Outcome of endodontic treatments performed by Brazilian undergraduate students: 3- to 8-year follow up.

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics Pub Date : 2022-08-18 eCollection Date: 2022-08-01 DOI:10.5395/rde.2022.47.e34
Jéssica Gabriele da Rocha, Isabella Marian Lena, Jéssica Lopes Trindade, Gabriela Salatino Liedke, Renata Dornelles Morgental, Carlos Alexandre Souza Bier
{"title":"Outcome of endodontic treatments performed by Brazilian undergraduate students: 3- to 8-year follow up.","authors":"Jéssica Gabriele da Rocha,&nbsp;Isabella Marian Lena,&nbsp;Jéssica Lopes Trindade,&nbsp;Gabriela Salatino Liedke,&nbsp;Renata Dornelles Morgental,&nbsp;Carlos Alexandre Souza Bier","doi":"10.5395/rde.2022.47.e34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the success rate of endodontic treatments performed by undergraduate students and the factors associated with the outcome.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A follow-up of 3 to 8 years after root canal filling was carried out in 91 patients. At the follow-up visits, medical and dental history questionnaires were applied along with clinical and radiographic examinations. Data collected in the clinical exam included: the presence of pain, swelling, sinus tract, mobility, tenderness to palpation and percussion, periodontal probing profile, and type/quality of coronal restoration. Postoperative and follow-up radiographs were digitalized and analyzed by 2 trained and calibrated examiners to assess periapical healing. The treatment outcome was based on strict clinical and radiographic criteria and classified as success (absence of any clinical and radiographic sign of apical periodontitis) or failure (other combination). Logistic regression was used to investigate the impact of clinical and radiographic variables on endodontic treatment outcomes at a 5% significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of endodontic treatments was 60.7%. The only risk factor significantly associated with failure was the presence of a periapical lesion on the postoperative radiograph (odds ratio, 3.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-9.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The success rate of endodontic treatments performed by undergraduate students was low and was jeopardized by the presence of a periapical lesion on the postoperative radiograph.</p>","PeriodicalId":21102,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/39/ae/rde-47-e34.PMC9436650.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the success rate of endodontic treatments performed by undergraduate students and the factors associated with the outcome.

Materials and methods: A follow-up of 3 to 8 years after root canal filling was carried out in 91 patients. At the follow-up visits, medical and dental history questionnaires were applied along with clinical and radiographic examinations. Data collected in the clinical exam included: the presence of pain, swelling, sinus tract, mobility, tenderness to palpation and percussion, periodontal probing profile, and type/quality of coronal restoration. Postoperative and follow-up radiographs were digitalized and analyzed by 2 trained and calibrated examiners to assess periapical healing. The treatment outcome was based on strict clinical and radiographic criteria and classified as success (absence of any clinical and radiographic sign of apical periodontitis) or failure (other combination). Logistic regression was used to investigate the impact of clinical and radiographic variables on endodontic treatment outcomes at a 5% significance level.

Results: The success rate of endodontic treatments was 60.7%. The only risk factor significantly associated with failure was the presence of a periapical lesion on the postoperative radiograph (odds ratio, 3.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-9.54).

Conclusions: The success rate of endodontic treatments performed by undergraduate students was low and was jeopardized by the presence of a periapical lesion on the postoperative radiograph.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西大学生进行牙髓治疗的结果:3至8年随访。
目的:本研究旨在评估大学生根管治疗的成功率及其影响因素。材料与方法:对91例患者进行根管充填后3 ~ 8年的随访。在随访时,使用医疗和牙科病史调查表以及临床和放射检查。临床检查收集的数据包括:疼痛、肿胀、窦道、活动度、触诊和叩诊压痛、牙周探查轮廓和冠状修复的类型/质量。术后和随访的x线片由2名经过培训和校准的检查人员进行数字化和分析,以评估根尖周愈合。治疗结果基于严格的临床和放射学标准,并分为成功(没有任何临床和放射学迹象的根尖牙周炎)或失败(其他组合)。采用Logistic回归研究临床和影像学变量对根管治疗结果的影响,显著性水平为5%。结果:根管治疗成功率为60.7%。唯一与失败显著相关的危险因素是术后x线片上出现根尖周围病变(优势比3.35;95%置信区间,1.17-9.54)。结论:大学生根管治疗成功率低,术后x线片上出现根尖周病变会影响治疗成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A 48-month clinical performance of hybrid ceramic fragment restorations manufactured in CAD/CAM in non-carious cervical lesions: case report. Assessment of mechanical allodynia in healthy teeth adjacent and contralateral to endodontically diseased teeth: a clinical study. A global overview of enamel microabrasion for white spot lesions: a bibliometric review. Effect of surface sealant on the color stability and whiteness index of single-shade resin composites after staining and bleaching. Endodontic characteristics of mandibular premolar with dens evaginatus: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1