Exploring interindividual differences in fasting and postprandial insulin sensitivity adaptations in response to sprint interval exercise training.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-05 DOI:10.1080/17461391.2022.2124385
Richard S Metcalfe, Brendon J Gurd, Niels B J Vollaard
{"title":"Exploring interindividual differences in fasting and postprandial insulin sensitivity adaptations in response to sprint interval exercise training.","authors":"Richard S Metcalfe,&nbsp;Brendon J Gurd,&nbsp;Niels B J Vollaard","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2022.2124385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have concluded that wide variance in changes in insulin sensitivity markers following exercise training demonstrates heterogeneity in individual trainability. However, these studies frequently don't account for technical, biological, and random within-subject measurement error. We used the standard deviation of individual responses (SD<sub>IR</sub>) to determine whether interindividual variability in trainability exists for fasting and postprandial insulin sensitivity outcomes following low-volume sprint interval training (SIT). We pooled data from 63 untrained participants who completed 6 weeks of SIT (<i>n </i>= 49; VO<sub>2</sub>max: 35 (7) mL⋅kg<sup>-1</sup>⋅min<sup>-1</sup>) or acted as no-intervention controls (<i>n </i>= 14; VO<sub>2</sub>max: 34 (6) mL⋅kg<sup>-1</sup>⋅min<sup>-1</sup>). Fasting and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived measures of insulin sensitivity were measured pre- and post-intervention. SD<sub>IR</sub> values were positive and exceeded a small effect size threshold for changes in fasting glucose (SD<sub>IR </sub>= 0.27 [95%CI 0.07,0.38] mmol⋅L<sup>-1</sup>), 2-h OGTT glucose (SD<sub>IR </sub>= 0.89 [0.22,1.23] mmol⋅L<sup>-1</sup>), glucose area-under-the-curve (SD<sub>IR </sub>= 66.4 [-81.5,124.3] mmol⋅L<sup>-1</sup>⋅120min<sup>-1</sup>) and The Cederholm Index (SD<sub>IR </sub>= 7.2 [-16.0,19.0] mg⋅l<sup>2</sup>⋅mmol<sup>-1</sup>⋅mU<sup>-1</sup>⋅min<sup>-1</sup>), suggesting meaningful individual responses to SIT, whilst SD<sub>IR</sub> values were negative for fasting insulin, fasting insulin resistance and insulin AUC. For all variables, the 95% CIs were wide and/or crossed zero, highlighting uncertainty about the existence of true interindividual differences in exercise trainability. Only 2-22% of participants could be classified as responders or non-responders with more than 95% certainty. Our findings demonstrate it cannot be assumed that variation in changes in insulin sensitivity following SIT is attributable to inherent differences in trainability, and reiterate the importance of accounting for technical, biological, and random error when examining heterogeneity in health-related training adaptations.<b>Highlights</b> This study tested whether true interindividual variability exists for changes in insulin sensitivity and glyceamic control following 6-weeks of low volume sprint interval training (SIT).The high level of technical, biological, and random error associated with repeated measurements of insulin sensitivity and glycaemic control, means we can neither confidently conclude that there is evidence of true interindividual differences in the trainability of these outcomes following SIT, nor confidently identify responders or non-responders for such parameters.Researchers contrasting responders vs. non-responders for a given parameter, either to understand mechanisms of adaptation and/or develop physiological/genetic/epigenetic predictors of response, need to be aware that identification of responders and non-responders with sufficient certainty may not be achievable for parameters with a high level of technical, biological, and random error.