Minimal intervention procedures: evaluating how much pediatric dentists really know about this field.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2022-10-10 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0124
Laércio Alves de Amorim Junior, Bárbara Rodrigues Braga, Caio Gomes Castro, Patrícia Corrêa-Faria
{"title":"Minimal intervention procedures: evaluating how much pediatric dentists really know about this field.","authors":"Laércio Alves de Amorim Junior,&nbsp;Bárbara Rodrigues Braga,&nbsp;Caio Gomes Castro,&nbsp;Patrícia Corrêa-Faria","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate how much pediatric dentists know about the noninvasive, micro, and minimally invasive strategies for managing caries lesions in deciduous teeth. An electronic questionnaire was sent to pediatric dentists enrolled in the Regional Board of Dentistry. Information was collected concerning: 1) characteristics of the participants; 2) level of updated knowledge of noninvasive, micro and minimally invasive procedures for caries management in children; 3) agreement to sentences on the indicated procedures. The data were analyzed descriptively and with bivariate tests. Seventy pediatric dentists participated. Results showed high frequency of agreement with sentences on strategies for lesion caries management: 92.8% with the sentence on selective removal of decayed tissue; 90.0% on fluoridated toothpaste (≥1,000 ppm); 84.3% on silver diamine fluoride (SDF); 80.0% on the Hall technique; and 76.9% on the sealing of small dentine lesions. Level of agreement with sentences was not significantly related to variables of time since graduation, degree of updatedness, area of employment, or higher education degree (p > 0.05). A higher score on agreement toward SDF use was accompanied by a greater degree of self-declared updatedness on noninvasive, micro and minimally invasive procedures for caries management in children (rho 0.259; p = 0.031). Pediatric dentists consider themselves updated and agree with the sentences on recommended use of fluoridated toothpaste as of eruption of the first tooth, and on the selective removal of decayed tissue. Disagreement still continues regarding application of SDF to arrest lesion progression, sealing of small dentin lesions, and the Hall technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate how much pediatric dentists know about the noninvasive, micro, and minimally invasive strategies for managing caries lesions in deciduous teeth. An electronic questionnaire was sent to pediatric dentists enrolled in the Regional Board of Dentistry. Information was collected concerning: 1) characteristics of the participants; 2) level of updated knowledge of noninvasive, micro and minimally invasive procedures for caries management in children; 3) agreement to sentences on the indicated procedures. The data were analyzed descriptively and with bivariate tests. Seventy pediatric dentists participated. Results showed high frequency of agreement with sentences on strategies for lesion caries management: 92.8% with the sentence on selective removal of decayed tissue; 90.0% on fluoridated toothpaste (≥1,000 ppm); 84.3% on silver diamine fluoride (SDF); 80.0% on the Hall technique; and 76.9% on the sealing of small dentine lesions. Level of agreement with sentences was not significantly related to variables of time since graduation, degree of updatedness, area of employment, or higher education degree (p > 0.05). A higher score on agreement toward SDF use was accompanied by a greater degree of self-declared updatedness on noninvasive, micro and minimally invasive procedures for caries management in children (rho 0.259; p = 0.031). Pediatric dentists consider themselves updated and agree with the sentences on recommended use of fluoridated toothpaste as of eruption of the first tooth, and on the selective removal of decayed tissue. Disagreement still continues regarding application of SDF to arrest lesion progression, sealing of small dentin lesions, and the Hall technique.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最小干预程序:评估儿科牙医对这一领域的真正了解程度。
这项横断面研究的目的是评估儿科牙医对无创、微创和微创治疗乳牙龋齿的策略了解多少。一份电子问卷被发送给在地区牙科委员会注册的儿科牙医。收集的信息包括:1)参与者的特征;2)无创、微创和微创治疗儿童龋齿的最新知识水平;(三)对指定程序的判决意见一致。对数据进行描述性分析和双变量检验。70名儿科牙医参与了研究。结果表明:龋损处理策略与句子的一致性较高:选择清除龋坏组织句的一致性为92.8%;含氟牙膏占90.0%(≥1,000 ppm);氟化二胺银(SDF)占84.3%;霍尔技术占80.0%;对牙本质小病变的封堵率为76.9%。对句子的认同程度与毕业时间、更新程度、就业地区、高等教育程度等变量无显著相关(p > 0.05)。对SDF使用的认同得分越高,儿童龋齿管理的无创、微创和微创手术的自我更新程度也越高(rho 0.259;P = 0.031)。儿科牙医认为自己是最新的,并同意建议在第一颗牙齿出牙时使用含氟牙膏的句子,以及有选择地去除腐烂的组织。关于应用SDF阻止病变进展、封闭小牙本质病变和Hall技术的分歧仍然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Do SOD2 and SOD3 gene polymorphisms impact the oral health-related quality of life in Para athletes? Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage stress and cuspal strain in natural and typodont teeth. Exploring the factors driving higher interactions in false amber necklace posts on Facebook. Impact of COVID-19 on pediatric dental care in two epicenters: Italy and Brazil. Impact of streptozotocin-induced diabetes on experimental masseter pain in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1