Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety between High-Power Short-Duration Ablation and Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of interventional cardiology Pub Date : 2022-08-16 DOI:10.1155/2022/6013474
Shuyu Jin, Lu Fu, Junrong Jiang, Xingdong Ye, Huiyi Liu, Yanlin Chen, Sijia Pu, Shulin Wu, Yumei Xue
{"title":"Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety between High-Power Short-Duration Ablation and Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Shuyu Jin,&nbsp;Lu Fu,&nbsp;Junrong Jiang,&nbsp;Xingdong Ye,&nbsp;Huiyi Liu,&nbsp;Yanlin Chen,&nbsp;Sijia Pu,&nbsp;Shulin Wu,&nbsp;Yumei Xue","doi":"10.1155/2022/6013474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Aim</i>. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety between high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and conventional RFA in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). <i>Methods</i>. Studies comparing HPSD and traditional applications in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation from inception through December 2021 were searched on Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov. <i>Results</i>. The meta-analysis included seventeen studies with a total of 4934 patients. HPSD group decreased procedure duration (mean difference (MD) −38.28 min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), RF duration (MD −20.51 min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), fluoroscopy duration (MD −5.19 min, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), and acute pulmonary vein reconnection (Odds ratio (OR) 0.40, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001), while improving the freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one year (OR 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–1.94, <i>P</i> = 0.005) and rates of first-pass isolation (OR 8.92, <i>P</i> = 0.001). Compared with the conventional group, freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one-year follow-up was higher in the HPSD group without the guidance of AI/LSI (OR 1.66, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and studies with a power setting of 40–50 W (OR 1.93, <i>P</i> = 0.002). Nevertheless, the two groups had similar effectiveness with a power setting of 50 W in the HPSD RFA (OR 1.10, <i>P</i> = 0.52). There was no difference in complications between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.71). <i>Conclusion</i>. HPSD RFA was associated with shorter procedure duration, higher freedom from atrial arrhythmia, and comparable safety compared to conventional RFA.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiology","volume":"2022 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9398879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2022/6013474","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety between high-power short-duration (HPSD) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and conventional RFA in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods. Studies comparing HPSD and traditional applications in patients undergoing initial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation from inception through December 2021 were searched on Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov. Results. The meta-analysis included seventeen studies with a total of 4934 patients. HPSD group decreased procedure duration (mean difference (MD) −38.28 min, P < 0.001), RF duration (MD −20.51 min, P < 0.001), fluoroscopy duration (MD −5.19 min, P < 0.001), and acute pulmonary vein reconnection (Odds ratio (OR) 0.40, P < 0.001), while improving the freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one year (OR 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–1.94, P = 0.005) and rates of first-pass isolation (OR 8.92, P = 0.001). Compared with the conventional group, freedom from atrial arrhythmia at one-year follow-up was higher in the HPSD group without the guidance of AI/LSI (OR 1.66, P = 0.01) and studies with a power setting of 40–50 W (OR 1.93, P = 0.002). Nevertheless, the two groups had similar effectiveness with a power setting of 50 W in the HPSD RFA (OR 1.10, P = 0.52). There was no difference in complications between the two groups (P = 0.71). Conclusion. HPSD RFA was associated with shorter procedure duration, higher freedom from atrial arrhythmia, and comparable safety compared to conventional RFA.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高功率短时间消融术与常规消融术治疗心房颤动的有效性和安全性比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:我们旨在评估高功率短时间(HPSD)射频消融(RFA)与常规射频消融(RFA)治疗心房颤动(AF)患者的有效性和安全性。方法:从一开始到2021年12月,在Pubmed、Medline、Cochrane和clinicaltrials . gov.v上检索比较HPSD和传统应用在房颤初始导管消融患者中的研究。结果:荟萃分析包括17项研究,共4934例患者。HPSD组缩短了手术时间(平均差值(MD) -38.28分钟,P < 0.001)、射频检查时间(MD -20.51分钟,P < 0.001)、透视时间(MD -5.19分钟,P < 0.001)和急性肺静脉重连(优势比(OR) 0.40, P < 0.001),同时改善了一年内房颤的自由度(OR 1.48, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.12-1.94, P=0.005)和首次分离率(OR 8.92, P=0.001)。与常规组相比,无AI/LSI指导的HPSD组(OR 1.66, P=0.01)和功率设置为40-50 W的研究组(OR 1.93, P=0.002)一年随访时房性心律失常发生率更高。然而,两组在HPSD RFA功率设置为50 W时具有相似的有效性(OR 1.10, P=0.52)。两组并发症发生率无差异(P=0.71)。结论:与传统RFA相比,HPSD RFA具有更短的手术时间、更高的房性心律失常发生率和相当的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of interventional cardiology
Journal of interventional cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Interventional Cardiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for cardiologists determined to stay current in the diagnosis, investigation, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease and its associated complications. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on new procedures and techniques in all major subject areas in the field, including: Acute coronary syndrome Coronary disease Congenital heart diseases Myocardial infarction Peripheral arterial disease Valvular heart disease Cardiac hemodynamics and physiology Haemostasis and thrombosis
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “The “L-Sandwich” Strategy for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial” Complete Revascularization Techniques for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Angiography- and Coronary Physiology-Guided PCI Predictors for Sedation Failure in Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Procedures Single Center Experience With Impella 5.5 for Escalation and De-Escalation of Cardiogenic Shock Patients Epidemiological Trends, Etiology, and Burden Study of Heart Failure in China, 1990–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1