Impact of the German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (DLAR) on therapeutic options to reduce increased Lp(a) levels.

Volker J J Schettler, Class L Neumann, Christian Peter, Thomas Zimmermann, Ulrich Julius, Eberhard Roeseler, Franz Heigl
{"title":"Impact of the German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (DLAR) on therapeutic options to reduce increased Lp(a) levels.","authors":"Volker J J Schettler,&nbsp;Class L Neumann,&nbsp;Christian Peter,&nbsp;Thomas Zimmermann,&nbsp;Ulrich Julius,&nbsp;Eberhard Roeseler,&nbsp;Franz Heigl","doi":"10.1007/s11789-015-0073-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (DLAR) has been initiated by members of the Nephrology Foundation (WiNe), the German association of kidney centres (DN), the German society of nephrology (DGfN) and additional medical associations taking part in the apheresis working group. Its goal is the introduction of a substantial database, suitable to provide statistical evidence for the assessment of extracorporeal procedures. Data have been added to the DLAR since October 2011. In this article, preliminary results are first reported.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Data are stored on a secured Internet platform. The recorded information comprises mean values and rates of change in lipid levels (cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) before and after apheresis therapy, blood/plasma volume, frequency and type of adverse effects, medication, vascular events, diagnoses and comorbidity. It is collected by participating apheresis centres from all over Germany. Up until October 2014, a total of 7946 lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatments of 991 patients (787 with documented LDL-C and 688 with documented Lp(a) levels) via 96 medical accounts were documented and analysed. The current share of Lp(a) patients is 50.6 % (Lp(a) ≥ 60 mg/dl; n = 348/688). For both LDL-C and Lp(a), lowering rates exceeding 60 % have been observed. Likely in conjunction with these reduction rates, the preliminary analysis shows a 90 % decline in major adverse coronary events (MACE) as well as a decrease in major adverse non-coronary events (MANCE) by 69 %. As before, good tolerability and low rates of adverse effects (< 3 %) of LA therapy were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available numbers suggest in parts very good response by the participating centres to the DLAR. Unfortunately, there are also centres that have not documented any patients so far or LA treatments at all. The benchmark values for reduction rates in lipoprotein concentration required by the directives of the German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) have all been met. The decrease in MACE and MANCE rates currently observed is very promising. However, the comparably short runtime of the registry does not allow for high confidence in the current results. Certainly, reliable data will be extractable in the coming years. Given the high interest expressed by European neighbours, the extension of the registry to the European level should be a future goal for the DLAR as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":39208,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements","volume":"10 ","pages":"14-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11789-015-0073-1","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11789-015-0073-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (DLAR) has been initiated by members of the Nephrology Foundation (WiNe), the German association of kidney centres (DN), the German society of nephrology (DGfN) and additional medical associations taking part in the apheresis working group. Its goal is the introduction of a substantial database, suitable to provide statistical evidence for the assessment of extracorporeal procedures. Data have been added to the DLAR since October 2011. In this article, preliminary results are first reported.

Methods and results: Data are stored on a secured Internet platform. The recorded information comprises mean values and rates of change in lipid levels (cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) before and after apheresis therapy, blood/plasma volume, frequency and type of adverse effects, medication, vascular events, diagnoses and comorbidity. It is collected by participating apheresis centres from all over Germany. Up until October 2014, a total of 7946 lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatments of 991 patients (787 with documented LDL-C and 688 with documented Lp(a) levels) via 96 medical accounts were documented and analysed. The current share of Lp(a) patients is 50.6 % (Lp(a) ≥ 60 mg/dl; n = 348/688). For both LDL-C and Lp(a), lowering rates exceeding 60 % have been observed. Likely in conjunction with these reduction rates, the preliminary analysis shows a 90 % decline in major adverse coronary events (MACE) as well as a decrease in major adverse non-coronary events (MANCE) by 69 %. As before, good tolerability and low rates of adverse effects (< 3 %) of LA therapy were found.

Conclusions: The available numbers suggest in parts very good response by the participating centres to the DLAR. Unfortunately, there are also centres that have not documented any patients so far or LA treatments at all. The benchmark values for reduction rates in lipoprotein concentration required by the directives of the German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) have all been met. The decrease in MACE and MANCE rates currently observed is very promising. However, the comparably short runtime of the registry does not allow for high confidence in the current results. Certainly, reliable data will be extractable in the coming years. Given the high interest expressed by European neighbours, the extension of the registry to the European level should be a future goal for the DLAR as well.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德国脂蛋白分离注册(DLAR)对降低Lp(a)水平升高的治疗选择的影响
背景:德国脂蛋白单采登记(DLAR)是由肾脏病基金会(WiNe)、德国肾脏中心协会(DN)、德国肾脏病学会(DGfN)和参与单采工作组的其他医学协会的成员发起的。其目标是引入一个实质性的数据库,适合为评估体外手术提供统计证据。数据自2011年10月起被添加到DLAR。本文首次报道了初步结果。方法和结果:数据存储在安全的互联网平台上。记录的信息包括采血治疗前后血脂水平(胆固醇、甘油三酯、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、脂蛋白(a) (Lp(a))的平均值和变化率、血/血浆容量、不良反应的频率和类型、药物、血管事件、诊断和合并症。它是由来自德国各地的参与采血中心收集的。截至2014年10月,通过96个医疗账户记录和分析了991名患者(787名LDL-C记录在案,688名Lp(a)水平记录在案)的7946例脂蛋白单采(LA)治疗。目前Lp(a)患者的比例为50.6% (Lp(a)≥60 mg/dl;n = 348/688)。LDL-C和Lp(a)的降低率均超过60%。可能与这些降低率相结合,初步分析显示主要不良冠状动脉事件(MACE)下降了90%,主要不良非冠状动脉事件(MANCE)下降了69%。和以前一样,良好的耐受性和低的不良反应率(结论:现有的数字表明,部分参与中心对DLAR的反应非常好。不幸的是,到目前为止,也有一些中心没有记录任何患者或LA治疗。德国联邦联合委员会(G-BA)指令要求的脂蛋白浓度降低率的基准值都得到了满足。目前观察到的MACE和MANCE率的下降是非常有希望的。但是,注册表的运行时间相对较短,因此不能对当前结果有很高的置信度。当然,可靠的数据将在未来几年被提取出来。鉴于欧洲邻国表示的高度兴趣,将登记处扩大到欧洲一级也应是DLAR的一个未来目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lipoprotein apheresis is an optimal therapeutic option to reduce increased Lp(a) levels. Is lipoprotein(a) a risk factor for ischemic stroke and venous thromboembolism? Lipoprotein(a) and mortality-a high risk relationship. Lipoprotein(a) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. Lipoprotein(a)-an interdisciplinary challenge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1