The efficacy of itraconazole, fluticasone and doxycycline in chronic rhinosinusitis.

International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology Pub Date : 2022-08-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Seyyed Mostafa Hashemi, Seyed Mojtaba Abtahi Forooshani, Ali Borhani
{"title":"The efficacy of itraconazole, fluticasone and doxycycline in chronic rhinosinusitis.","authors":"Seyyed Mostafa Hashemi,&nbsp;Seyed Mojtaba Abtahi Forooshani,&nbsp;Ali Borhani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Different treatment strategies for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have been evaluated. Here we aimed to investigate the effects of fluticasone spray alone and in combination with itraconazole or doxycycline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an open-label clinical trial performed in 2020-2021 in Isfahan on patients with CRS. This survey's Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) code was IRCT20200825048515N50 (https://en.irct.ir/trial/60826). Demographic data of all patients including age and gender and duration of CRS, were obtained. The SNOT-22 and Lund-Kennedy questionnaires were evaluated and recorded for the symptomatology of CRS. Patients were randomly assigned to the treatment groups to receive 100 mg of doxycycline with intranasal fluticasone spray, intranasal fluticasone spray alone, or itraconazole 100 mg capsules with intranasal fluticasone spray. After one month of treatment, the scores and patient satisfaction were evaluated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 104 patients was analyzed. Patients had improvements in their symptoms and SNOTT-22 scores. The mean SNOTT-22 score was 55.36±8.36 in all patients. During the study, patients had improvements in their symptoms and SNOTT-22 scores. The mean final SNOTT-22 score was 47.77±7.36 at the end of the survey (P=0.02). Our data also demonstrated significant improvements in the Lund-Kennedy score in all patients during the study (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There were no significant differences between the clinical condition of patients receiving intranasal fluticasone, intranasal fluticasone in combination with doxycycline or itraconazole.</p>","PeriodicalId":14352,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","volume":"14 4","pages":"240-246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9490205/pdf/ijppp0014-0240.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Different treatment strategies for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) have been evaluated. Here we aimed to investigate the effects of fluticasone spray alone and in combination with itraconazole or doxycycline.

Methods: This is an open-label clinical trial performed in 2020-2021 in Isfahan on patients with CRS. This survey's Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) code was IRCT20200825048515N50 (https://en.irct.ir/trial/60826). Demographic data of all patients including age and gender and duration of CRS, were obtained. The SNOT-22 and Lund-Kennedy questionnaires were evaluated and recorded for the symptomatology of CRS. Patients were randomly assigned to the treatment groups to receive 100 mg of doxycycline with intranasal fluticasone spray, intranasal fluticasone spray alone, or itraconazole 100 mg capsules with intranasal fluticasone spray. After one month of treatment, the scores and patient satisfaction were evaluated and compared.

Results: Data of 104 patients was analyzed. Patients had improvements in their symptoms and SNOTT-22 scores. The mean SNOTT-22 score was 55.36±8.36 in all patients. During the study, patients had improvements in their symptoms and SNOTT-22 scores. The mean final SNOTT-22 score was 47.77±7.36 at the end of the survey (P=0.02). Our data also demonstrated significant improvements in the Lund-Kennedy score in all patients during the study (P<0.05).

Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the clinical condition of patients receiving intranasal fluticasone, intranasal fluticasone in combination with doxycycline or itraconazole.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊曲康唑、氟替卡松和强力霉素治疗慢性鼻窦炎的疗效观察。
背景:对慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)的不同治疗策略进行了评估。本研究旨在探讨氟替卡松喷雾剂单独使用和与伊曲康唑或强力霉素联合使用的效果。方法:这是2020-2021年在伊斯法罕对CRS患者进行的一项开放标签临床试验。本次调查的伊朗临床试验登记处(IRCT)代码为IRCT20200825048515N50 (https://en.irct.ir/trial/60826)。所有患者的人口统计数据包括年龄、性别和CRS持续时间。评估并记录SNOT-22和Lund-Kennedy问卷对CRS症状的影响。患者被随机分配到治疗组,分别接受100 mg强力霉素联合氟替卡松鼻内喷雾剂、单独使用氟替卡松鼻内喷雾剂和100 mg伊曲康唑胶囊联合氟替卡松鼻内喷雾剂。治疗1个月后,对评分和患者满意度进行评估和比较。结果:对104例患者资料进行分析。患者的症状和SNOTT-22评分均有改善。所有患者的SNOTT-22平均评分为55.36±8.36。在研究期间,患者的症状和SNOTT-22评分均有改善。调查结束时SNOTT-22平均评分为47.77±7.36 (P=0.02)。我们的数据还显示,在研究期间,所有患者的隆德-肯尼迪评分均有显著改善(p结论:鼻用氟替卡松、鼻用氟替卡松联合强力霉素或伊曲康唑的患者的临床状况无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute paracetamol toxicity-induced inflammatory and oxidative effects are relieved by Aleppo galls: a novel experimental study. Evaluation of PD-L1 antigen expression using immunohistochemistry technique in medullary thyroid carcinoma samples. Effectiveness of yoga on Ewing's battery autonomic function test: cross-sectional study. NAD+ administration profoundly decreases UVC-induced skin damage by attenuating oxidative stress, inflammation, DNA damage and apoptosis. Effect of Shenqi millet porridge on gastrointestinal function decline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1