Ovarian reserve in women of late reproductive age by the method of treatment of PCOS.

Ketevan Beltadze, Ludmila Barbakadze
{"title":"Ovarian reserve in women of late reproductive age by the method of treatment of PCOS.","authors":"Ketevan Beltadze,&nbsp;Ludmila Barbakadze","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) particularly is increased in adolescents. Very few longitudinal follow-up for assessment of ovarian reserve in women of late reproductive age with previously confirmed PCOS have been conducted, especially after its diagnosis and treatment in adolescence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to compare of the ovarian reserve of the women of late reproductive age by the method of treatment of PCOS in adolescence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross sectional study in an unselected population was conducted from January to June 2014. A total of 123 women of late reproductive age were included. They had been diagnosed with PCOS between 1984 and 1990 when they were 13-18 yr. From these, first group of the study was consisted of 67 participants who underwent conservative treatment with antiandrogens and combined oral contraceptives and second group of the study was consisted of 56 participants after surgery (34-bilateral ovarian drilling and 22- ovarian wedge resection). At the time of investigation patients were 35-45 yr. The participants were collected via analysis of histories at primary diagnosis of PCOS in adolescence and at the time of the investigation analyses of reproductive hormones were conducted. Data were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After conservative treatment PCOS women had higher levels of anti- mullerian hormone and lower follicle-stimulating hormone levels (p=0.02 and p=0.04, respectively). The number of antral follicles and mean ovarian volume were significantly greater also, than in women who underwent surgical treatment (p=0.03 and p=0.04, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that PCOS patients who underwent conservative treatment have the better ovarian reserve than women who underwent surgical treatment of PCOS in adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":14673,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine","volume":"13 5","pages":"263-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4515232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) particularly is increased in adolescents. Very few longitudinal follow-up for assessment of ovarian reserve in women of late reproductive age with previously confirmed PCOS have been conducted, especially after its diagnosis and treatment in adolescence.

Objective: The aim of the present study was to compare of the ovarian reserve of the women of late reproductive age by the method of treatment of PCOS in adolescence.

Materials and methods: This cross sectional study in an unselected population was conducted from January to June 2014. A total of 123 women of late reproductive age were included. They had been diagnosed with PCOS between 1984 and 1990 when they were 13-18 yr. From these, first group of the study was consisted of 67 participants who underwent conservative treatment with antiandrogens and combined oral contraceptives and second group of the study was consisted of 56 participants after surgery (34-bilateral ovarian drilling and 22- ovarian wedge resection). At the time of investigation patients were 35-45 yr. The participants were collected via analysis of histories at primary diagnosis of PCOS in adolescence and at the time of the investigation analyses of reproductive hormones were conducted. Data were compared between the groups.

Results: After conservative treatment PCOS women had higher levels of anti- mullerian hormone and lower follicle-stimulating hormone levels (p=0.02 and p=0.04, respectively). The number of antral follicles and mean ovarian volume were significantly greater also, than in women who underwent surgical treatment (p=0.03 and p=0.04, respectively).

Conclusion: Our data suggest that PCOS patients who underwent conservative treatment have the better ovarian reserve than women who underwent surgical treatment of PCOS in adolescence.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卵巢储备在晚育龄妇女多囊卵巢综合征的治疗方法。
背景:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)的患病率在青少年中尤其增加。对已确诊PCOS的晚育龄妇女进行卵巢储备评估的纵向随访很少,特别是在青春期诊断和治疗后。目的:比较青春期多囊卵巢综合征治疗方法对晚期育龄妇女卵巢储备功能的影响。材料和方法:本横断面研究于2014年1月至6月在未选择的人群中进行。共纳入123名育龄晚期妇女。她们在1984年至1990年间13-18岁时被诊断为多囊卵巢综合征。其中,第一组研究包括67名接受抗雄激素和联合口服避孕药保守治疗的参与者,第二组研究包括56名接受手术(34名双侧卵巢钻孔和22名卵巢楔形切除术)的参与者。调查时,患者年龄为35-45岁。调查时,通过分析青少年初诊多囊卵巢综合征的病史和生殖激素的分析来收集参与者。比较两组数据。结果:经保守治疗后,PCOS患者抗苗勒管激素水平升高,促卵泡激素水平降低(p=0.02和p=0.04)。与接受手术治疗的女性相比,卵巢窦卵泡数量和平均卵巢体积也显著增加(p=0.03和p=0.04)。结论:保守治疗的PCOS患者卵巢储备能力优于手术治疗的PCOS患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The status of depression and anxiety in infertile Turkish couples Vaginal compared oral administration of estradiol in women with thin endometrium: A cross-sectional study Corrigendum to “Interstitial ectopic pregnancy diagnosis by three-dimensional ultrasound and its laparoscopic management: A case report” [Int J Reprod BioMed 2019; 17: 945-950] A new strategy and system for the ex vivo ovary perfusion and cryopreservation: An innovation The etiologies of DNA abnormalities in male infertility: An assessment and review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1