Comparison of Caffeine and d-amphetamine in Cocaine-Dependent Subjects: Differential Outcomes on Subjective and Cardiovascular Effects, Reward Learning, and Salivary Paraxanthine.

Scott D Lane, Charles E Green, Joy M Schmitz, Nuvan Rathnayaka, Wendy B Fang, Sergi Ferré, F Gerard Moeller
{"title":"Comparison of Caffeine and d-amphetamine in Cocaine-Dependent Subjects: Differential Outcomes on Subjective and Cardiovascular Effects, Reward Learning, and Salivary Paraxanthine.","authors":"Scott D Lane,&nbsp;Charles E Green,&nbsp;Joy M Schmitz,&nbsp;Nuvan Rathnayaka,&nbsp;Wendy B Fang,&nbsp;Sergi Ferré,&nbsp;F Gerard Moeller","doi":"10.4172/2155-6105.1000176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to indirect modulation of dopamine transmission, adenosine receptor antagonists may be useful in either treating cocaine use or improving disrupted cognitive-behavioral functions associated with chronic cocaine use. To compare and contrast the stimulant effects of adenosine antagonism to direct dopamine stimulation, we administered 150 mg and 300 mg caffeine, 20 mg amphetamine, and placebo to cocaine-dependent vs. healthy control subjects, matched on moderate caffeine use. Data were obtained on measures of cardiovascular effects, subjective drug effects (ARCI, VAS, DEQ), and a probabilistic reward-learning task sensitive to dopamine modulation. Levels of salivary caffeine and the primary caffeine metabolite paraxanthine were obtained on placebo and caffeine dosing days. Cardiovascular results revealed main effects of dose for diastolic blood pressure and heart rate; follow up tests showed that controls were most sensitive to 300 mg caffeine and 20 mg amphetamine; cocaine-dependent subjects were sensitive only to 300 mg caffeine. Subjective effects results revealed dose × time and dose × group interactions on the ARCI A, ARCI LSD, and VAS 'elated' scales; follow up tests did not show systematic differences between groups with regard to caffeine or d-amphetamine. Large between-group differences in salivary paraxanthine (but not salivary caffeine) levels were obtained under both caffeine doses. The cocaine-dependent group expressed significantly higher paraxanthine levels than controls under 150 mg and 3-4 fold greater levels under 300 mg at 90 min and 150 min post caffeine dose. However, these differences also covaried with cigarette smoking status (not balanced between groups), and nicotine smoking is known to alter caffeine/paraxanthine metabolism via cytochrome P450 enzymes. These preliminary data raise the possibility that adenosine antagonists may affect cocaine-dependent and non-dependent subjects differently. In conjunction with previous preclinical and human studies, the data suggest that adenosine modulating drugs may have value in the treatment of stimulant use disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":73583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of addiction research & therapy","volume":"5 2","pages":"176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-6105.1000176","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of addiction research & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6105.1000176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Due to indirect modulation of dopamine transmission, adenosine receptor antagonists may be useful in either treating cocaine use or improving disrupted cognitive-behavioral functions associated with chronic cocaine use. To compare and contrast the stimulant effects of adenosine antagonism to direct dopamine stimulation, we administered 150 mg and 300 mg caffeine, 20 mg amphetamine, and placebo to cocaine-dependent vs. healthy control subjects, matched on moderate caffeine use. Data were obtained on measures of cardiovascular effects, subjective drug effects (ARCI, VAS, DEQ), and a probabilistic reward-learning task sensitive to dopamine modulation. Levels of salivary caffeine and the primary caffeine metabolite paraxanthine were obtained on placebo and caffeine dosing days. Cardiovascular results revealed main effects of dose for diastolic blood pressure and heart rate; follow up tests showed that controls were most sensitive to 300 mg caffeine and 20 mg amphetamine; cocaine-dependent subjects were sensitive only to 300 mg caffeine. Subjective effects results revealed dose × time and dose × group interactions on the ARCI A, ARCI LSD, and VAS 'elated' scales; follow up tests did not show systematic differences between groups with regard to caffeine or d-amphetamine. Large between-group differences in salivary paraxanthine (but not salivary caffeine) levels were obtained under both caffeine doses. The cocaine-dependent group expressed significantly higher paraxanthine levels than controls under 150 mg and 3-4 fold greater levels under 300 mg at 90 min and 150 min post caffeine dose. However, these differences also covaried with cigarette smoking status (not balanced between groups), and nicotine smoking is known to alter caffeine/paraxanthine metabolism via cytochrome P450 enzymes. These preliminary data raise the possibility that adenosine antagonists may affect cocaine-dependent and non-dependent subjects differently. In conjunction with previous preclinical and human studies, the data suggest that adenosine modulating drugs may have value in the treatment of stimulant use disorders.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咖啡因和d-安非他明在可卡因依赖受试者中的比较:主观和心血管效应、奖励学习和唾液副黄嘌呤的不同结果。
由于多巴胺传递的间接调节,腺苷受体拮抗剂可能对治疗可卡因使用或改善与慢性可卡因使用相关的认知行为功能紊乱有用。为了比较和对比腺苷拮抗剂与直接多巴胺刺激的兴奋作用,我们给可卡因依赖者和健康对照者分别施用150毫克和300毫克咖啡因、20毫克安非他明和安慰剂,并与适度咖啡因使用相匹配。获得了心血管效应、主观药物效应(ARCI、VAS、DEQ)和对多巴胺调节敏感的概率奖励学习任务的测量数据。唾液中咖啡因和主要咖啡因代谢物副黄嘌呤的水平在服用安慰剂和咖啡因的日子里得到。心血管结果显示剂量主要影响舒张压和心率;后续试验表明,对照组对300毫克咖啡因和20毫克安非他明最为敏感;可卡因依赖者只对300毫克的咖啡因敏感。主观效应结果显示剂量×时间和剂量×组在ARCI A、ARCI LSD和VAS“相关”量表上的相互作用;后续测试没有显示出咖啡因和d-安非他明在两组之间的系统性差异。在两种咖啡因剂量下,唾液副黄嘌呤(而不是唾液咖啡因)水平在组间有很大差异。可卡因依赖组的副黄嘌呤水平在150毫克剂量下明显高于对照组,在咖啡因剂量后90分钟和150分钟,300毫克剂量下的副黄嘌呤水平是对照组的3-4倍。然而,这些差异也与吸烟状况相关(组间不平衡),并且已知尼古丁吸烟会通过细胞色素P450酶改变咖啡因/副黄嘌呤代谢。这些初步数据提出了腺苷拮抗剂可能对可卡因依赖和非依赖受试者产生不同影响的可能性。结合先前的临床前和人体研究,数据表明腺苷调节药物可能在治疗兴奋剂使用障碍方面具有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prevention and Intervention with Young People as a Critical Public Health Strategy to Curtail the Opioid Epidemic: A Call to Action. Analysis of Opioid Poisoning in Medically Underserved Rural Areas: An Evaluation of International Statistical Classification of Diseases Codes from the State of South Dakota. Preliminary Findings of Weaker Executive Control Network Resting State fMRI Functional Connectivity in Opioid Use Disorder compared to Healthy Controls. Targeting the α4β2- and α7-Subtypes of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors for Smoking Cessation Medication Development. Alcoholic Drinks Consumption among College Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1