Lipoprotein(a) and mortality-a high risk relationship.

Reinhard Klingel, Andreas Heibges, Cordula Fassbender
{"title":"Lipoprotein(a) and mortality-a high risk relationship.","authors":"Reinhard Klingel,&nbsp;Andreas Heibges,&nbsp;Cordula Fassbender","doi":"10.1007/s11789-019-00095-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent cardiovascular risk factor playing a causal role for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Early or progressive ASCVD or a familial predisposition are key findings which can be associated with Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP). The German guideline for the indication of lipoprotein apheresis in patients with Lp(a)-HLP has proved to be of value to identify patients at highest risk, using the composite of a Lp(a) threshold >60 mg/dl (>120 nmol/l) and clinical ASCVD progression despite effective LDL-C lowering therapy. In particular for such patients it appears to be plausible that Lp(a)-associated risk would increase cardiovascular mortality as the most important part of total mortality in Western populations. By the majority of existing investigations an association of Lp(a) concentration on total or cardiovascular mortality was demonstrated. However, inconsistency in the findings between studies exists without a clear trend for any study feature to explain this. Genetic homogeneity of the population, long-term follow-up, and clinically guided selection of patients might be important to further clarify the impact of Lp(a) concentration on progression of ASCVD, and finally total or cardiovascular mortality. LDL and Lp(a) particles exhibit a mutual effect modification on related ASCVD risk. Therefore, LDL-C levels and concomitant LDL-C lowering treatment must be considered in this context. Prospective evaluation is needed to document that specific Lp(a)-lowering additional to targeted LDL-C lowering will in fact reduce cardiovascular or total mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":39208,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements","volume":"14 Suppl 1","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11789-019-00095-3","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11789-019-00095-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent cardiovascular risk factor playing a causal role for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Early or progressive ASCVD or a familial predisposition are key findings which can be associated with Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia (Lp(a)-HLP). The German guideline for the indication of lipoprotein apheresis in patients with Lp(a)-HLP has proved to be of value to identify patients at highest risk, using the composite of a Lp(a) threshold >60 mg/dl (>120 nmol/l) and clinical ASCVD progression despite effective LDL-C lowering therapy. In particular for such patients it appears to be plausible that Lp(a)-associated risk would increase cardiovascular mortality as the most important part of total mortality in Western populations. By the majority of existing investigations an association of Lp(a) concentration on total or cardiovascular mortality was demonstrated. However, inconsistency in the findings between studies exists without a clear trend for any study feature to explain this. Genetic homogeneity of the population, long-term follow-up, and clinically guided selection of patients might be important to further clarify the impact of Lp(a) concentration on progression of ASCVD, and finally total or cardiovascular mortality. LDL and Lp(a) particles exhibit a mutual effect modification on related ASCVD risk. Therefore, LDL-C levels and concomitant LDL-C lowering treatment must be considered in this context. Prospective evaluation is needed to document that specific Lp(a)-lowering additional to targeted LDL-C lowering will in fact reduce cardiovascular or total mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脂蛋白(a)与死亡率-高危险关系。
脂蛋白(a) (Lp(a))是一个独立的心血管危险因素,在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)中起着因果作用。早期或进行性ASCVD或家族性易感性是与Lp(a)-高脂蛋白血症(Lp(a)-HLP)相关的关键发现。德国Lp(a)-HLP患者的脂蛋白采血适应症指南已被证明对识别高风险患者有价值,使用Lp(a)阈值>60 mg/dl(>120 nmol/l)和临床ASCVD进展的组合,尽管有效的LDL-C降低治疗。特别是对于这类患者,Lp(a)相关风险增加心血管死亡率似乎是合理的,因为心血管死亡率是西方人群总死亡率中最重要的部分。现有的大多数研究表明,Lp(a)浓度与总死亡率或心血管死亡率之间存在关联。然而,研究结果之间的不一致性存在,没有任何研究特征的明确趋势来解释这一点。人群的遗传同质性、长期随访和临床指导的患者选择可能对进一步阐明Lp(a)浓度对ASCVD进展的影响以及最终对总死亡率或心血管死亡率的影响很重要。LDL和Lp(a)颗粒对相关ASCVD风险表现出相互作用的改变。因此,在这种情况下,必须考虑LDL-C水平和伴随的LDL-C降低治疗。需要前瞻性评估来证明,除了靶向LDL-C降低外,特异性Lp(a)降低实际上会降低心血管或总死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements
Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lipoprotein apheresis is an optimal therapeutic option to reduce increased Lp(a) levels. Is lipoprotein(a) a risk factor for ischemic stroke and venous thromboembolism? Lipoprotein(a) and mortality-a high risk relationship. Lipoprotein(a) and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. Lipoprotein(a)-an interdisciplinary challenge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1