Could surgical transepicondylar axis be identified accurately in preoperative 3D planning for total knee arthroplasty? A reproducibility study based on 3D-CT.
Kai Lei, Li Ming Liu, Jiang Ming Luo, Chao Ma, Qing Feng, Liu Yang, Lin Guo
{"title":"Could surgical transepicondylar axis be identified accurately in preoperative 3D planning for total knee arthroplasty? A reproducibility study based on 3D-CT.","authors":"Kai Lei, Li Ming Liu, Jiang Ming Luo, Chao Ma, Qing Feng, Liu Yang, Lin Guo","doi":"10.1186/s42836-022-00147-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) is frequently used for positioning of femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous studies showed that intraoperative identification of sTEA was not reliable. While surgeons or engineers need to identify sTEA with three-dimensional (3D) computer-aid techniques pre- or intraoperatively, the reproducibility of sTEA identification on preoperative 3D images has not been explored yet. This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of identifying sTEA in preoperative planning based on computed tomography (CT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-nine consecutive patients (60 knees involved) who received TKA in our center from April 2019 to June 2019 were included in this study. Six experienced TKA surgeons identified sTEA three times on 3D model established on the basis of knee CT data. The projection angle of each sTEA and the posterior condyle axis on the transverse plane were measured and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall intra-observer reproducibility was moderate. The median intra-observer variation was 1.27°, with a maximum being up to 14.07°. The median inter-observer variation was 1.24°, and the maximum was 11.47°. The overall intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-observer was 0.528 (95% CI 0.417, 0.643).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The identification of sTEA on a 3D model established on the basis of knee CT data may not be reliable. Combined with the previous cadaveric and surgical studies, caution should be exercised in determining femoral component rotation by referencing sTEA both preoperatively and intraoperatively.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9575283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00147-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Surgical transepicondylar axis (sTEA) is frequently used for positioning of femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous studies showed that intraoperative identification of sTEA was not reliable. While surgeons or engineers need to identify sTEA with three-dimensional (3D) computer-aid techniques pre- or intraoperatively, the reproducibility of sTEA identification on preoperative 3D images has not been explored yet. This study aimed to investigate the reproducibility of identifying sTEA in preoperative planning based on computed tomography (CT).
Methods: Fifty-nine consecutive patients (60 knees involved) who received TKA in our center from April 2019 to June 2019 were included in this study. Six experienced TKA surgeons identified sTEA three times on 3D model established on the basis of knee CT data. The projection angle of each sTEA and the posterior condyle axis on the transverse plane were measured and analyzed.
Results: The overall intra-observer reproducibility was moderate. The median intra-observer variation was 1.27°, with a maximum being up to 14.07°. The median inter-observer variation was 1.24°, and the maximum was 11.47°. The overall intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for inter-observer was 0.528 (95% CI 0.417, 0.643).
Conclusion: The identification of sTEA on a 3D model established on the basis of knee CT data may not be reliable. Combined with the previous cadaveric and surgical studies, caution should be exercised in determining femoral component rotation by referencing sTEA both preoperatively and intraoperatively.
背景:手术经耻骨髁轴(sTEA)是全膝关节置换术(TKA)中常用的股骨假体旋转定位方法。以往的研究表明术中sTEA的鉴定不可靠。虽然外科医生或工程师需要在术前或术中使用三维(3D)计算机辅助技术识别sTEA,但术前3D图像识别sTEA的可重复性尚未得到探讨。本研究旨在探讨基于计算机断层扫描(CT)在术前计划中识别sTEA的可重复性。方法:本研究纳入2019年4月至2019年6月在我中心连续接受TKA的59例患者(60例涉及膝关节)。6名经验丰富的TKA外科医生根据膝关节CT数据建立的3D模型三次识别出sTEA。测量并分析各sTEA与后髁轴在横切面上的投影角度。结果:整体观察者内重现性为中等。观察者内部变异的中位数为1.27°,最大值可达14.07°。观察者间变异的中位数为1.24°,最大值为11.47°。观察者间的总体类内相关系数(ICC)为0.528 (95% CI 0.417, 0.643)。结论:基于膝关节CT数据建立的三维模型对sTEA的识别可能不可靠。结合先前的尸体和手术研究,术前和术中通过参考sTEA来确定股骨组成部分旋转时应谨慎。证据水平:III。