Results of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype identification by Salmonella Check&Trace microarray in international External Quality Assurance Systems.
{"title":"Results of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype identification by Salmonella Check&Trace microarray in international External Quality Assurance Systems.","authors":"Grzegorz Madaczak, Jolanta Szych, Monika Wasiak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Traditionally Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotypes are identified by slide agglutination with specific antisera for somatic, flagellar and sometimes capsular antigens. An alternative way is genoserotyping using for example a microarray, eg. commercially available test Check&Trace Salmonella. The goal of this study was to evaluate the Check&Trace Salmonella microarray for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype identification, using Salmonella strains provided by reference laboratories during External Quality Assurance Systems organized for national reference laboratories by ECDC and WHO GFN.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>80 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica have been tested using Check & Trace Salmonella (Check-Points BC, Netherlands). Also classical slide agglutination was performed according to EN ISO 6579:2003/Al:2007 norm, used as reference method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the group of 80 tested strains, 66% were identified correctly, 4% gave uncertain results and 29% showed \"Salmonella, genovar\" without a serotype, of which 69% were not included in the CTS list of serotypes. Finally one strain has been recognized incorrectly.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Because of IVD certification lack, the CTS test could not be recommended to clinical laboratories. AOAC-RI and OIE certification for test cause, that CTS could be used in most food, environmental and veterinary laboratories with the condition, that all unrecognized strains should be sent to a reference laboratory, to type according to EN ISO 6579:2003/Al:2007 norm, by KWM serotyping or other equal alternative methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":18521,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","volume":"67 1","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Traditionally Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotypes are identified by slide agglutination with specific antisera for somatic, flagellar and sometimes capsular antigens. An alternative way is genoserotyping using for example a microarray, eg. commercially available test Check&Trace Salmonella. The goal of this study was to evaluate the Check&Trace Salmonella microarray for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serotype identification, using Salmonella strains provided by reference laboratories during External Quality Assurance Systems organized for national reference laboratories by ECDC and WHO GFN.
Material and methods: 80 Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica have been tested using Check & Trace Salmonella (Check-Points BC, Netherlands). Also classical slide agglutination was performed according to EN ISO 6579:2003/Al:2007 norm, used as reference method.
Results: In the group of 80 tested strains, 66% were identified correctly, 4% gave uncertain results and 29% showed "Salmonella, genovar" without a serotype, of which 69% were not included in the CTS list of serotypes. Finally one strain has been recognized incorrectly.
Discussion: Because of IVD certification lack, the CTS test could not be recommended to clinical laboratories. AOAC-RI and OIE certification for test cause, that CTS could be used in most food, environmental and veterinary laboratories with the condition, that all unrecognized strains should be sent to a reference laboratory, to type according to EN ISO 6579:2003/Al:2007 norm, by KWM serotyping or other equal alternative methods.
简介:传统的肠沙门氏菌亚种。肠道的血清型是通过玻片凝集与特定的抗血清体,鞭毛,有时荚膜抗原。另一种方法是基因分型,例如使用微阵列。市售检测检查和追踪沙门氏菌。本研究的目的是评估检查与追踪沙门氏菌芯片对肠道沙门氏菌亚种的检测效果。在ECDC和世卫组织GFN为国家参考实验室组织的外部质量保证系统期间,使用参考实验室提供的沙门氏菌菌株进行肠道血清型鉴定。材料与方法:80株肠沙门氏菌亚群;使用检查和追踪沙门氏菌(荷兰BC省检查点)对大肠杆菌进行了检测。并按EN ISO 6579:2003/Al:2007标准进行经典玻片凝集,作为参考方法。结果:80株检测菌株中,66%鉴定正确,4%结果不确定,29%显示无血清型的“genovar沙门氏菌”,其中69%不在CTS血清型列表中。最后,有一种菌株被错误地识别了。讨论:由于缺乏IVD认证,CTS检测不能推荐给临床实验室。AOAC-RI和OIE认证的测试原因,CTS可以在大多数食品,环境和兽医实验室使用,条件是所有未识别的菌株应送到参考实验室,根据EN ISO 6579:2003/Al:2007标准,通过金华血清分型或其他同等替代方法进行分型。