Accurate Critical Stress Intensity Factor Griffith Crack Theory Measurements by Numerical Techniques.

IF 0.2 4区 材料科学 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY SAMPE Journal Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Richard C Petersen
{"title":"Accurate Critical Stress Intensity Factor Griffith Crack Theory Measurements by Numerical Techniques.","authors":"Richard C Petersen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critical stress intensity factor (K<sub>Ic</sub>) has been an approximation for fracture toughness using only load-cell measurements. However, artificial man-made cracks several orders of magnitude longer and wider than natural flaws have required a correction factor term (Y) that can be up to about 3 times the recorded experimental value [1-3]. In fact, over 30 years ago a National Academy of Sciences advisory board stated that empirical K<sub>Ic</sub> testing was of serious concern and further requested that an accurate bulk fracture toughness method be found [4]. Now that fracture toughness can be calculated accurately by numerical integration from the load/deflection curve as resilience, work of fracture (WOF) and strain energy release (S<sub>Ic</sub>) [5, 6], K<sub>Ic</sub> appears to be unnecessary. However, the large body of previous K<sub>Ic</sub> experimental test results found in the literature offer the opportunity for continued meta analysis with other more practical and accurate fracture toughness results using energy methods and numerical integration. Therefore, K<sub>Ic</sub> is derived from the classical Griffith Crack Theory [6] to include S<sub>Ic</sub> as a more accurate term for strain energy release rate (𝒢<sub>Ic</sub>), along with crack surface energy (γ), crack length (a), modulus (E), applied stress (σ), Y, crack-tip plastic zone defect region (r<sub>p</sub>) and yield strength (σ<sub>ys</sub>) that can all be determined from load and deflection data. Polymer matrix discontinuous quartz fiber-reinforced composites to accentuate toughness differences were prepared for flexural mechanical testing comprising of 3 mm fibers at different volume percentages from 0-54.0 vol% and at 28.2 vol% with different fiber lengths from 0.0-6.0 mm. Results provided a new correction factor and regression analyses between several numerical integration fracture toughness test methods to support K<sub>Ic</sub> results. Further, bulk K<sub>Ic</sub> accurate experimental values are compared with empirical test results found in literature. Also, several fracture toughness mechanisms are discussed especially for fiber-reinforced composites.</p>","PeriodicalId":49577,"journal":{"name":"SAMPE Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4302413/pdf/nihms648034.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAMPE Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Critical stress intensity factor (KIc) has been an approximation for fracture toughness using only load-cell measurements. However, artificial man-made cracks several orders of magnitude longer and wider than natural flaws have required a correction factor term (Y) that can be up to about 3 times the recorded experimental value [1-3]. In fact, over 30 years ago a National Academy of Sciences advisory board stated that empirical KIc testing was of serious concern and further requested that an accurate bulk fracture toughness method be found [4]. Now that fracture toughness can be calculated accurately by numerical integration from the load/deflection curve as resilience, work of fracture (WOF) and strain energy release (SIc) [5, 6], KIc appears to be unnecessary. However, the large body of previous KIc experimental test results found in the literature offer the opportunity for continued meta analysis with other more practical and accurate fracture toughness results using energy methods and numerical integration. Therefore, KIc is derived from the classical Griffith Crack Theory [6] to include SIc as a more accurate term for strain energy release rate (𝒢Ic), along with crack surface energy (γ), crack length (a), modulus (E), applied stress (σ), Y, crack-tip plastic zone defect region (rp) and yield strength (σys) that can all be determined from load and deflection data. Polymer matrix discontinuous quartz fiber-reinforced composites to accentuate toughness differences were prepared for flexural mechanical testing comprising of 3 mm fibers at different volume percentages from 0-54.0 vol% and at 28.2 vol% with different fiber lengths from 0.0-6.0 mm. Results provided a new correction factor and regression analyses between several numerical integration fracture toughness test methods to support KIc results. Further, bulk KIc accurate experimental values are compared with empirical test results found in literature. Also, several fracture toughness mechanisms are discussed especially for fiber-reinforced composites.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临界应力强度因子Griffith裂纹理论的精确数值测量。
临界应力强度因子(KIc)是仅使用称重传感器测量断裂韧性的近似值。然而,比天然缺陷长和宽几个数量级的人工裂缝需要校正因子项(Y),可达记录实验值的约3倍[1-3]。事实上,早在30多年前,美国国家科学院顾问委员会就指出,经验性KIc测试非常值得关注,并进一步要求找到一种准确的体断裂韧性方法[4]。既然断裂韧性可以通过载荷/挠度曲线的数值积分精确计算为弹性、断裂功(WOF)和应变能释放(SIc)[5,6],那么KIc似乎就没有必要了。然而,文献中发现的大量先前的KIc实验测试结果为继续使用能量方法和数值积分与其他更实用和准确的断裂韧性结果进行meta分析提供了机会。因此,KIc由经典的Griffith裂纹理论[6]衍生而来,将SIc作为应变能释放率的更准确术语(𝒢Ic),以及裂纹表面能(γ),裂纹长度(a),模量(E),施加应力(σ), Y,裂纹尖端塑性区缺陷区域(rp)和屈服强度(σys),这些都可以从载荷和挠度数据中确定。制备了聚合物基不连续石英纤维增强复合材料,以加强韧性差异,并进行了弯曲力学试验,该复合材料由3 mm纤维组成,体积百分比为0- 54.0%,体积百分比为28.2,纤维长度为0-6.0 mm。研究结果为几种数值积分断裂韧性测试方法提供了新的校正因子和回归分析,支持了KIc测试结果。进一步,将体积KIc的精确实验值与文献中发现的经验测试结果进行了比较。此外,还讨论了几种断裂韧性机制,特别是纤维增强复合材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SAMPE Journal
SAMPE Journal 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
0.16
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: SAMPE Journal readers represent the diversity of the advanced materials and processes industry. Our readers are creative and innovative, they publish, they develop concepts, they win patents, they move the world of materials and processes. Join thought leaders – academicians, engineers, scientists, business leaders, researchers, suppliers, manufacturers – and become a reader of the industry’s only technical journal dedicated to advanced materials and processes.
期刊最新文献
Design of Extruder with Metering Section Removed and Replaced with Gear Pump for Machine Space Savings in Large Format Additive Manufacturing Comparative Analysis of Water-Induced Response in 3D-Printed SCF/ABS Composites under Controlled Diffusion Additive Manufacturing Process Simulation of Laser Powder Bed Fusion and Benchmarks Electroplating Additively Manufactured Honeycomb Structures to Increase Energy Absorption Under Quasi-Static Crush Five-Axis Additive Manufacturing of a Thermoset Composite Formulation for Thermal Protection Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1