Comparing Rural and Urban Medicare Advantage Beneficiary Characteristics.

Q2 Medicine Rural policy brief Pub Date : 2019-03-01
Abigail Barker, Lindsey Nienstedt, Leah Kemper, Timothy McBride, Keith Mueller
{"title":"Comparing Rural and Urban Medicare Advantage Beneficiary Characteristics.","authors":"Abigail Barker,&nbsp;Lindsey Nienstedt,&nbsp;Leah Kemper,&nbsp;Timothy McBride,&nbsp;Keith Mueller","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Medicare Advantage (MA) program allows Medicare beneficiaries to receive benefits from private plans rather than from traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare. Little is known about the rural and urban differences in the populations that enroll in the MA program, and these differences may be important for setting policy. This brief uses data from the 2012-13 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) to describe these differences, and combined with county-level data on MA issuer participation, this dataset also allows us to assess the degree to which issuers may engage in selective MA market entry on the basis of demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>(1) Rural and urban MA and FFS populations did not differ much on average by any characteristics reported in the data, including age, self-reported health status, cancer diagnosis, smoking status, Medicaid status, or by other variables assessing frailty and presence of chronic conditions. (2) Most measures of access were similar across rural and urban respondents. However, in terms of cost, urban enrollees were less likely to pay an additional premium (beyond Medicare Part A and B) to obtain MA coverage: 42 percent reported doing so in urban places, while 54 percent did so in rural places. (3) While rurality on its own was often a significant predictor of lower issuer participation in a county’s MA market, the addition of other demographic characteristics did not influence the prediction. In other words, we found no evidence, based upon MCBS data, that issuers exclude rural counties due to other demographics.</p>","PeriodicalId":38994,"journal":{"name":"Rural policy brief","volume":"2019 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rural policy brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Medicare Advantage (MA) program allows Medicare beneficiaries to receive benefits from private plans rather than from traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare. Little is known about the rural and urban differences in the populations that enroll in the MA program, and these differences may be important for setting policy. This brief uses data from the 2012-13 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) to describe these differences, and combined with county-level data on MA issuer participation, this dataset also allows us to assess the degree to which issuers may engage in selective MA market entry on the basis of demographic characteristics.

Key findings: (1) Rural and urban MA and FFS populations did not differ much on average by any characteristics reported in the data, including age, self-reported health status, cancer diagnosis, smoking status, Medicaid status, or by other variables assessing frailty and presence of chronic conditions. (2) Most measures of access were similar across rural and urban respondents. However, in terms of cost, urban enrollees were less likely to pay an additional premium (beyond Medicare Part A and B) to obtain MA coverage: 42 percent reported doing so in urban places, while 54 percent did so in rural places. (3) While rurality on its own was often a significant predictor of lower issuer participation in a county’s MA market, the addition of other demographic characteristics did not influence the prediction. In other words, we found no evidence, based upon MCBS data, that issuers exclude rural counties due to other demographics.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较城乡医保优势受益人特征。
目的:医疗保险优势(MA)计划允许医疗保险受益人从私人计划而不是传统的按服务收费(FFS)医疗保险中获得福利。人们对参加硕士课程的人口中农村和城市的差异知之甚少,这些差异可能对制定政策很重要。本简报使用2012-13年医疗保险现行受益人调查(MCBS)的数据来描述这些差异,并结合县级MA发行人参与的数据,该数据集还允许我们评估发行人可能根据人口统计学特征参与选择性MA市场进入的程度。主要发现:(1)农村和城市MA和FFS人口在数据中报告的任何特征(包括年龄、自我报告的健康状况、癌症诊断、吸烟状况、医疗补助状况或评估虚弱和慢性病存在的其他变量)方面的平均差异不大。(2)农村和城市受访者的大多数获取措施相似。然而,就成本而言,城市的参保人不太可能支付额外的保费(超过医疗保险A部分和B部分)来获得MA覆盖:42%的人报告在城市地区这样做,而54%的人在农村地区这样做。(3)虽然乡村性本身往往是一个显著的预测因素,较低的发行人参与一个县的MA市场,其他人口特征的加入并不影响预测。换句话说,根据MCBS的数据,我们没有发现任何证据表明发行人由于其他人口统计数据而排除了农村县。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rural policy brief
Rural policy brief Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing Rural and Urban Medicare Advantage Beneficiary Characteristics. Changes to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System Pertinent to Small and Rural Practices, 2018. Trends in Hospital System Affiliation, 2007-2016. Health Insurance Marketplaces: Issuer Participation and Premium Trends in Rural Places, 2018. Spread of Medicare Accountable Care Organizations in Rural America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1