The Lived Experience of Multiple Sclerosis Relapse: How Adults with Multiple Sclerosis Processed Their Relapse Experience and Evaluated Their Need for Postrelapse Care.

IF 2.2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple Sclerosis International Pub Date : 2015-01-01 Epub Date: 2015-05-13 DOI:10.1155/2015/351416
Miho Asano, Karli Hawken, Merrill Turpin, Abby Eitzen, Marcia Finlayson
{"title":"The Lived Experience of Multiple Sclerosis Relapse: How Adults with Multiple Sclerosis Processed Their Relapse Experience and Evaluated Their Need for Postrelapse Care.","authors":"Miho Asano,&nbsp;Karli Hawken,&nbsp;Merrill Turpin,&nbsp;Abby Eitzen,&nbsp;Marcia Finlayson","doi":"10.1155/2015/351416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses can take a toll on individuals' health and quality of life. Given such consequences of relapses, postrelapse care beyond pharmacological approaches may play an important role in recovery. Nevertheless, how individuals with MS process their relapse experience and manage the consequences is still uncertain. Purpose. We conducted a qualitative study to understand relapse experiences and postrelapse care need from perspectives of adults with MS and identify relapse management patterns. Methods. We interviewed 17 adults with MS. Results. By examining combinations of three categories related to relapse experience, we identified four relapse management patterns: (i) Active Relapse Manager, (ii) Early-Stage Proactive Relapse Monitor, (iii) Adapted Passive Relapse Manager, and (iv) Passive Relapse Monitor. The relapse management patterns appear to associate strongly with the appraisal of the experience. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest the importance of understanding each patient beyond their functional limitations and the potential need for multidisciplinary postrelapse care which goes past restoring functional limitations at the acute phase. Future research to further understand the relapse management process at all stages of the healthcare continuum is a crucial step toward developing strategies to advance the current postrelapse care and to facilitate optimal recovery. </p>","PeriodicalId":46096,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis International","volume":"2015 ","pages":"351416"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/351416","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/351416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Background. Multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses can take a toll on individuals' health and quality of life. Given such consequences of relapses, postrelapse care beyond pharmacological approaches may play an important role in recovery. Nevertheless, how individuals with MS process their relapse experience and manage the consequences is still uncertain. Purpose. We conducted a qualitative study to understand relapse experiences and postrelapse care need from perspectives of adults with MS and identify relapse management patterns. Methods. We interviewed 17 adults with MS. Results. By examining combinations of three categories related to relapse experience, we identified four relapse management patterns: (i) Active Relapse Manager, (ii) Early-Stage Proactive Relapse Monitor, (iii) Adapted Passive Relapse Manager, and (iv) Passive Relapse Monitor. The relapse management patterns appear to associate strongly with the appraisal of the experience. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest the importance of understanding each patient beyond their functional limitations and the potential need for multidisciplinary postrelapse care which goes past restoring functional limitations at the acute phase. Future research to further understand the relapse management process at all stages of the healthcare continuum is a crucial step toward developing strategies to advance the current postrelapse care and to facilitate optimal recovery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性硬化症复发的生活经历:多发性硬化症成人如何处理他们的复发经历并评估他们对复发后护理的需求。
背景。多发性硬化症(MS)的复发会对个人的健康和生活质量造成损害。考虑到这些复发的后果,药物治疗之外的复发后护理可能在康复中发挥重要作用。然而,多发性硬化症患者如何处理他们的复发经历和处理后果仍然不确定。目的。我们进行了一项定性研究,从成人多发性硬化症患者的角度了解复发经历和复发后护理需求,并确定复发管理模式。方法。我们采访了17名患有多发性硬化症的成年人。通过检查与复发经验相关的三类组合,我们确定了四种复发管理模式:(i)主动复发管理,(ii)早期主动复发监测,(iii)适应性被动复发管理,(iv)被动复发监测。复发管理模式似乎与对经历的评价密切相关。结论。这项研究的结果表明,了解每个病人的重要性,超越他们的功能限制和潜在的需要多学科的复发后护理,超过恢复功能限制在急性期。未来的研究将进一步了解在医疗连续体的各个阶段的复发管理过程,这是制定策略以推进当前复发后护理和促进最佳恢复的关键一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis International
Multiple Sclerosis International CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of multiple sclerosis, including clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, therapeutics, genetics, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, psychology and neurorehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
White Matter Lesion Volumes on 3-T MRI in People With MS Who Had Followed a Diet and Lifestyle Program for More Than 10 Years. Pulp Sensitivity Testing in Multiple Sclerosis: Disease Duration and Sensory/Motor Associations-A Cross-Sectional Study. Brain Atrophy as an Outcome of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Remitting-Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. Cognitive Contributors of Backward Walking in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis. Patient and Clinician Perspectives of Physical Therapy for Walking Difficulties in Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1