[Scores obtained by physicians in the national health services admission contest between 2016 and 2020].

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista medica de Chile Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.4067/S0034-98872022000400473
Gonzalo Alberto Peralta-Jiménez, Esteban Iván Moraga-Escobar, Carolina Alexandra Adelina Chambi-Martínez, Rodrigo Enrique Torres-Quevedo
{"title":"[Scores obtained by physicians in the national health services admission contest between 2016 and 2020].","authors":"Gonzalo Alberto Peralta-Jiménez,&nbsp;Esteban Iván Moraga-Escobar,&nbsp;Carolina Alexandra Adelina Chambi-Martínez,&nbsp;Rodrigo Enrique Torres-Quevedo","doi":"10.4067/S0034-98872022000400473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical specialists are an essential resource for the functioning of the health system and in Chile there is a growing deficit of these specialists. To address this shortage, the government has strategies for training health professionals, such as a national public contest for medical scholarships, named CONISS, which stands out for its high capacity to produce medical specialists. The scoring system of this contest is used for the allocation of training resources to the best candidates.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe the results of the CONISS scoring system between 2016 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Analysis of public registries of physicians participating in the CONISS contest between 2016 and 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period 7,373 physicians participated in this contest (49% females). Annual participation increased progressively. The participants graduated from 21 Chilean universities and a variable number from foreign universities. The scores obtained by participants improved by 1.47 points between the first and last year of the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interpretation of these results is complicated by the characteristics and limitations of the measurements of the CONISS scoring system. This precludes establishing whether this system effectively filters out the best candidates for medical specialization programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21360,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872022000400473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical specialists are an essential resource for the functioning of the health system and in Chile there is a growing deficit of these specialists. To address this shortage, the government has strategies for training health professionals, such as a national public contest for medical scholarships, named CONISS, which stands out for its high capacity to produce medical specialists. The scoring system of this contest is used for the allocation of training resources to the best candidates.

Aim: To describe the results of the CONISS scoring system between 2016 and 2020.

Material and methods: Analysis of public registries of physicians participating in the CONISS contest between 2016 and 2020.

Results: During the study period 7,373 physicians participated in this contest (49% females). Annual participation increased progressively. The participants graduated from 21 Chilean universities and a variable number from foreign universities. The scores obtained by participants improved by 1.47 points between the first and last year of the study period.

Conclusions: Interpretation of these results is complicated by the characteristics and limitations of the measurements of the CONISS scoring system. This precludes establishing whether this system effectively filters out the best candidates for medical specialization programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[2016 - 2020年全国卫生服务准入竞赛医师得分]。
背景:医学专家是卫生系统运作的重要资源,在智利,这些专家的缺口越来越大。为了解决这一短缺问题,政府制定了培训卫生专业人员的战略,例如全国公开的医疗奖学金竞赛,名为CONISS,该竞赛因其培养医学专家的高能力而引人注目。本次比赛的计分系统用于将培训资源分配给最佳候选人。目的:描述2016 - 2020年CONISS评分系统的结果。材料和方法:对2016年至2020年参加CONISS竞赛的医生的公共登记进行分析。结果:在研究期间,7373名医生参加了本次比赛(49%为女性)。年度参与人数逐步增加。参加者毕业于21所智利大学,还有不同数量的人毕业于外国大学。在研究期间的第一年和最后一年,参与者的得分提高了1.47分。结论:CONISS评分系统测量的特点和局限性使这些结果的解释变得复杂。这就排除了建立这个系统是否有效地过滤出医学专业项目的最佳候选人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista medica de Chile
Revista medica de Chile 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Médica de Chile publica trabajos originales sobre temas de interés médico y de Ciencias Biomédicas, dando preferencia a los relacionados con la Medicina Interna y sus especialidades derivadas. Publicada mensualmente, desde 1872, por la Sociedad Médica de Santiago. La abreviatura de su título es Rev Med Chile, que debe ser usado en bibliografías, notas al pié de página, leyendas y referencias bibliográficas.
期刊最新文献
[Being Depressed or Having Depression. The biomedical model and the difference between mood and illness]. Chronic angina secondary to Takayasu arteritis. Report of one case. [Single-pass albumin dialysis as treatment of acute on chronic liver failure during COVID-19 pneumonia. report of one case]. [The perception of teachers and students about clinical reasoning in health care careers]. [Knowing better, knowing the why, and knowing how to do: assumptions of depression in psychiatry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1