Incidental findings detected on emergency abdominal CT scans: a 1-year review.

M E Kelly, A Heeney, C E Redmond, J Costelloe, G J Nason, J Ryan, D Brophy, D C Winter
{"title":"Incidental findings detected on emergency abdominal CT scans: a 1-year review.","authors":"M E Kelly,&nbsp;A Heeney,&nbsp;C E Redmond,&nbsp;J Costelloe,&nbsp;G J Nason,&nbsp;J Ryan,&nbsp;D Brophy,&nbsp;D C Winter","doi":"10.1007/s00261-015-0349-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, there has been a substantial rise in the use of computed tomography (CT) in the emergency medicine setting. Accordingly, with increased CT usage there has been an upsurge in incidental pathology detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all emergency CT abdominal scans performed at a university teaching hospital was examined. The frequency of incidental findings, their clinical significance and workload effect for the radiology department was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1155 patients had an emergency abdominal CT scan of which 700 had incidental findings detected. Of the incidental findings, 143 were deemed indeterminate requiring urgent investigations. Twenty-four occult neoplasms were confirmed subsequently. Additionally, 259 patients were recommended for additional diagnostics. The cumulative effect of the initial emergency abdominal CT was 15,015 relative value units (RVU). Subsequent imaging of incidental findings resulted in another 1674 RVU workload for radiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incidental findings cause considerable debate and concern over which patients require significant follow-up, investigations, and/or surveillance. This exerts significant pressures on sub-specialties for their expert input, with increased workload and implications on healthcare service provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":7014,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Imaging","volume":"40 6","pages":"1853-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00261-015-0349-4","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0349-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, there has been a substantial rise in the use of computed tomography (CT) in the emergency medicine setting. Accordingly, with increased CT usage there has been an upsurge in incidental pathology detection.

Methods: A retrospective review of all emergency CT abdominal scans performed at a university teaching hospital was examined. The frequency of incidental findings, their clinical significance and workload effect for the radiology department was assessed.

Results: 1155 patients had an emergency abdominal CT scan of which 700 had incidental findings detected. Of the incidental findings, 143 were deemed indeterminate requiring urgent investigations. Twenty-four occult neoplasms were confirmed subsequently. Additionally, 259 patients were recommended for additional diagnostics. The cumulative effect of the initial emergency abdominal CT was 15,015 relative value units (RVU). Subsequent imaging of incidental findings resulted in another 1674 RVU workload for radiology.

Conclusion: Incidental findings cause considerable debate and concern over which patients require significant follow-up, investigations, and/or surveillance. This exerts significant pressures on sub-specialties for their expert input, with increased workload and implications on healthcare service provision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊腹部CT扫描中发现的意外发现:1年回顾
近年来,在急诊医学环境中,计算机断层扫描(CT)的使用有了实质性的增加。因此,随着CT使用的增加,附带病理检测也出现了激增。方法:回顾性分析某大学附属教学医院急诊CT腹部扫描资料。评估意外发现的频率、临床意义和对放射科的工作量影响。结果:1155例患者急诊腹部CT扫描,其中700例有意外发现。在附带调查结果中,有143项被认为是不确定的,需要紧急调查。随后确诊24例隐匿性肿瘤。此外,259名患者被推荐进行额外的诊断。初始急诊腹部CT累积效应为15015相对价值单位(RVU)。随后偶然发现的影像学检查导致放射学又增加了1674 RVU工作量。结论:偶然发现引起了相当大的争论和关注,哪些患者需要显著的随访、调查和/或监测。这对亚专科的专家投入造成了巨大压力,工作量增加,并对医疗保健服务的提供产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Imaging
Abdominal Imaging 医学-核医学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2 months
期刊最新文献
Magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer: staging and restaging evaluation. The wall-echo-shadow (WES) sign. Lowering radiation dose during dedicated colorectal cancer MDCT: comparison of low tube voltage and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction at 80 kVp versus blended dual-energy images in a population of patients with low body mass index. Female perineal diseases: spectrum of imaging findings. Effect of radiologists' experience with an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm on detection of hypervascular liver lesions and perception of image quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1