Crisis intervention related to the use of psychoactive substances in recreational settings--evaluating the Kosmicare Project at Boom Festival.

Maria Carmo Carvalho, Mariana Pinto de Sousa, Paula Frango, Pedro Dias, Joana Carvalho, Marta Rodrigues, Tania Rodrigues
{"title":"Crisis intervention related to the use of psychoactive substances in recreational settings--evaluating the Kosmicare Project at Boom Festival.","authors":"Maria Carmo Carvalho,&nbsp;Mariana Pinto de Sousa,&nbsp;Paula Frango,&nbsp;Pedro Dias,&nbsp;Joana Carvalho,&nbsp;Marta Rodrigues,&nbsp;Tania Rodrigues","doi":"10.2174/1874473708666150107115515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kosmicare project implements crisis intervention in situations related to the use of psychoactive substances at Boom Festival (Portugal). We present evaluation research that aims to contribute to the transformation of the project into an evidence-based intervention model. It relies on harm reduction and risk minimization principles, crisis intervention models, and Grof's psychedelic psychotherapy approach for crisis intervention in situations related to unsupervised use of psychedelics. Intervention was expected to produce knowledge about the relation between substance use and mental health impact in reducing potential risk related to the use of psychoactive substances and mental illness, as well as an impact upon target population's views of themselves, their relationship to substance use, and to life events in general. Research includes data on process and outcome indicators through a mixed methods approach, collected next to a sample of n=176 participants. Sample size varied considerably, however, among different research measures. 52% of Kosmicare visitors reported LSD use. Over 40% also presented multiple drug use. Pre-post mental state evaluation showed statistically significant difference (p<.05) confirming crisis resolution. Crisis episodes that presented no resolution were more often related with mental health outburst episodes, with psychoactive substance use or not. Visitors showed high satisfaction with intervention (n=58) and according to follow-up (n=18) this perception was stable over time. Crisis intervention was experienced as very significant. We discuss limitations and implications of evaluating natural setting based interventions, and the relation between psychoactive substance use and psychopathology. Other data on visitor's profile and vulnerability to crisis showed inconclusive. </p>","PeriodicalId":72730,"journal":{"name":"Current drug abuse reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug abuse reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874473708666150107115515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Kosmicare project implements crisis intervention in situations related to the use of psychoactive substances at Boom Festival (Portugal). We present evaluation research that aims to contribute to the transformation of the project into an evidence-based intervention model. It relies on harm reduction and risk minimization principles, crisis intervention models, and Grof's psychedelic psychotherapy approach for crisis intervention in situations related to unsupervised use of psychedelics. Intervention was expected to produce knowledge about the relation between substance use and mental health impact in reducing potential risk related to the use of psychoactive substances and mental illness, as well as an impact upon target population's views of themselves, their relationship to substance use, and to life events in general. Research includes data on process and outcome indicators through a mixed methods approach, collected next to a sample of n=176 participants. Sample size varied considerably, however, among different research measures. 52% of Kosmicare visitors reported LSD use. Over 40% also presented multiple drug use. Pre-post mental state evaluation showed statistically significant difference (p<.05) confirming crisis resolution. Crisis episodes that presented no resolution were more often related with mental health outburst episodes, with psychoactive substance use or not. Visitors showed high satisfaction with intervention (n=58) and according to follow-up (n=18) this perception was stable over time. Crisis intervention was experienced as very significant. We discuss limitations and implications of evaluating natural setting based interventions, and the relation between psychoactive substance use and psychopathology. Other data on visitor's profile and vulnerability to crisis showed inconclusive.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与娱乐场所使用精神活性物质相关的危机干预——Boom Festival上Kosmicare项目的评估。
Kosmicare项目在Boom节(葡萄牙)与使用精神活性物质有关的情况下实施危机干预。我们提出评估研究,旨在促进项目转化为循证干预模式。它依赖于危害减少和风险最小化原则,危机干预模型,以及Grof的迷幻心理治疗方法在与无监督使用迷幻药相关的情况下进行危机干预。预期干预措施将产生关于药物使用与心理健康影响之间关系的知识,减少与使用精神活性物质和精神疾病有关的潜在风险,并影响目标人群对自己的看法、他们与药物使用的关系以及对一般生活事件的看法。研究包括通过混合方法方法收集的过程和结果指标数据,旁边有176名参与者的样本。然而,在不同的研究方法中,样本量差异很大。52%的Kosmicare访问者报告使用LSD。超过40%的人还存在多种药物使用。前后心理状态评价差异有统计学意义(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface. Meet Our Editor-in-Chief Proceeding of the 8th Alcohol Hangover Research Group Meeting. Development of a Definition for the Alcohol Hangover: Consumer Descriptions and Expert Consensus. A Review of the Physiological Factors Associated with Alcohol Hangover.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1