Identifying Patients Vulnerable to Inadequate Pain Resolution After Cardiac Surgery

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.08.010
Ian Kelly BS , Kara Fields MS , Pankaj Sarin MD , Amanda Pang BS , Martin I. Sigurdsson MD, PhD , Stanton K. Shernan MD , Amanda A. Fox MD, MPH , Simon C. Body MBChB, MPH , Jochen D. Muehlschlegel MD, MMSc, MBA
{"title":"Identifying Patients Vulnerable to Inadequate Pain Resolution After Cardiac Surgery","authors":"Ian Kelly BS ,&nbsp;Kara Fields MS ,&nbsp;Pankaj Sarin MD ,&nbsp;Amanda Pang BS ,&nbsp;Martin I. Sigurdsson MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Stanton K. Shernan MD ,&nbsp;Amanda A. Fox MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Simon C. Body MBChB, MPH ,&nbsp;Jochen D. Muehlschlegel MD, MMSc, MBA","doi":"10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Acute postoperative pain<span> (APOP) is often evaluated through granular parameters, though monitoring postoperative pain using trends may better describe pain state. We investigated acute postoperative pain trajectories in cardiac surgical patients to identify subpopulations of pain resolution and elucidate predictors of problematic pain courses. We examined retrospective data from 2810 cardiac surgical patients at a single center. The k-means algorithm for longitudinal data was used to generate clusters of pain trajectories over the first 5 postoperative days. Patient characteristics were examined for association with cluster membership using ordinal and multinomial </span></span>logistic regression<span>. We identified 3 subgroups of pain resolution after cardiac surgery: 37.7% with good resolution, 44.2% with moderate resolution, and 18.2% exhibiting poor resolution. Type I diabetes (2.04 [1.00–4.16], </span></span><em>p</em> = 0.05), preoperative opioid use (1.65 [1.23–2.22], <em>p</em><span> = 0.001), and illicit drug use (1.89 [1.26–2.83], </span><em>p</em> = 0.002) elevated risk of membership into worse pain trajectory clusters. Female gender (1.72 [1.30–2.27], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), depression (1.60 [1.03–2.50], <em>p</em> = 0.04) and chronic pain (3.28 [1.79–5.99], <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) increased risk of membership in the worst pain resolution cluster. This study defined 3 APOP resolution subgroups based on pain score trend after cardiac surgery and identified factors that predisposed patients to worse resolution. Patients with moderate or poor pain trajectory consumed more opioids and received them for longer before discharge. Future studies are warranted to determine if altering postoperative pain monitoring and management improve postoperative course of patients at risk of moderate or poor pain resolution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48592,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S104306792200209X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute postoperative pain (APOP) is often evaluated through granular parameters, though monitoring postoperative pain using trends may better describe pain state. We investigated acute postoperative pain trajectories in cardiac surgical patients to identify subpopulations of pain resolution and elucidate predictors of problematic pain courses. We examined retrospective data from 2810 cardiac surgical patients at a single center. The k-means algorithm for longitudinal data was used to generate clusters of pain trajectories over the first 5 postoperative days. Patient characteristics were examined for association with cluster membership using ordinal and multinomial logistic regression. We identified 3 subgroups of pain resolution after cardiac surgery: 37.7% with good resolution, 44.2% with moderate resolution, and 18.2% exhibiting poor resolution. Type I diabetes (2.04 [1.00–4.16], p = 0.05), preoperative opioid use (1.65 [1.23–2.22], p = 0.001), and illicit drug use (1.89 [1.26–2.83], p = 0.002) elevated risk of membership into worse pain trajectory clusters. Female gender (1.72 [1.30–2.27], p < 0.001), depression (1.60 [1.03–2.50], p = 0.04) and chronic pain (3.28 [1.79–5.99], p < 0.001) increased risk of membership in the worst pain resolution cluster. This study defined 3 APOP resolution subgroups based on pain score trend after cardiac surgery and identified factors that predisposed patients to worse resolution. Patients with moderate or poor pain trajectory consumed more opioids and received them for longer before discharge. Future studies are warranted to determine if altering postoperative pain monitoring and management improve postoperative course of patients at risk of moderate or poor pain resolution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别心脏手术后容易出现疼痛缓解不充分的患者。
急性术后疼痛(APOP)通常通过颗粒参数进行评估,但利用趋势监测术后疼痛可能会更好地描述疼痛状态。我们研究了心脏外科患者术后急性疼痛的轨迹,以确定疼痛缓解的亚群,并阐明有问题的疼痛过程的预测因素。我们研究了一个中心 2810 名心脏手术患者的回顾性数据。采用纵向数据 k-means 算法生成术后前 5 天的疼痛轨迹群组。使用序数和多项式逻辑回归检验了患者特征与群组成员的关系。我们确定了心脏手术后疼痛缓解的 3 个亚组:37.7%的患者疼痛缓解情况良好,44.2%的患者疼痛缓解情况中等,18.2%的患者疼痛缓解情况较差。I型糖尿病(2.04 [1.00-4.16],p = 0.05)、术前阿片类药物使用(1.65 [1.23-2.22],p = 0.001)和非法药物使用(1.89 [1.26-2.83],p = 0.002)增加了加入较差疼痛轨迹群组的风险。女性(1.72 [1.30-2.27],p < 0.001)、抑郁(1.60 [1.03-2.50],p = 0.04)和慢性疼痛(3.28 [1.79-5.99],p < 0.001)增加了加入最差疼痛解决群组的风险。本研究根据心脏手术后疼痛评分趋势定义了 3 个 APOP 疼痛缓解亚组,并确定了导致患者疼痛缓解更差的易感因素。中度或较差疼痛轨迹的患者在出院前消耗了更多的阿片类药物,接受治疗的时间也更长。今后有必要开展研究,以确定改变术后疼痛监测和管理是否能改善有中度或严重疼痛缓解风险的患者的术后情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
12 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is devoted to providing a forum for cardiothoracic surgeons to disseminate and discuss important new information and to gain insight into unresolved areas of question in the specialty. Each issue presents readers with a selection of original peer-reviewed articles accompanied by editorial commentary from specialists in the field. In addition, readers are offered valuable invited articles: State of Views editorials and Current Readings highlighting the latest contributions on central or controversial issues. Another prized feature is expert roundtable discussions in which experts debate critical questions for cardiothoracic treatment and care. Seminars is an invitation-only publication that receives original submissions transferred ONLY from its sister publication, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. As we continue to expand the reach of the Journal, we will explore the possibility of accepting unsolicited manuscripts in the future.
期刊最新文献
Expert Opinion: What should revascularization trials that inform the guidelines look like? Midterm Outcomes in Type A Aortic Dissection Repair With and Without Malperfusion in a Hybrid Operating Room Characterization of Favorable Right Ventricular Dimensions for Optimal Reverse Remodeling Following Pulmonary Valve Replacement Prognostic Predictors of Tricuspid Regurgitation Worsening after Mitral Regurgitation Surgery with Mild Tricuspid Regurgitation Twenty-Five Years of Lung Transplantation in Medellín: Overcoming the Challenges of an Emerging Country
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1