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2022.2124385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Previous studies have concluded that wide variance in changes in insulin sensitivity markers following exercise training demonstrates heterogeneity in individual trainability. However, these studies frequently don't account for technical, biological, and random within-subject measurement error. We used the standard deviation of individual responses (SDIR) to determine whether interindividual variability in trainability exists for fasting and postprandial insulin sensitivity outcomes following low-volume sprint interval training (SIT). We pooled data from 63 untrained participants who completed 6 weeks of SIT (n = 49; VO2max: 35 (7) mL⋅kg-1⋅min-1) or acted as no-intervention controls (n = 14; VO2max: 34 (6) mL⋅kg-1⋅min-1). Fasting and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-derived measures of insulin sensitivity were measured pre- and post-intervention. SDIR values were positive and exceeded a small effect size threshold for changes in fasting glucose (SDIR = 0.27 [95%CI 0.07,0.38] mmol⋅L-1), 2-h OGTT glucose (SDIR = 0.89 [0.22,1.23] mmol⋅L-1), glucose area-under-the-curve (SDIR = 66.4 [-81.5,124.3] mmol⋅L-1⋅120min-1) and The Cederholm Index (SDIR = 7.2 [-16.0,19.0] mg⋅l2⋅mmol-1⋅mU-1⋅min-1), suggesting meaningful individual responses to SIT, whilst SDIR values were negative for fasting insulin, fasting insulin resistance and insulin AUC. For all variables, the 95% CIs were wide and/or crossed zero, highlighting uncertainty about the existence of true interindividual differences in exercise trainability. Only 2-22% of participants could be classified as responders or non-responders with more than 95% certainty. Our findings demonstrate it cannot be assumed that variation in changes in insulin sensitivity following SIT is attributable to inherent differences in trainability, and reiterate the importance of accounting for technical, biological, and random error when examining heterogeneity in health-related training adaptations.Highlights This study tested whether true interindividual variability exists for changes in insulin sensitivity and glyceamic control following 6-weeks of low volume sprint interval training (SIT).The high level of technical, biological, and random error associated with repeated measurements of insulin sensitivity and glycaemic control, means we can neither confidently conclude that there is evidence of true interindividual differences in the trainability of these outcomes following SIT, nor confidently identify responders or non-responders for such parameters.Researchers contrasting responders vs. non-responders for a given parameter, either to understand mechanisms of adaptation and/or develop physiological/genetic/epigenetic predictors of response, need to be aware that identification of responders and non-responders with sufficient certainty may not be achievable for parameters with a high level of technical, biological, and random error.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨禁食和餐后胰岛素敏感性适应对短跑间歇运动训练的个体差异。
先前的研究得出结论,运动训练后胰岛素敏感性标志物变化的巨大差异表明个体训练能力的异质性。然而,这些研究往往没有考虑到技术、生物学和随机的受试者内部测量误差。我们使用个体反应的标准差(SDIR)来确定低容量短跑间歇训练(SIT)后禁食和餐后胰岛素敏感性结果的可训练性是否存在个体间变异。我们汇集了63名未经训练的参与者的数据,他们完成了6周的SIT(n = 49;VO2max:35(7)mL·kg-1·min-1)或作为无干预对照(n = 14;VO2max:34(6)mL·kg-1·min-1)。干预前后测量禁食和口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)衍生的胰岛素敏感性指标。SDIR值为阳性,超过了空腹血糖变化的小效应阈值(SDIR = 0.27[95%CI 0.07,0.38]mmol·L-1),2-小时OGTT葡萄糖(SDIR = 0.89[0.22,1.23]mmol·L-1),曲线下葡萄糖面积(SDIR = 66.4[-81.5124.3]mmol·L-1·120min-1)和Cederholm指数(SDIR = 7.2[-16.0,19.0]mg·l2·mmol-1·mU-1·min-1),表明个体对SIT有意义的反应,而SDIR值对空腹胰岛素、空腹胰岛素抵抗和胰岛素AUC呈阴性。对于所有变量,95%的CI都很宽和/或过零,这突出了运动可训练性是否存在真正的个体间差异的不确定性。只有2-22%的参与者可以被归类为有应答者或无应答者,其确定性超过95%。我们的研究结果表明,不能假设SIT后胰岛素敏感性变化的变化归因于可训练性的固有差异,并重申在检查健康相关训练适应的异质性时,考虑技术、生物学和随机误差的重要性。亮点这项研究测试了在6周的低容量短跑间歇训练(SIT)后,胰岛素敏感性和血糖控制的变化是否存在真正的个体间变异性。与胰岛素敏感性和低血糖控制的重复测量相关的高水平的技术、生物和随机误差,意味着我们既不能自信地得出SIT后这些结果的可训练性存在真正的个体间差异的结论,也不能自信地确定这些参数的应答者或非应答者。研究人员对给定参数的应答者与非应答者进行对比,以了解适应机制和/或开发应答的生理/遗传/表观遗传学预测因子,需要意识到,对于技术、生物学和随机误差较高的参数,可能无法实现对应答者和非应答者的充分确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1