 10 miles (actual driving distance). (4) Of the 31 pharmacy closures in communities with no other providers, 17% were located in remote rural areas designated with a Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) score of 10 or higher. Such a score means that, on average, 60 minutes of travel time is required to reach an urbanized area, and 40 minutes is required to reach a large urban cluster of 20,000 population or more.</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":" 2012 5","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural policy brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retail pharmacies provide essential services to residents of rural areas and serve many communities as the sole provider of pharmacist services. Losing the only retail pharmacy within a rural community (census designated city), and within a 10 mile radius based on driving distance ("sole community pharmacy"), may affect access to prescription and over-the-counter drugs and, in some cases, leave the community without proximate access to any clinical provider. This policy brief documents the closure of local retail pharmacies in which the pharmacist was the only clinical provider available in the community at the time the pharmacy closed. Characteristics of the community and the retail pharmacy are described. The findings may suggest future policy actions to minimize the risk or mitigate the negative consequences of pharmacy closures. Key Findings. (1) Between May 1, 2006, and October 31, 2010, 119 sole community pharmacies closed. (2) Of those 119 pharmacies, 31 were located in rural communities with no other health professionals or clinical providers. (3) In 16 states, at least 1 community lost a sole community retail pharmacy, and there was no other pharmacy within 10 miles (actual driving distance). (4) Of the 31 pharmacy closures in communities with no other providers, 17% were located in remote rural areas designated with a Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) score of 10 or higher. Such a score means that, on average, 60 minutes of travel time is required to reach an urbanized area, and 40 minutes is required to reach a large urban cluster of 20,000 population or more.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村药房关闭:对农村社区的影响。
零售药店为农村居民提供基本服务,并作为药剂师服务的唯一提供者为许多社区提供服务。失去农村社区(人口普查指定的城市)内唯一的零售药店,并且基于开车距离在10英里半径内(“唯一的社区药房”),可能会影响处方药和非处方药的获取,并且在某些情况下,使社区无法就近获得任何临床提供者。本政策概要记录了当地零售药店的关闭情况,其中药剂师是药店关闭时社区中唯一可用的临床提供者。描述了社区药房和零售药房的特点。研究结果可能建议未来采取政策行动,以尽量减少风险或减轻药房关闭的负面后果。关键的发现。(1) 2006年5月1日至2010年10月31日期间,有119家社区药店关闭。(2)在这119家药房中,31家位于农村社区,没有其他卫生专业人员或临床服务提供者。(3)在16个州中,至少有1个社区失去了唯一的社区零售药店,并且在10英里(实际驾驶距离)内没有其他药店。(4)在31家没有其他提供者的社区关闭的药店中,17%位于城乡通勤区(RUCA)得分为10分或更高的偏远农村地区。这样的分数意味着,到达一个城市化地区平均需要60分钟的旅行时间,到达2万人口以上的大型城市群平均需要40分钟的旅行时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rural policy brief
Rural policy brief Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing Rural and Urban Medicare Advantage Beneficiary Characteristics. Changes to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System Pertinent to Small and Rural Practices, 2018. Trends in Hospital System Affiliation, 2007-2016. Health Insurance Marketplaces: Issuer Participation and Premium Trends in Rural Places, 2018. Spread of Medicare Accountable Care Organizations in Rural America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1