Audience-response systems for evaluation of pediatric lectures--comparison with a classic end-of-term online-based evaluation.

GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung Pub Date : 2015-05-13 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma000960
Sebastian Felix Nepomuk Bode, Christine Straub, Marianne Giesler, Silke Biller, Johannes Forster, Marcus Krüger
{"title":"Audience-response systems for evaluation of pediatric lectures--comparison with a classic end-of-term online-based evaluation.","authors":"Sebastian Felix Nepomuk Bode,&nbsp;Christine Straub,&nbsp;Marianne Giesler,&nbsp;Silke Biller,&nbsp;Johannes Forster,&nbsp;Marcus Krüger","doi":"10.3205/zma000960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Course evaluations are often conducted and analyzed well after the course has taken place. By using a digital audience response system (ARS), it is possible to collect, view and discuss feedback during or directly following a course or lecture session. This paper analyzes a student evaluation of a lecture course with ARS to determine if significant differences exist between the results of the ARS lecture evaluation and those of the online evaluation at the end of the semester. In terms of the overall evaluation, consideration is given to the level of students' prior knowledge, the presentation of the lecture material by the lecturers and the relevance of the lecture topic for students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>During the 2011-12 winter semester, the lecture on Pediatrics at the Freiburg Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin (ZKJ) Freiburg) was evaluated using ARS. Thirty-four lectures were evaluated by an average of 22 (range 8-44) students, who responded to four questions each time an evaluation took place.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On a 6-point Likert scale (1=very good to 6=deficient), the students rated their level of preparedness with a mean of 3.18, the presentation of the lecture with 2.44, and the relevance of the lecture topic with 2.19. The overall evaluation of the lecture course by means of ARS resulted in 2.31. The online evaluation conducted at the end of the semester yielded a score of 2.45. Highly significant correlations were seen between the results of the ARS for the overall evaluation, assessment of prior knowledge, lecture presentation, and the estimated relevance of the lecture topic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of ARS is suitable for immediate evaluation of lectures, in particular regarding timely feedback for the individual lecturer/lecturers. In comparison with an end-of-term evaluation, ARS yielded a better assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"32 2","pages":"Doc18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000960","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Aim: Course evaluations are often conducted and analyzed well after the course has taken place. By using a digital audience response system (ARS), it is possible to collect, view and discuss feedback during or directly following a course or lecture session. This paper analyzes a student evaluation of a lecture course with ARS to determine if significant differences exist between the results of the ARS lecture evaluation and those of the online evaluation at the end of the semester. In terms of the overall evaluation, consideration is given to the level of students' prior knowledge, the presentation of the lecture material by the lecturers and the relevance of the lecture topic for students.

Method: During the 2011-12 winter semester, the lecture on Pediatrics at the Freiburg Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine (Zentrum für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin (ZKJ) Freiburg) was evaluated using ARS. Thirty-four lectures were evaluated by an average of 22 (range 8-44) students, who responded to four questions each time an evaluation took place.

Results: On a 6-point Likert scale (1=very good to 6=deficient), the students rated their level of preparedness with a mean of 3.18, the presentation of the lecture with 2.44, and the relevance of the lecture topic with 2.19. The overall evaluation of the lecture course by means of ARS resulted in 2.31. The online evaluation conducted at the end of the semester yielded a score of 2.45. Highly significant correlations were seen between the results of the ARS for the overall evaluation, assessment of prior knowledge, lecture presentation, and the estimated relevance of the lecture topic.

Conclusion: The use of ARS is suitable for immediate evaluation of lectures, in particular regarding timely feedback for the individual lecturer/lecturers. In comparison with an end-of-term evaluation, ARS yielded a better assessment.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于儿科讲座评估的听众反应系统——与经典期末在线评估的比较
目的:课程评估通常是在课程开始后进行和分析的。通过使用数字观众响应系统(ARS),可以在课程或讲座期间或之后直接收集、查看和讨论反馈。本文分析了学生对ARS授课课程的评价,以确定ARS授课评估的结果与期末在线评估的结果是否存在显著差异。在整体评价方面,考虑学生的先验知识水平、讲师对讲课材料的呈现以及讲课主题对学生的相关性。方法:对2011- 2012年冬季学期Freiburg儿科和青少年医学中心(Zentrum f r Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, ZKJ)的儿科讲座进行ARS评价。34个讲座由平均22名(范围8-44)学生评估,每次评估时他们回答4个问题。结果:在6分李克特量表(1=非常好到6=不足)上,学生们对自己的准备水平的平均评分为3.18分,讲座的呈现为2.44分,讲座主题的相关性为2.19分。通过ARS对讲座课程进行综合评价,得到2.31分。学期末进行的在线评估得分为2.45分。ARS的结果在总体评估、先验知识评估、演讲呈现和演讲主题的估计相关性之间具有高度显著的相关性。结论:ARS的使用适用于讲座的即时评估,特别是对个别讲师/讲师的及时反馈。与期末评估相比,ARS的评估结果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
8th meeting of the medical assessment consortium UCAN: "Collaborative Perspectives for Competency-based and Quality-assured Medical Assessment". Influence of a revision course and the gender of examiners on the grades of the final ENT exam--a retrospective review of 3961 exams. The Final Oral/Practical State Examination at Freiburg Medical Faculty in 2012--Analysis of grading to test quality assurance. The new final Clinical Skills examination in human medicine in Switzerland: Essential steps of exam development, implementation and evaluation, and central insights from the perspective of the national Working Group. Electronic acquisition of OSCE performance using tablets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1