One Size Does Not Fit All; Patient Preference for Breast Reconstruction.

Eplasty Pub Date : 2022-09-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Shreya Raman, Lauren E Powell, Emily S Andersen, Lauren C Nigro
{"title":"One Size Does Not Fit All; Patient Preference for Breast Reconstruction.","authors":"Shreya Raman,&nbsp;Lauren E Powell,&nbsp;Emily S Andersen,&nbsp;Lauren C Nigro","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A myriad of patient education modalities for breast reconstruction exist, although the optimal tools for patient education remain undetermined. The aim of this study is to determine patient preferences for breast reconstruction education modalities based on demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study at a tertiary care university health system was conducted between November 2020 and May 2021. A questionnaire was administered to breast reconstruction patients to collect information on demographics, research sources used before the initial appointment, and preferred education modalities. Differences based on age were analyzed using an independent samples <i>t</i> test, whereas a Fisher exact test was used to analyze differences based on ethnicity and education level. Statistical significance was defined as <i>P</i> < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most preferred patient education tools overall were books/written materials and videos. Younger patients were significantly more likely than older patients to have referenced additional physician sources (<i>P</i> = .0174) and to seek out information on the institution's website (<i>P</i> = .0465). Those with a college degree were significantly more likely to have performed research prior to the initial appointment (<i>P</i> = .0206). White patients were significantly more likely than nonwhite patients to talk to friends/family as a research source (<i>P</i> = .0150).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regardless of age, education, or ethnicity, most patients prefer books/written materials and video presentations for education on breast reconstruction. Providers should strive to include written and video options to meet the needs of this diverse patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11687,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":" ","pages":"e44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9516762/pdf/eplasty-22-e44.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A myriad of patient education modalities for breast reconstruction exist, although the optimal tools for patient education remain undetermined. The aim of this study is to determine patient preferences for breast reconstruction education modalities based on demographic variables.

Methods: A prospective observational study at a tertiary care university health system was conducted between November 2020 and May 2021. A questionnaire was administered to breast reconstruction patients to collect information on demographics, research sources used before the initial appointment, and preferred education modalities. Differences based on age were analyzed using an independent samples t test, whereas a Fisher exact test was used to analyze differences based on ethnicity and education level. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05.

Results: The most preferred patient education tools overall were books/written materials and videos. Younger patients were significantly more likely than older patients to have referenced additional physician sources (P = .0174) and to seek out information on the institution's website (P = .0465). Those with a college degree were significantly more likely to have performed research prior to the initial appointment (P = .0206). White patients were significantly more likely than nonwhite patients to talk to friends/family as a research source (P = .0150).

Conclusions: Regardless of age, education, or ethnicity, most patients prefer books/written materials and video presentations for education on breast reconstruction. Providers should strive to include written and video options to meet the needs of this diverse patient population.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种尺码不适合所有人;患者对乳房再造的偏好。
背景:存在无数的乳房重建患者教育模式,尽管患者教育的最佳工具仍未确定。本研究的目的是根据人口统计学变量确定患者对乳房重建教育方式的偏好。方法:在2020年11月至2021年5月期间在三级保健大学卫生系统进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。对乳房重建患者进行问卷调查,以收集人口统计学信息、初次预约前使用的研究来源和首选的教育方式。基于年龄的差异使用独立样本t检验进行分析,而基于种族和教育水平的差异使用Fisher精确检验进行分析。统计学意义定义为P < 0.05。结果:总体而言,最受欢迎的患者教育工具是书籍/书面材料和视频。与老年患者相比,年轻患者更有可能参考其他医生资料(P = 0.0174),并在机构网站上查找信息(P = 0.0465)。那些拥有大学学位的人更有可能在最初的任命之前进行研究(P = 0.0206)。白人患者比非白人患者更有可能将朋友/家人作为研究来源(P = .0150)。结论:无论年龄、教育程度或种族,大多数患者更喜欢书籍/书面材料和视频演示进行乳房再造教育。提供者应努力包括书面和视频选项,以满足这一不同的患者群体的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Size Really Matter? A Review on How to Determine the Optimal Umbilical Size During an Abdominoplasty. The 5 D's to Dunk the Dog: A Retrospective Clinical Review to Prevent Dog-Ear Contour Abnormalities in Vertical Breast Reductions and Breast Lifts. Beneficial Impact of "Supercharged" Pectoralis Major Musculocutaneous Flap With Indocyanine Green Angiography on Reconstruction in a Patient at High Risk for Necrosis. The Safety of Long Inframammary Fold to Nipple Lengths in Inferior Pedicle Breast Reductions: A Decade of Experience. Are Large Intraoperative Fill Volumes Associated With Increased Complications After Tissue Expander Placement?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1