Comparison of CDHSG model and PCO2 in predicting mortality risk in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS Congenital Anomalies Pub Date : 2022-08-30 DOI:10.1111/cga.12491
Tülin Öztaş, Ahmet Dursun
{"title":"Comparison of CDHSG model and PCO2 in predicting mortality risk in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia","authors":"Tülin Öztaş,&nbsp;Ahmet Dursun","doi":"10.1111/cga.12491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is one of the illnesses with high mortality and morbidity rates. The study aims to compare the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group (CDHSG) model and PCO<sub>2</sub> in determining the mortality risk of CDH in the early postnatal period in neonates. The data of 35 patients who were treated CDH were analyzed retrospectively. The sex, gestational age, birth weight, delivery method, presence of chromosomal anomaly, congenital cardiac and other anomalies, pulmonary hypertension, the 5-min Apgar score, PCO<sub>2</sub> values of blood gas in the first 24 h, mode of ventilation were recorded. According to the CDHSG model, the mortality risk of CDH was divided into three categories: as low, moderate, high risk. Based on the blood gases in the first 24 h after delivery, the CDH mortality risk was considered in two categories as low and high. Based on the CDHSG model, the risk of CDH mortality was low in 11.4%, moderate in 20%, and high in 68.6%. Mortality rates were 0%, 42.8%, and 83.3%, respectively. Based on the PaCO<sub>2</sub>, the risk of CDH mortality was low in 37.1% of patients and high in 62.8%. The mortality rate was 86.3% in high-severity patients and 30.7% in low-risk patients. No significant difference was found between the area under the curve values of the CDHSG model and PCO<sub>2</sub>. Especially in developing countries, in cases where opportunities are limited, the severity of the disease, the need for more aggressive treatment, and the need for higher-level intensive care can be determined with the easily accessible and low-cost blood gas PCO<sub>2</sub> at the bedside.</p>","PeriodicalId":10626,"journal":{"name":"Congenital Anomalies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congenital Anomalies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cga.12491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is one of the illnesses with high mortality and morbidity rates. The study aims to compare the Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group (CDHSG) model and PCO2 in determining the mortality risk of CDH in the early postnatal period in neonates. The data of 35 patients who were treated CDH were analyzed retrospectively. The sex, gestational age, birth weight, delivery method, presence of chromosomal anomaly, congenital cardiac and other anomalies, pulmonary hypertension, the 5-min Apgar score, PCO2 values of blood gas in the first 24 h, mode of ventilation were recorded. According to the CDHSG model, the mortality risk of CDH was divided into three categories: as low, moderate, high risk. Based on the blood gases in the first 24 h after delivery, the CDH mortality risk was considered in two categories as low and high. Based on the CDHSG model, the risk of CDH mortality was low in 11.4%, moderate in 20%, and high in 68.6%. Mortality rates were 0%, 42.8%, and 83.3%, respectively. Based on the PaCO2, the risk of CDH mortality was low in 37.1% of patients and high in 62.8%. The mortality rate was 86.3% in high-severity patients and 30.7% in low-risk patients. No significant difference was found between the area under the curve values of the CDHSG model and PCO2. Especially in developing countries, in cases where opportunities are limited, the severity of the disease, the need for more aggressive treatment, and the need for higher-level intensive care can be determined with the easily accessible and low-cost blood gas PCO2 at the bedside.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CDHSG模型与PCO2预测先天性膈疝死亡风险的比较
先天性膈疝(CDH)是死亡率和发病率较高的疾病之一。本研究旨在比较先天性膈疝研究组(CDHSG)模型和PCO2模型对新生儿产后早期先天性膈疝死亡风险的影响。回顾性分析35例CDH患者的治疗资料。记录性别、胎龄、出生体重、分娩方式、是否存在染色体异常、先天性心脏等异常、肺动脉高压、5 min Apgar评分、前24 h血气PCO2值、通气方式。根据CDHSG模型,将CDH的死亡风险分为低、中、高风险三类。根据分娩后24小时的血气,将CDH死亡率分为低和高两类。基于CDHSG模型,CDH死亡率风险低为11.4%,中等为20%,高为68.6%。死亡率分别为0%、42.8%和83.3%。基于PaCO2, CDH死亡率风险低37.1%,高62.8%。重症患者死亡率为86.3%,低危患者死亡率为30.7%。CDHSG模型曲线下面积与PCO2值无显著差异。特别是在发展中国家,在机会有限的情况下,疾病的严重程度、是否需要更积极的治疗以及是否需要更高水平的重症监护可以通过床边容易获得和低成本的血气二氧化碳分压来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Congenital Anomalies
Congenital Anomalies PEDIATRICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Congenital Anomalies is the official English language journal of the Japanese Teratology Society, and publishes original articles in laboratory as well as clinical research in all areas of abnormal development and related fields, from all over the world. Although contributions by members of the teratology societies affiliated with The International Federation of Teratology Societies are given priority, contributions from non-members are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A safety signal for congenital strabismus associated with valproic acid: A pharmacovigilance analysis utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database Issue Information Pregnancy outcomes after first-trimester exposure to fluoroquinolones: Findings based on an integrated database from two Japanese institutions Frequency of gastroschisis and omphalocele and possible influence of maternal folic acid supplementation. A narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1