Incentives for market penetration of biosimilars in Belgium and in five European countries.

Journal de pharmacie de Belgique Pub Date : 2014-12-01
N Swartenbroekx, Farfan-Portet, J Espín, S Gerkens
{"title":"Incentives for market penetration of biosimilars in Belgium and in five European countries.","authors":"N Swartenbroekx,&nbsp;Farfan-Portet,&nbsp;J Espín,&nbsp;S Gerkens","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biosimilars are products similar to a biological already authorized and no longer protected by a patent. As the biological product, they contain a biological substance produced by or derived from a living organism. Alike with generics, biosimilars are potential tool to ensure savings for health systems. The current lack of market penetration of biosimilars may be seen by national authorities as a lost opportunity in terms of cost- containment. The objective of this paper is therefore to analyze the current situation in Belgium and to identify potential measures to stimulate biosimilar uptake in Belgium through an analysis of the experience in five European countries: France, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain and Sweden. This international comparison was performed using a two steps analysis: a structured review of the literature followed by a validation from experts in each country. Potential incentives and constraints were identified, i.e., prescription quotas/target, clinical guidelines, primary substitution, reference price system, fixed payment and public tendering. However, the literature reviewed provided little evaluation of the effectiveness of these policies in terms of biosimilar uptake or potential savings. The impact of these policies on biosimilar related savings is currently based on expectation and assumptions. Such kind of studies is therefore essential in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":14736,"journal":{"name":"Journal de pharmacie de Belgique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal de pharmacie de Belgique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biosimilars are products similar to a biological already authorized and no longer protected by a patent. As the biological product, they contain a biological substance produced by or derived from a living organism. Alike with generics, biosimilars are potential tool to ensure savings for health systems. The current lack of market penetration of biosimilars may be seen by national authorities as a lost opportunity in terms of cost- containment. The objective of this paper is therefore to analyze the current situation in Belgium and to identify potential measures to stimulate biosimilar uptake in Belgium through an analysis of the experience in five European countries: France, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain and Sweden. This international comparison was performed using a two steps analysis: a structured review of the literature followed by a validation from experts in each country. Potential incentives and constraints were identified, i.e., prescription quotas/target, clinical guidelines, primary substitution, reference price system, fixed payment and public tendering. However, the literature reviewed provided little evaluation of the effectiveness of these policies in terms of biosimilar uptake or potential savings. The impact of these policies on biosimilar related savings is currently based on expectation and assumptions. Such kind of studies is therefore essential in the future.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼓励生物仿制药在比利时和五个欧洲国家的市场渗透。
生物仿制药是指与已获授权且不再受专利保护的生物药品类似的产品。作为生物产品,它们含有由活生物体产生或衍生的生物物质。与仿制药一样,生物仿制药是确保卫生系统节省开支的潜在工具。目前缺乏生物仿制药的市场渗透可能被国家当局视为在成本控制方面失去了机会。因此,本文的目的是分析比利时的现状,并通过分析五个欧洲国家(法国、德国、荷兰、西班牙和瑞典)的经验,确定刺激比利时生物仿制药吸收的潜在措施。这项国际比较是通过两步分析进行的:对文献进行结构化审查,然后由每个国家的专家进行验证。确定了潜在的激励和制约因素,即处方配额/指标、临床指南、初级替代、参考价格制度、固定付款和公开招标。然而,文献综述提供了很少的评估这些政策的有效性方面的生物仿制药的吸收或潜在的节省。这些政策对生物类似药相关节约的影响目前是基于预期和假设。因此,这种研究在未来是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Hepatitis C]. [Essential oils: good advice by the pharmacist is necessary]. [Practical guidelines to ensure the quality of compounded preparations in community pharmacies]. [The social sciences at the Faculty of Pharmacy: and innovative course of community health at the University of Montreal]. [Pharmaceutical care for pediatric hemato-oncology and stem cell transplantation patients. Inventory of experiences and needs].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1