{"title":"Pattern Without Process: Eugen Smirnov and the Earliest Project of Numerical Taxonomy (1923-1938).","authors":"Maxim V Vinarski","doi":"10.1007/s10739-022-09688-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The progress towards mathematization or, in a broader context, towards an increased \"objectivity\" is one of the main trends in the development of biological systematics in the past century. It is commonplace to start the history of numerical taxonomy with the works of R. R. Sokal and P. H. A. Sneath that in the 1960s laid the foundations of this school of taxonomy. In this article, I discuss the earliest research program in this field, developed in the 1920s by the Russian entomologist and biometrician Eugen (Evgeniy Sergeevich) Smirnov. The theoretical and methodological grounds of this program are considered based on the published works of Smirnov as well as some archival sources. The influence of Smirnov's evolutionary (mechano-Lamarckian) convictions on the development of this project of \"exact systematics\" is analyzed as well as the author's attempts to establish a novel concept of \"mathematical essentialism\" in animal taxonomy. The probable causes of the failure of Smirnov's project are viewed from both externalist and internalist perspectives, including the opposition to the use of quantitative methods in biology by some of the Lysenkoist ideologists in the USSR. A brief comparison of Smirnov's research program with that developed 40 years later by Sokal and Sneath is provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":51104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Biology","volume":"55 3","pages":"559-583"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Biology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-022-09688-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The progress towards mathematization or, in a broader context, towards an increased "objectivity" is one of the main trends in the development of biological systematics in the past century. It is commonplace to start the history of numerical taxonomy with the works of R. R. Sokal and P. H. A. Sneath that in the 1960s laid the foundations of this school of taxonomy. In this article, I discuss the earliest research program in this field, developed in the 1920s by the Russian entomologist and biometrician Eugen (Evgeniy Sergeevich) Smirnov. The theoretical and methodological grounds of this program are considered based on the published works of Smirnov as well as some archival sources. The influence of Smirnov's evolutionary (mechano-Lamarckian) convictions on the development of this project of "exact systematics" is analyzed as well as the author's attempts to establish a novel concept of "mathematical essentialism" in animal taxonomy. The probable causes of the failure of Smirnov's project are viewed from both externalist and internalist perspectives, including the opposition to the use of quantitative methods in biology by some of the Lysenkoist ideologists in the USSR. A brief comparison of Smirnov's research program with that developed 40 years later by Sokal and Sneath is provided.
向数学化或在更广泛的背景下,向增加“客观性”的进展是上个世纪生物系统学发展的主要趋势之一。用R. R. Sokal和P. H. A. Sneath的著作开始数字分类学的历史是司空见惯的,他们在20世纪60年代奠定了这一分类学流派的基础。在本文中,我将讨论这一领域最早的研究计划,该计划是由俄罗斯昆虫学家和生物计量学家尤金·斯米尔诺夫(Eugen (Evgeniy Sergeevich) Smirnov)在20世纪20年代提出的。该计划的理论和方法依据是基于斯米尔诺夫出版的作品以及一些档案资料。分析了斯米尔诺夫的进化论(机械-拉马克主义)信念对“精确系统学”项目发展的影响,以及作者在动物分类学中建立“数学本质主义”新概念的尝试。斯米尔诺夫项目失败的可能原因可以从外部主义和内部主义两方面来看待,包括苏联一些李森科斯主义思想家反对在生物学中使用定量方法。将斯米尔诺夫的研究计划与40年后索卡尔和斯尼斯的研究计划作了简要比较。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the History of Biology is devoted to the history of the life sciences, with additional interest and concern in philosophical and social issues confronting biology in its varying historical contexts. While all historical epochs are welcome, particular attention has been paid in recent years to developments during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. JHB is a recognized forum for scholarship on Darwin, but pieces that connect Darwinism with broader social and intellectual issues in the life sciences are especially encouraged. The journal serves both the working biologist who needs a full understanding of the historical and philosophical bases of the field and the historian of biology interested in following developments and making historiographical connections with the history of science.