Definition and Classification of Postoperative Complications After Cardiac Surgery: Pilot Delphi Study.

Linda Lapp, Matt-Mouley Bouamrane, Marc Roper, Kimberley Kavanagh, Stefan Schraag
{"title":"Definition and Classification of Postoperative Complications After Cardiac Surgery: Pilot Delphi Study.","authors":"Linda Lapp,&nbsp;Matt-Mouley Bouamrane,&nbsp;Marc Roper,&nbsp;Kimberley Kavanagh,&nbsp;Stefan Schraag","doi":"10.2196/39907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative complications following cardiac surgery are common and represent a serious burden to health services and society. However, there is a lack of consensus among experts on what events should be considered as a \"complication\" and how to assess their severity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to consult domain experts to pilot the development of a definition and classification system for complications following cardiac surgery with the goal to allow the progression of standardized clinical processes and systems in cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a Delphi study, which is a well-established method to reach expert consensus on complex topics. We sent 2 rounds of surveys to domain experts, including cardiac surgeons and anesthetists, to define and classify postoperative complications following cardiac surgery. The responses to open-ended questions were analyzed using a thematic analysis framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 71 and 37 experts' opinions were included in the analysis in Round 1 and Round 2 of the study, respectively. Cardiac anesthetists and cardiac critical care specialists took part in the study. Cardiac surgeons did not participate. Experts agreed that a classification for postoperative complications for cardiac surgery is useful, and consensus was reached for the generic definition of a postoperative complication in cardiac surgery. Consensus was also reached on classification of complications according to the following 4 levels: \"Mild,\" \"Moderate,\" \"Severe,\" and \"Death.\" Consensus was also reached on definitions for \"Mild\" and \"Severe\" categories of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Domain experts agreed on the definition and classification of complications in cardiac surgery for \"Mild\" and \"Severe\" complications. The standardization of complication identification, recording, and reporting in cardiac surgery should help the development of quality benchmarks, clinical audit, care quality assessment, resource planning, risk management, communication, and research.</p>","PeriodicalId":73557,"journal":{"name":"JMIR perioperative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e39907"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9607909/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR perioperative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/39907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Postoperative complications following cardiac surgery are common and represent a serious burden to health services and society. However, there is a lack of consensus among experts on what events should be considered as a "complication" and how to assess their severity.

Objective: This study aimed to consult domain experts to pilot the development of a definition and classification system for complications following cardiac surgery with the goal to allow the progression of standardized clinical processes and systems in cardiac surgery.

Methods: We conducted a Delphi study, which is a well-established method to reach expert consensus on complex topics. We sent 2 rounds of surveys to domain experts, including cardiac surgeons and anesthetists, to define and classify postoperative complications following cardiac surgery. The responses to open-ended questions were analyzed using a thematic analysis framework.

Results: In total, 71 and 37 experts' opinions were included in the analysis in Round 1 and Round 2 of the study, respectively. Cardiac anesthetists and cardiac critical care specialists took part in the study. Cardiac surgeons did not participate. Experts agreed that a classification for postoperative complications for cardiac surgery is useful, and consensus was reached for the generic definition of a postoperative complication in cardiac surgery. Consensus was also reached on classification of complications according to the following 4 levels: "Mild," "Moderate," "Severe," and "Death." Consensus was also reached on definitions for "Mild" and "Severe" categories of complications.

Conclusions: Domain experts agreed on the definition and classification of complications in cardiac surgery for "Mild" and "Severe" complications. The standardization of complication identification, recording, and reporting in cardiac surgery should help the development of quality benchmarks, clinical audit, care quality assessment, resource planning, risk management, communication, and research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心脏手术后并发症的定义和分类:试点德尔菲研究。
背景:心脏手术后并发症是常见的,是卫生服务和社会的严重负担。然而,对于哪些事件应被视为“并发症”以及如何评估其严重性,专家之间缺乏共识。目的:本研究旨在咨询领域专家,以试点心脏手术后并发症的定义和分类系统的发展,目标是允许心脏手术标准化临床过程和系统的进展。方法:我们进行了德尔菲研究,这是一个行之有效的方法,以达成专家共识的复杂问题。我们向包括心脏外科医生和麻醉师在内的领域专家发送了两轮调查,以定义和分类心脏手术后的并发症。使用主题分析框架对开放式问题的回答进行分析。结果:在研究的第一轮和第二轮中,共有71条和37条专家意见被纳入分析。心脏麻醉师和心脏重症监护专家参与了这项研究。心脏外科医生没有参与。专家们一致认为,心脏手术术后并发症的分类是有用的,并就心脏手术术后并发症的通用定义达成了共识。按照“轻度”、“中度”、“重度”和“死亡”4个级别对并发症进行分类也达成了共识。对“轻度”和“重度”并发症的定义也达成了共识。结论:领域专家对心脏手术并发症的“轻度”和“重度”的定义和分类达成一致。心脏外科并发症识别、记录和报告的标准化应有助于制定质量基准、临床审计、护理质量评估、资源规划、风险管理、沟通和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of Brief Submaximal Cardiopulmonary Testing in a High-Volume Presurgical Evaluation Clinic: Feasibility Cohort Study. Correction: A Patient-Oriented Implementation Strategy for a Perioperative mHealth Intervention: Feasibility Cohort Study. Enhancing Quadruple Health Outcomes After Thoracic Surgery: Feasibility Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Using Digital Home Monitoring. Agreement Between Provider-Completed and Patient-Completed Preoperative Frailty Screening Using the Clinical Risk Analysis Index: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. A Patient-Oriented Implementation Strategy for a Perioperative mHealth Intervention: Feasibility Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1