Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Dynamic Rotator Stability Test-A Cross Sectional study.

K V Binoy Mathew, Charu Eapen, P Senthil Kumar
{"title":"Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Dynamic Rotator Stability Test-A Cross Sectional study.","authors":"K V Binoy Mathew,&nbsp;Charu Eapen,&nbsp;P Senthil Kumar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>To find intra rater and inter rater reliability of Dynamic Rotator Stability Test (DRST) and to find concurrent validity of Dynamic Rotator Stability Test (DRST) with University of Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PENN) Scale.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>40 subjects of either gender between the age group of 18-70 with painful shoulder conditions of musculoskeletal origin was selected through convenient sampling. Tester 1 and tester 2 administered DRST and PENN scale randomly. In a subgroup of 20 subjects DRST was administered by both the testers to find the inter rater reliability. 180° Standard Universal Goniometer was used to take measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For intra-rater reliability, all the test variables were showing highly significant correlation (p=.94 - 1). For inter -rater, with tester 2, test variables like position, ROM, force, direction of abnormal translation, pain during the test, compensatory movement during test were found to be significant (p=.71-1).only some variables of DRST showed significant correlation with PENN scale (P=.320-.450).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dynamic Rotator Stability Test has good intra rater and moderate inter rater reliability. Concurrent validity of Dynamic Rotator Stability Test was found to be poor when compared to PENN Shoulder Score.</p>","PeriodicalId":91085,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of physiotherapy and occupational therapy","volume":"6 3","pages":"76-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551409/pdf/nihms286533.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of physiotherapy and occupational therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: To find intra rater and inter rater reliability of Dynamic Rotator Stability Test (DRST) and to find concurrent validity of Dynamic Rotator Stability Test (DRST) with University of Pennsylvania Shoulder Score (PENN) Scale.

Material and method: 40 subjects of either gender between the age group of 18-70 with painful shoulder conditions of musculoskeletal origin was selected through convenient sampling. Tester 1 and tester 2 administered DRST and PENN scale randomly. In a subgroup of 20 subjects DRST was administered by both the testers to find the inter rater reliability. 180° Standard Universal Goniometer was used to take measurements.

Results: For intra-rater reliability, all the test variables were showing highly significant correlation (p=.94 - 1). For inter -rater, with tester 2, test variables like position, ROM, force, direction of abnormal translation, pain during the test, compensatory movement during test were found to be significant (p=.71-1).only some variables of DRST showed significant correlation with PENN scale (P=.320-.450).

Conclusion: Dynamic Rotator Stability Test has good intra rater and moderate inter rater reliability. Concurrent validity of Dynamic Rotator Stability Test was found to be poor when compared to PENN Shoulder Score.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
旋转体动态稳定性试验的信度与并行效度——横断面研究。
研究目的:探讨动态旋转体稳定性测试(DRST)的评级内信度和评级间信度,以及动态旋转体稳定性测试(DRST)与宾夕法尼亚大学肩部评分(PENN)量表的并发效度。材料与方法:采用方便抽样的方法,选取年龄在18-70岁之间、患有肌肉骨骼源性肩痛的男女各40例。测试者1和测试者2随机执行DRST和PENN量表。在一个由20名受试者组成的亚组中,两位测试者都进行了DRST测试,以寻找量表间的信度。使用180°标准通用测角仪进行测量。结果:在量表内信度方面,所有测试变量均呈极显著相关(p=。94 -1)。对于inter -rater,在测试2中,位置、ROM、力、异常平移方向、测试过程中的疼痛、测试过程中的代偿运动等测试变量被发现是显著的(p=.71-1)。只有部分DRST变量与PENN量表有显著相关(P= 0.320 ~ 0.450)。结论:动态旋转器稳定性试验具有良好的组内信度和中等的组间信度。与PENN肩部评分相比,动态旋转体稳定性测试的并发效度较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Dynamic Rotator Stability Test-A Cross Sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1