Results of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype identification by Salmonella Check&Trace microarray in international External Quality Assurance Systems.

Grzegorz Madaczak, Jolanta Szych, Monika Wasiak
{"title":"Results of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype identification by Salmonella Check&Trace microarray in international External Quality Assurance Systems.","authors":"Grzegorz Madaczak,&nbsp;Jolanta Szych,&nbsp;Monika Wasiak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traditionally Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotypes are identified by slide agglutination with specific antisera for somatic, flagellar and sometimes capsular antigens. An alternative way is genoserotyping using for example a microarray, eg. commercially available test Check&Trace Salmonella. The goal of this study was to evaluate the Check&Trace Salmonella microarray for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype identification, using Salmonella strains provided by reference laboratories during External Quality Assurance Systems organized for national reference laboratories by ECDC and WHO GFN.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>80 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica have been tested using Check & Trace Salmonella (Check-Points BC, Netherlands). Also classical slide agglutination was performed according to EN ISO 6579:2003/Al:2007 norm, used as reference method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the group of 80 tested strains, 66% were identified correctly, 4% gave uncertain results and 29% showed \"Salmonella, genovar\" without a serotype, of which 69% were not included in the CTS list of serotypes. Finally one strain has been recognized incorrectly.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Because of IVD certification lack, the CTS test could not be recommended to clinical laboratories. AOAC-RI and OIE certification for test cause, that CTS could be used in most food, environmental and veterinary laboratories with the condition, that all unrecognized strains should be sent to a reference laboratory, to type according to EN ISO 6579:2003/Al:2007 norm, by KWM serotyping or other equal alternative methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":18521,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","volume":"67 1","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Traditionally Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotypes are identified by slide agglutination with specific antisera for somatic, flagellar and sometimes capsular antigens. An alternative way is genoserotyping using for example a microarray, eg. commercially available test Check&Trace Salmonella. The goal of this study was to evaluate the Check&Trace Salmonella microarray for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype identification, using Salmonella strains provided by reference laboratories during External Quality Assurance Systems organized for national reference laboratories by ECDC and WHO GFN.

Material and methods: 80 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica have been tested using Check & Trace Salmonella (Check-Points BC, Netherlands). Also classical slide agglutination was performed according to EN ISO 6579:2003/Al:2007 norm, used as reference method.

Results: In the group of 80 tested strains, 66% were identified correctly, 4% gave uncertain results and 29% showed "Salmonella, genovar" without a serotype, of which 69% were not included in the CTS list of serotypes. Finally one strain has been recognized incorrectly.

Discussion: Because of IVD certification lack, the CTS test could not be recommended to clinical laboratories. AOAC-RI and OIE certification for test cause, that CTS could be used in most food, environmental and veterinary laboratories with the condition, that all unrecognized strains should be sent to a reference laboratory, to type according to EN ISO 6579:2003/Al:2007 norm, by KWM serotyping or other equal alternative methods.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠道沙门氏菌亚群检测结果;国际外部质量保证体系中沙门氏菌检测与微量芯片的肠道血清型鉴定。
简介:传统的肠沙门氏菌亚种。肠道的血清型是通过玻片凝集与特定的抗血清体,鞭毛,有时荚膜抗原。另一种方法是基因分型,例如使用微阵列。市售检测检查和追踪沙门氏菌。本研究的目的是评估检查与追踪沙门氏菌芯片对肠道沙门氏菌亚种的检测效果。在ECDC和世卫组织GFN为国家参考实验室组织的外部质量保证系统期间,使用参考实验室提供的沙门氏菌菌株进行肠道血清型鉴定。材料与方法:80株肠沙门氏菌亚群;使用检查和追踪沙门氏菌(荷兰BC省检查点)对大肠杆菌进行了检测。并按EN ISO 6579:2003/Al:2007标准进行经典玻片凝集,作为参考方法。结果:80株检测菌株中,66%鉴定正确,4%结果不确定,29%显示无血清型的“genovar沙门氏菌”,其中69%不在CTS血清型列表中。最后,有一种菌株被错误地识别了。讨论:由于缺乏IVD认证,CTS检测不能推荐给临床实验室。AOAC-RI和OIE认证的测试原因,CTS可以在大多数食品,环境和兽医实验室使用,条件是所有未识别的菌株应送到参考实验室,根据EN ISO 6579:2003/Al:2007标准,通过金华血清分型或其他同等替代方法进行分型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Diagnostic difficulties in amebic liver abscess]. [Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from surgical site infections of patients in southern Poland]. [Serological and molecular methods in diagnostics of primary acute hepatitis caused with human herpesvirus type 6 - a case report]. [The prevalence of human papillomaviruses in patients with colon polyps]. [The occurrence of infections caused by Francisella tularensis in humans in Poland and laboratory diagnosis of tularemia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1