Accessibility in Text and Discourse Processing.

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Discourse Processes Pub Date : 2004-04-01 DOI:10.1207/s15326950dp3702_1
Ted J M Sanders, Morton Ann Gernsbacher
{"title":"Accessibility in Text and Discourse Processing.","authors":"Ted J M Sanders,&nbsp;Morton Ann Gernsbacher","doi":"10.1207/s15326950dp3702_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accessibility is one of the most important challenges at the intersection of linguistic and psycholinguistic studies of text and discourse processing. Linguists have shown how linguistic indicators of referential coherence show a systematic pattern: Longer linguistic forms (like full lexical NPs) tend to be used when referents are relatively low accessible, shorter forms (pronouns and zero anaphora) are used when referents are highly accessible. This linguistic theory fits in nicely with a dynamic view of text and discourse processing: When a reader proceeds through a text, the activation of concepts as part of the reader's representation fluctuates constantly. Hypotheses considering activation patterns can be tested with on-line research methods like reading time or eye-movement recording. The articles in this special issue show how accessibility phenomena need to be studied from a linguistic and a psycholinguistic angle, and in the latter case from interpretation as well as production.</p>","PeriodicalId":11316,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Processes","volume":"37 2","pages":"79-89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1207/s15326950dp3702_1","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Processes","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3702_1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Accessibility is one of the most important challenges at the intersection of linguistic and psycholinguistic studies of text and discourse processing. Linguists have shown how linguistic indicators of referential coherence show a systematic pattern: Longer linguistic forms (like full lexical NPs) tend to be used when referents are relatively low accessible, shorter forms (pronouns and zero anaphora) are used when referents are highly accessible. This linguistic theory fits in nicely with a dynamic view of text and discourse processing: When a reader proceeds through a text, the activation of concepts as part of the reader's representation fluctuates constantly. Hypotheses considering activation patterns can be tested with on-line research methods like reading time or eye-movement recording. The articles in this special issue show how accessibility phenomena need to be studied from a linguistic and a psycholinguistic angle, and in the latter case from interpretation as well as production.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文本和语篇处理中的可及性。
可及性是文本和话语处理的语言学和心理语言学交叉研究中最重要的挑战之一。语言学家已经证明了指称连贯性的语言指标是如何显示出一种系统模式的:当指称物相对较难获得时,往往使用较长的语言形式(如完整的词汇NPs),当指称物高度可获得时,则使用较短的语言形式(代词和零回指)。这一语言学理论与文本和话语处理的动态观点非常吻合:当读者继续阅读文本时,作为读者表征的一部分,概念的激活会不断波动。考虑激活模式的假设可以通过在线研究方法进行测试,比如阅读时间或眼球运动记录。本期特刊的文章展示了如何从语言学和心理语言学的角度来研究可达性现象,在后一种情况下,从解释和生产的角度来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Discourse Processes is a multidisciplinary journal providing a forum for cross-fertilization of ideas from diverse disciplines sharing a common interest in discourse--prose comprehension and recall, dialogue analysis, text grammar construction, computer simulation of natural language, cross-cultural comparisons of communicative competence, or related topics. The problems posed by multisentence contexts and the methods required to investigate them, although not always unique to discourse, are sufficiently distinct so as to require an organized mode of scientific interaction made possible through the journal.
期刊最新文献
The costs of multimodal metaphors: comparing ERPs to figurative expressions in verbal and verbo-pictorial formats Vocabulary size and exposure to print predict mastery of connectives in teenage years Comprehending irony in text: evidence from scanpaths Eye-tracking evidence from attachment structures favors a serial model of discourse–sentence interactivity Pinning down the interaction between animacy and syntactic function in the interpretation of German and Italian personal and demonstrative pronouns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1