Optical coherence tomography systems for evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic reconstructions.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2022-09-29 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/26415275.2022.2122468
Hiba Al-Imam, Ana R Benetti, Pete Tomlins, Klaus Gotfredsen
{"title":"Optical coherence tomography systems for evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic reconstructions.","authors":"Hiba Al-Imam, Ana R Benetti, Pete Tomlins, Klaus Gotfredsen","doi":"10.1080/26415275.2022.2122468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate and zirconia crowns using two optical coherence tomography (OCT) systems in order to estimate inter-system variations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Ten lithium disilicate and 10 cubic stabilized zirconia crowns were placed on prepared artificial teeth without cement. Marginal discrepancy and internal cement gap of the crowns were assessed on images obtained using a swept source OCT (SS-OCT) and a spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT). Medians and interquartile ranges were calculated for both materials and OCT systems. Thereafter, Wilcoxon signed rank test was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was found between the two OCT systems for absolute marginal discrepancy of either lithium disilicate (SS-OCT: 182 µm, SD-OCT: 214 µm; <i>p</i> = .922) or zirconia crowns (SS-OCT: 116 µm, SD-OCT: 121 µm; <i>p</i> = .232). Regarding internal cement gap, no significant difference was found between the two OCT systems for lithium disilicate crowns (SS-OCT: 128 µm, SD-OCT: 128 µm; <i>p</i> = .064). However, for zirconia crowns the SD-OCT showed significantly higher (<i>p</i> = .027) internal cement gap (92 µm) than the SS-OCT (68 µm). Moreover, it was not possible to assess the internal fit of zirconia crowns in 47% and 34% of the sites using SD-OCT and SS-OCT, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant difference was noted in the ability of SS-OCT and SD-OCT to assess the marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate crowns, nor the marginal fit of zirconia crowns. On the contrary, drawbacks regarding the assessment of internal fit of zirconia crowns using both OCT systems were observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"84-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2122468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate and zirconia crowns using two optical coherence tomography (OCT) systems in order to estimate inter-system variations.

Materials and methods: Ten lithium disilicate and 10 cubic stabilized zirconia crowns were placed on prepared artificial teeth without cement. Marginal discrepancy and internal cement gap of the crowns were assessed on images obtained using a swept source OCT (SS-OCT) and a spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT). Medians and interquartile ranges were calculated for both materials and OCT systems. Thereafter, Wilcoxon signed rank test was carried out.

Results: No significant difference was found between the two OCT systems for absolute marginal discrepancy of either lithium disilicate (SS-OCT: 182 µm, SD-OCT: 214 µm; p = .922) or zirconia crowns (SS-OCT: 116 µm, SD-OCT: 121 µm; p = .232). Regarding internal cement gap, no significant difference was found between the two OCT systems for lithium disilicate crowns (SS-OCT: 128 µm, SD-OCT: 128 µm; p = .064). However, for zirconia crowns the SD-OCT showed significantly higher (p = .027) internal cement gap (92 µm) than the SS-OCT (68 µm). Moreover, it was not possible to assess the internal fit of zirconia crowns in 47% and 34% of the sites using SD-OCT and SS-OCT, respectively.

Conclusions: No significant difference was noted in the ability of SS-OCT and SD-OCT to assess the marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate crowns, nor the marginal fit of zirconia crowns. On the contrary, drawbacks regarding the assessment of internal fit of zirconia crowns using both OCT systems were observed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光学相干断层扫描系统,用于评估陶瓷重建的边缘和内部配合。
目的:使用两种光学相干断层扫描(OCT)系统评估二硅酸锂冠和氧化锆冠的边缘和内部密合度,以估计系统间的差异:将 10 个二硅酸锂冠和 10 个立方体稳定氧化锆冠放置在准备好的人工牙齿上,不使用粘接剂。通过扫描源 OCT(SS-OCT)和光谱域 OCT(SD-OCT)获得的图像评估牙冠的边缘差异和内部骨水泥间隙。计算了两种材料和 OCT 系统的中位数和四分位间范围。然后进行 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验:结果:两种 OCT 系统在二硅酸锂(SS-OCT:182 微米,SD-OCT:214 微米;P = .922)或氧化锆冠(SS-OCT:116 微米,SD-OCT:121 微米;P = .232)的绝对边缘差异方面没有发现明显差异。关于内部水泥间隙,两种 OCT 系统在二硅酸锂冠方面没有发现明显差异(SS-OCT:128 µm,SD-OCT:128 µm;p = .064)。但是,对于氧化锆冠,SD-OCT 显示的内部骨水泥间隙(92 微米)明显高于 SS-OCT(68 微米)(p = .027)。此外,使用 SD-OCT 和 SS-OCT 分别有 47% 和 34% 的部位无法评估氧化锆冠的内部密合度:结论:SS-OCT 和 SD-OCT 在评估二硅酸锂冠的边缘和内部密合度以及氧化锆冠的边缘密合度方面没有明显差异。相反,两种 OCT 系统在评估氧化锆牙冠内部密合度方面都存在缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Root-filling materials for endodontic surgery: biological and clinical aspects. Silane and acid etch cross contamination of dentin and composite reduced µ-tensile bond strength. Recipient of Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry's Young Author Award 2023. Reliability and agreement of root length measurements during orthodontic treatment in images from different CBCT machines using multiplanar reconstruction. The sealing ability of different endodontic biomaterials as an intra-orifice barrier: evaluation with high-performance liquid chromatography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1