Shockwave lithotripsy with renoprotective pause is associated with renovascular vasoconstriction in humans.

Michael Bailey, Franklin Lee, Ryan Hsi, Marla Paun, Barbrina Dunmire, Ziyue Liu, Mathew Sorensen, Jonathan Harper
{"title":"Shockwave lithotripsy with renoprotective pause is associated with renovascular vasoconstriction in humans.","authors":"Michael Bailey,&nbsp;Franklin Lee,&nbsp;Ryan Hsi,&nbsp;Marla Paun,&nbsp;Barbrina Dunmire,&nbsp;Ziyue Liu,&nbsp;Mathew Sorensen,&nbsp;Jonathan Harper","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animal studies have shown that shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) delivered with an initial course of low-energy shocks followed by a pause reduces renal injury. The pause correlates with increased arterial resistive index (RI) during SWL as measured by ultrasound. This suggests that renal vasoconstriction is associated with protecting the kidney from injury. This study explored whether a similar increase in RI is observed in humans. Patients were prospectively recruited from two hospitals. All received an initial dose of 250 lowest energy shocks followed by a two-minute pause. Shock power was then ramped up at the discretion of the physician; shock rate was maintained at 1 Hz. Spectral Doppler velocity measurements were taken from an interlobar artery at baseline after induction, during the pause at 250 shocks, after 750 shocks, after 1500 shocks, and at the end of the procedure. RI was calculated from the peak systolic and end diastolic velocities and a linear mixed-effects model was used to compare RIs. The statistical model accounted for age, gender, laterality, and body mass index (BMI). Measurements were taken from 15 patients. Average RI ± standard deviation pretreatment, after 250 shocks, after 750 shocks, after 1500 shocks, and post treatment was 0.68 ± 0.06, 0.71 ± 0.07, 0.73 ± 0.06, 0.75 ± 0.07 and 0.75 ± 0.06, respectively. RI was found to be significantly higher after 250 shocks compared to pretreatment (p = 0.04). RI did not correlate with age, gender, BMI, or treatment side. This is suggestive that allowing a pause for renal vascular vasoconstriction to develop may be beneficial, and can be monitored for during SWL, providing real-time feedback as to when the kidney is protected.</p>","PeriodicalId":73288,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium","volume":"2014 ","pages":"1013-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0248","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2014.0248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal studies have shown that shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) delivered with an initial course of low-energy shocks followed by a pause reduces renal injury. The pause correlates with increased arterial resistive index (RI) during SWL as measured by ultrasound. This suggests that renal vasoconstriction is associated with protecting the kidney from injury. This study explored whether a similar increase in RI is observed in humans. Patients were prospectively recruited from two hospitals. All received an initial dose of 250 lowest energy shocks followed by a two-minute pause. Shock power was then ramped up at the discretion of the physician; shock rate was maintained at 1 Hz. Spectral Doppler velocity measurements were taken from an interlobar artery at baseline after induction, during the pause at 250 shocks, after 750 shocks, after 1500 shocks, and at the end of the procedure. RI was calculated from the peak systolic and end diastolic velocities and a linear mixed-effects model was used to compare RIs. The statistical model accounted for age, gender, laterality, and body mass index (BMI). Measurements were taken from 15 patients. Average RI ± standard deviation pretreatment, after 250 shocks, after 750 shocks, after 1500 shocks, and post treatment was 0.68 ± 0.06, 0.71 ± 0.07, 0.73 ± 0.06, 0.75 ± 0.07 and 0.75 ± 0.06, respectively. RI was found to be significantly higher after 250 shocks compared to pretreatment (p = 0.04). RI did not correlate with age, gender, BMI, or treatment side. This is suggestive that allowing a pause for renal vascular vasoconstriction to develop may be beneficial, and can be monitored for during SWL, providing real-time feedback as to when the kidney is protected.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伴有肾保护暂停的冲击波碎石术与人类肾血管收缩有关。
动物研究表明,冲击波碎石术(SWL)以低能量休克为初始过程,然后暂停,可减少肾脏损伤。超声测量SWL期间,暂停与动脉阻力指数(RI)增加相关。这表明肾脏血管收缩与保护肾脏免受损伤有关。这项研究探讨了是否在人类中观察到类似的RI增加。前瞻性地从两家医院招募患者。所有人都接受了250次最低能量冲击的初始剂量,然后暂停两分钟。然后根据医生的判断加大电击力度;电击频率维持在1hz。在诱导后的基线、250次冲击后的暂停、750次冲击后、1500次冲击后和手术结束时,从叶间动脉处测量频谱多普勒速度。从收缩峰值和舒张末期速度计算RI,并使用线性混合效应模型来比较RI。统计模型考虑了年龄、性别、侧卧和身体质量指数(BMI)。对15名患者进行了测量。预处理、250次、750次、1500次和处理后的平均RI±标准差分别为0.68±0.06、0.71±0.07、0.73±0.06、0.75±0.07和0.75±0.06。与预处理相比,250次冲击后的RI显著升高(p = 0.04)。RI与年龄、性别、BMI或治疗方无关。这提示允许肾脏血管收缩的暂停发展可能是有益的,并且可以在SWL期间进行监测,提供肾脏何时受到保护的实时反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for assessing blood flow modulation of hepatocellular carcinoma by hydralazine. Machine learning improves early detection of liver fibrosis by quantitative ultrasound radiomics. Anatomical Feature-Based Lung Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment Using Deep Convolutional Neural Network. Three-dimensional evaluation of microvascular networks using contrast-enhanced ultrasound and microbubble tracking. Three-dimensional super-resolution ultrasound imaging of chicken embryos - A validation framework for analysis of microvascular morphology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1