ORGANIC VS CONVENTIONAL: SOIL NEMATODE COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION.

C Kapp, S G Storey, A P Malan
{"title":"ORGANIC VS CONVENTIONAL: SOIL NEMATODE COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION.","authors":"C Kapp,&nbsp;S G Storey,&nbsp;A P Malan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Global increases in human population are creating an ever-greater need for food production. Poor soil management practices have degraded soil to such an extent that rapidly improved management practices is the only way to ensure future food demands. In South Africa, deciduous fruit producers are realising the need for soil health, and for an increased understanding of the benefits of soil ecology, to ensure sustainable fruit production. This depends heavily on improved orchard management. Conventional farming relies on the addition of artificial fertilizers, and the application of chemicals, to prevent or minimise, the effects of the soil stages of pest insects, and of plant-parasitic nematodes. Currently, there is resistance toward conventional farming practices, which, it is believed, diminishes biodiversity within the soil. The study aimed to establish the soil nematode community structure and function in organically, and conventionally, managed deciduous fruit orchards. This was done by determining the abundance, the diversity, and the functionality of the naturally occurring free-living, and plant-parasitic, nematodes in deciduous fruit orchards in the Western Cape province of South Africa. The objective of the study was to form the basis for the use of nematodes as future indicators of soil health in deciduous fruit orchards. Orchards from neighbouring organic, and conventional, apricot farms, and from an organic apple orchard, were studied. All the nematodes were quantified, and identified, to family level. The five nematode-classified trophic groups were found at each site, while 14 families were identified in each orchard, respectively. Herbivores were dominant in all the orchards surveyed. Organic apples had the fewest herbivores and fungivores, with the highest number of carnivores. When comparing organic with conventional apricot orchards, higher numbers of plant-parasitic nematodes were found in the organic apricot orchards. The Maturity Index (MI) indicated that all orchard soils had values below 1.5, indicating disturbed conditions. The conventionally managed apricot orchard had the highest MI value, of 1.48. The Plant Parasitic Index (PPI) value was highest in the organically managed apricot orchard. In order to determine the existing enrichment, structural, and basal conditions, the nematode faunal analysis was applied to each site. All the sites indicated enriched and structured conditions. Regarding the diversity, the richness, and the evenness of the distribution, soil from the conventional apricot orchard had the highest species richness, whereas the organic apple orchard soil had the most even distribution of families. Different management practices in fruit orchards did not show marked differences in terms of community composition and structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":10565,"journal":{"name":"Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences","volume":"79 2","pages":"297-300"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global increases in human population are creating an ever-greater need for food production. Poor soil management practices have degraded soil to such an extent that rapidly improved management practices is the only way to ensure future food demands. In South Africa, deciduous fruit producers are realising the need for soil health, and for an increased understanding of the benefits of soil ecology, to ensure sustainable fruit production. This depends heavily on improved orchard management. Conventional farming relies on the addition of artificial fertilizers, and the application of chemicals, to prevent or minimise, the effects of the soil stages of pest insects, and of plant-parasitic nematodes. Currently, there is resistance toward conventional farming practices, which, it is believed, diminishes biodiversity within the soil. The study aimed to establish the soil nematode community structure and function in organically, and conventionally, managed deciduous fruit orchards. This was done by determining the abundance, the diversity, and the functionality of the naturally occurring free-living, and plant-parasitic, nematodes in deciduous fruit orchards in the Western Cape province of South Africa. The objective of the study was to form the basis for the use of nematodes as future indicators of soil health in deciduous fruit orchards. Orchards from neighbouring organic, and conventional, apricot farms, and from an organic apple orchard, were studied. All the nematodes were quantified, and identified, to family level. The five nematode-classified trophic groups were found at each site, while 14 families were identified in each orchard, respectively. Herbivores were dominant in all the orchards surveyed. Organic apples had the fewest herbivores and fungivores, with the highest number of carnivores. When comparing organic with conventional apricot orchards, higher numbers of plant-parasitic nematodes were found in the organic apricot orchards. The Maturity Index (MI) indicated that all orchard soils had values below 1.5, indicating disturbed conditions. The conventionally managed apricot orchard had the highest MI value, of 1.48. The Plant Parasitic Index (PPI) value was highest in the organically managed apricot orchard. In order to determine the existing enrichment, structural, and basal conditions, the nematode faunal analysis was applied to each site. All the sites indicated enriched and structured conditions. Regarding the diversity, the richness, and the evenness of the distribution, soil from the conventional apricot orchard had the highest species richness, whereas the organic apple orchard soil had the most even distribution of families. Different management practices in fruit orchards did not show marked differences in terms of community composition and structure.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机与常规:土壤线虫群落结构与功能。
全球人口的增长对粮食生产的需求越来越大。不良的土壤管理方法使土壤退化到如此程度,以致迅速改进管理方法是确保未来粮食需求的唯一途径。在南非,落叶水果生产者正在认识到土壤健康的必要性,以及对土壤生态效益的进一步了解,以确保可持续的水果生产。这在很大程度上取决于果园管理的改善。传统农业依靠添加人工肥料和使用化学品来防止或尽量减少害虫和植物寄生线虫对土壤阶段的影响。目前,人们对传统的耕作方式产生了抵制,认为这种做法会减少土壤中的生物多样性。本研究旨在建立有机管理和常规管理的落叶果园土壤线虫群落结构和功能。这是通过测定南非西开普省落叶果园中自然发生的自由生活和植物寄生线虫的丰度、多样性和功能来完成的。本研究的目的是为今后利用线虫作为落叶果园土壤健康指标奠定基础。研究人员对邻近的有机果园、传统果园、杏树果园和有机苹果园的果园进行了研究。所有线虫都被量化并鉴定到科水平。在每个地点均发现线虫的5个营养类群,在每个果园分别鉴定出14个科。所有果园均以草食动物为主。有机苹果的食草动物和真菌动物最少,食肉动物最多。有机杏园与常规杏园比较,有机杏园植物寄生线虫数量较高。果园土壤成熟度指数(MI)均低于1.5,表明果园土壤受到干扰。常规管理杏园的MI值最高,为1.48。有机经营杏园植物寄生指数(PPI)最高。为了确定现有的富集、结构和基础条件,对每个站点进行了线虫区系分析。所有遗址均显示富集和构造条件。在物种多样性、丰富度和分布均匀性方面,常规杏园土壤的物种丰富度最高,有机苹果园土壤的科数分布最均匀。果园不同管理方式在群落组成和结构上无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acrylamide formation during frying of potatoes: thorough investigation on the influence of crop and process variables. LEACHING AND DEGRADATION OF 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXIACETIC ACID, IN COLOMBIA RICE FLOODED SOIL. MISCANTHUS X GIGANTEUS AS A NEW HIGHLY EFFICIENT PHYTOREMEDIATION AGENT FOR IMPROVING SOILS CONTAMINATED BY PESTICIDES RESIDUES AND SUPPLEMENTED CONTAMINANTS. THE BENTHIC COMMUNITIES COMPARISON BETWEEN ORGANIC AND CONVENTIONAL RICE FIELDS. DETERMINATION OF AZOXYSTROBIN AND DIFENOCONAZOLE IN PESTICIDE PRODUCTS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1