Influence of cardiovascular risk factors on infarct size and interaction with mechanical ischaemic postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2015-08-06 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2014-000175
Sophie Pichot, Nathan Mewton, Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant, Francois Roubille, Gilles Rioufol, Céline Giraud, Inesse Boussaha, Olivier Lairez, Meyer Elbaz, Christophe Piot, Denis Angoulvant, Michel Ovize
{"title":"Influence of cardiovascular risk factors on infarct size and interaction with mechanical ischaemic postconditioning in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.","authors":"Sophie Pichot,&nbsp;Nathan Mewton,&nbsp;Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant,&nbsp;Francois Roubille,&nbsp;Gilles Rioufol,&nbsp;Céline Giraud,&nbsp;Inesse Boussaha,&nbsp;Olivier Lairez,&nbsp;Meyer Elbaz,&nbsp;Christophe Piot,&nbsp;Denis Angoulvant,&nbsp;Michel Ovize","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2014-000175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous studies have shown that mechanical postconditioning (PostC) significantly reduces infarct size (IS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Our objective was to assess the influence of traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors on IS and their interaction with ischaemic PostC in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study population was constituted from the clinical database pooling of four previously published PostC prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label controlled trials with identical inclusion criteria. Patients with STEMI, presenting within 12 h of symptoms onset referred for percutaneous coronary intervention, were included. Mechanical ischaemic PostC was performed by four repeated cycles of inflation-deflation of the angioplasty balloon within 1 min of reflow, while the control group underwent no intervention. IS was assessed by measuring total creatine kinase release over 72 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>173 patients, aged 58±12 years, 76% males, 48% anterior infarct were included (82 in the PostC group, 91 in the control group). IS was significantly reduced in the PostC compared to the control group (71.7±41.6 vs 88.2±54.5×10(3) arbitrary units; p=0.027). After adjustment for abnormally contracting segments, older patients had smaller IS and smokers had larger IS. Gender, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and obesity did not have any significant effect on IS. Multivariate regression analysis showed that none of the traditional risk factors had a significant impact on the cardioprotective effect of mechanical ischaemic PostC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present analysis suggests that the cardioprotective effect of mechanical PostC is not influenced by traditional CV risk factors that are prevalent in patients with STEMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"2 1","pages":"e000175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000175","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2014-000175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies have shown that mechanical postconditioning (PostC) significantly reduces infarct size (IS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Our objective was to assess the influence of traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors on IS and their interaction with ischaemic PostC in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods: The study population was constituted from the clinical database pooling of four previously published PostC prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label controlled trials with identical inclusion criteria. Patients with STEMI, presenting within 12 h of symptoms onset referred for percutaneous coronary intervention, were included. Mechanical ischaemic PostC was performed by four repeated cycles of inflation-deflation of the angioplasty balloon within 1 min of reflow, while the control group underwent no intervention. IS was assessed by measuring total creatine kinase release over 72 h.

Results: 173 patients, aged 58±12 years, 76% males, 48% anterior infarct were included (82 in the PostC group, 91 in the control group). IS was significantly reduced in the PostC compared to the control group (71.7±41.6 vs 88.2±54.5×10(3) arbitrary units; p=0.027). After adjustment for abnormally contracting segments, older patients had smaller IS and smokers had larger IS. Gender, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and obesity did not have any significant effect on IS. Multivariate regression analysis showed that none of the traditional risk factors had a significant impact on the cardioprotective effect of mechanical ischaemic PostC.

Conclusions: The present analysis suggests that the cardioprotective effect of mechanical PostC is not influenced by traditional CV risk factors that are prevalent in patients with STEMI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
st段抬高型心肌梗死中心血管危险因素对梗死面积的影响及其与机械缺血后处理的相互作用
目的:先前的研究表明,机械后处理(PostC)可显著降低急性心肌梗死患者的梗死面积(IS)。我们的目的是评估传统心血管(CV)危险因素对急性st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者IS的影响及其与缺血性后c的相互作用。方法:研究人群来自四个先前发表的PostC前瞻性、多中心、随机、开放标签对照试验的临床数据库池,这些试验具有相同的纳入标准。STEMI患者,在症状发作12小时内出现经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。机械性缺血PostC在血流后1分钟内通过血管成形术球囊的充气-充气4次重复循环进行,而对照组则不进行干预。通过测量72 h内总肌酸激酶释放量来评估IS。结果:173例患者,年龄58±12岁,男性76%,前叶梗死48% (PostC组82例,对照组91例)。与对照组相比,后c组IS显著降低(71.7±41.6 vs 88.2±54.5×10)(3)任意单位;p = 0.027)。调整异常收缩节段后,老年患者IS较小,吸烟者IS较大。性别、糖尿病、高血压、血脂异常和肥胖对IS无显著影响。多因素回归分析显示,传统危险因素均未对机械缺血后置c的心脏保护作用产生显著影响。结论:目前的分析表明,机械PostC的心脏保护作用不受STEMI患者中普遍存在的传统CV危险因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
External validation of the SMART2 model for recurrent cardiovascular risk: performance in socioeconomic, ethnic and psychiatric subgroups. Overview of direct oral anticoagulation trends in the Bronx: case control study of patient and systemic factors in medication non-adherence. In-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients with different medical funds: an analysis from Thai PCI registry. CT coronary angiography guided treatment versus routine invasive coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic utility of stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and inconclusive exercise stress testing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1