Preliminary Experience of Extracorporeal Cytokine Hemoadsorption during Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Cardiogenic Shock Patients.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-10 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1757300
Jonas Pausch, Julian Mersmann, Oliver D Bhadra, Markus J Barten, Yousuf Al Alassar, Leonie Schulte-Uentrop, Hermann Reichenspurner, Alexander M Bernhardt
{"title":"Preliminary Experience of Extracorporeal Cytokine Hemoadsorption during Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Cardiogenic Shock Patients.","authors":"Jonas Pausch, Julian Mersmann, Oliver D Bhadra, Markus J Barten, Yousuf Al Alassar, Leonie Schulte-Uentrop, Hermann Reichenspurner, Alexander M Bernhardt","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Systemic inflammation due to cardiogenic shock is associated with vasoplegia leading to organ hypoperfusion, right heart failure, and poor clinical outcome. Extracorporeal cytokine hemoadsorption emerged to attenuate excessive levels of inflammatory cytokines, potentially improving patient outcomes. Nevertheless, its prognostic impact during high-risk left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> In total, 40 consecutive patients with advanced heart failure underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation at our institution between 2018 and 2020. Out of 25 high-risk patients in cardiogenic shock (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 and 2), 9 patients (<i>CytoSorb group</i>) underwent LVAD implantation with and 16 patients (<i>control group</i>) without simultaneous cytokine hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass. Besides preoperative patient characteristics, postoperative lactate clearance, vasopressor administration and mean arterial pressure, perioperative complication, and 30-day mortality rates were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Apart from an increased rate of reoperations within the CytoSorb group, baseline characteristics including the severity of ventricular dysfunction and consecutive signs of end-organ failure were similar in both groups. Preoperative short-term mechanical circulatory support bridging was comparable (66.7 vs. 75%; <i>p</i> = 0.66) prior to LVAD implantation. Procedural characteristics including intraoperative volume management and postoperative vasopressor administration were similar in both groups. There was no difference regarding postoperative lactate clearance, although postoperative mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in the control group (71.3 vs. 57.4 mm Hg; <i>p</i> < 0.01). Furthermore, the 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the CytoSorb group (33.3 vs. 0.0%; <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Extracorporeal cytokine hemoadsorption during high-risk LVAD implantation was not associated with a decrease of postoperative vasopressor support, improved hemodynamics, or an accelerated lactate clearance.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"266-272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Systemic inflammation due to cardiogenic shock is associated with vasoplegia leading to organ hypoperfusion, right heart failure, and poor clinical outcome. Extracorporeal cytokine hemoadsorption emerged to attenuate excessive levels of inflammatory cytokines, potentially improving patient outcomes. Nevertheless, its prognostic impact during high-risk left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains unknown.

Methods:  In total, 40 consecutive patients with advanced heart failure underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation at our institution between 2018 and 2020. Out of 25 high-risk patients in cardiogenic shock (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 and 2), 9 patients (CytoSorb group) underwent LVAD implantation with and 16 patients (control group) without simultaneous cytokine hemoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass. Besides preoperative patient characteristics, postoperative lactate clearance, vasopressor administration and mean arterial pressure, perioperative complication, and 30-day mortality rates were retrospectively analyzed.

Results:  Apart from an increased rate of reoperations within the CytoSorb group, baseline characteristics including the severity of ventricular dysfunction and consecutive signs of end-organ failure were similar in both groups. Preoperative short-term mechanical circulatory support bridging was comparable (66.7 vs. 75%; p = 0.66) prior to LVAD implantation. Procedural characteristics including intraoperative volume management and postoperative vasopressor administration were similar in both groups. There was no difference regarding postoperative lactate clearance, although postoperative mean arterial pressure was significantly higher in the control group (71.3 vs. 57.4 mm Hg; p < 0.01). Furthermore, the 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the CytoSorb group (33.3 vs. 0.0%; p = 0.01).

Conclusion:  Extracorporeal cytokine hemoadsorption during high-risk LVAD implantation was not associated with a decrease of postoperative vasopressor support, improved hemodynamics, or an accelerated lactate clearance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心源性休克患者在植入左心室辅助装置期间进行体外细胞因子吸血的初步经验。
背景:心源性休克引起的全身炎症与血管痉挛有关,导致器官灌注不足、右心衰竭和不良的临床预后。体外细胞因子吸血疗法的出现可减轻过高的炎症细胞因子水平,从而改善患者的预后。然而,在高风险左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入过程中,其对预后的影响仍是未知数:2018年至2020年间,我院共连续为40名晚期心衰患者进行了持续流式LVAD植入术。在25名心源性休克高危患者(机械辅助循环支持机构间注册资料1和2)中,9名患者(CytoSorb组)接受了LVAD植入术,16名患者(对照组)在心肺旁路过程中未同时进行细胞因子吸血。除术前患者特征外,还回顾性分析了术后乳酸清除率、血管加压药用量和平均动脉压、围手术期并发症和30天死亡率:除了 CytoSorb 组的再手术率增加外,两组患者的基线特征(包括心室功能障碍的严重程度和内脏衰竭的连续征兆)相似。在植入LVAD之前,术前短期机械循环支持桥接率相当(66.7% vs. 75%; p = 0.66)。两组患者的术中容量管理和术后使用血管加压素等手术特征相似。虽然对照组的术后平均动脉压明显更高(71.3 vs. 57.4 mm Hg; p p = 0.01),但两组术后乳酸清除率没有差异:结论:在高风险 LVAD 植入术中进行体外细胞因子吸血与减少术后血管加压支持、改善血液动力学或加速乳酸清除无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon publishes articles of the highest standard from internationally recognized thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, physiologists, and pathologists. This journal is an essential resource for anyone working in this field. Original articles, short communications, reviews and important meeting announcements keep you abreast of key clinical advances, as well as providing the theoretical background of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Case reports are published in our Open Access companion journal The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Multiarterial Grafting in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Off-Pump Revascularization in Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation. Crural Diaphragm Density in Respiratory Complications after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy. Long-term Survival in Elderly Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Compared to the Age-matched General Population: A Meta-analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data. Echocardiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Concomitant Secondary Chordal Cutting to Surgical Myectomy in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1