[Examination of the relationship between preference for solitude and emotional well-being after controlling for the effect of loneliness].

Q4 Psychology Shinrigaku Kenkyu Pub Date : 2015-06-01 DOI:10.4992/jjpsy.86.13234
Aya Toyoshima, Shinichi Sato
{"title":"[Examination of the relationship between preference for solitude and emotional well-being after controlling for the effect of loneliness].","authors":"Aya Toyoshima,&nbsp;Shinichi Sato","doi":"10.4992/jjpsy.86.13234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined whether preference for solitude promotes emotional well-being after controlling for the influence of loneliness. We administered a questionnaire that included variables regarding preference for solitude, loneliness, positive affect, and negative affect. The sample consisted of 318 young adult university students and 253 individuals aged 65 and older. The results showed a significant negative correlation between preference for solitude and positive affect; however there was no correlation between preference for solitude and negative affect. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis confirmed a negative effect of preference for solitude on negative affect after controlling for the influence of loneliness, and there was no effect on positive affect. The results of this study supported the hypothesis concerning, the relationship between preference for solitude and negative affect, and demonstrated that preference for solitude decreased negative affect and promotes emotional well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":53680,"journal":{"name":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4992/jjpsy.86.13234","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shinrigaku Kenkyu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.86.13234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This study examined whether preference for solitude promotes emotional well-being after controlling for the influence of loneliness. We administered a questionnaire that included variables regarding preference for solitude, loneliness, positive affect, and negative affect. The sample consisted of 318 young adult university students and 253 individuals aged 65 and older. The results showed a significant negative correlation between preference for solitude and positive affect; however there was no correlation between preference for solitude and negative affect. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis confirmed a negative effect of preference for solitude on negative affect after controlling for the influence of loneliness, and there was no effect on positive affect. The results of this study supported the hypothesis concerning, the relationship between preference for solitude and negative affect, and demonstrated that preference for solitude decreased negative affect and promotes emotional well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[在控制了孤独的影响后,对孤独偏好和情绪健康之间关系的检验]。
本研究考察了在控制了孤独的影响后,对独处的偏好是否会促进情绪健康。我们进行了一份问卷调查,其中包括对孤独、孤独、积极影响和消极影响的偏好。样本包括318名年轻的成年大学生和253名65岁及以上的老年人。结果表明,孤独偏好与积极情绪呈显著负相关;然而,对孤独的偏好与消极情绪之间没有相关性。层次多元回归分析在控制了孤独感的影响后,证实了孤独偏好对消极情绪的负向影响,而对积极情绪没有影响。本研究的结果支持了孤独偏好与消极情绪之间关系的假设,并证明了孤独偏好减少了消极情绪,促进了情绪健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shinrigaku Kenkyu
Shinrigaku Kenkyu Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Development of the Japanese version of the Peer Conflict Scale Development of the Japanese version of the Theories of Mind Wandering Scale and testing its reliability and validity Development of the Japanese version of the Financial Threat Scale Do changes in beliefs improve creativity? Investigation of an odor intensity evaluation:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1