Clinical features and prognosis of prostate cancer with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Korean Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2015-08-01 Epub Date: 2015-07-24 DOI:10.4111/kju.2015.56.8.565
Donghyun Lee, Chunwoo Lee, Taekmin Kwon, Dalsan You, In Gab Jeong, Jun Hyuk Hong, Hanjong Ahn, Choung-Soo Kim
{"title":"Clinical features and prognosis of prostate cancer with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.","authors":"Donghyun Lee,&nbsp;Chunwoo Lee,&nbsp;Taekmin Kwon,&nbsp;Dalsan You,&nbsp;In Gab Jeong,&nbsp;Jun Hyuk Hong,&nbsp;Hanjong Ahn,&nbsp;Choung-Soo Kim","doi":"10.4111/kju.2015.56.8.565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the clinical features and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer (PCa) with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 893 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy for PCa between 2011 and 2012 at Asan Medical Center; 752 of these patients who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy and were followed up for more than 1 year were included. The cohort was divided into two groups-patients with and without HGPIN-and their characteristics were compared. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze factors affecting BCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 652 study patients (86.7%) had HGPIN. There were no significant differences in preoperative factors between the two groups, including age (p=0.369) and preoperative prostate-specific antigen concentration (p=0.234). Patients with HGPIN had a higher Gleason score (p=0.012), more frequent multiple tumor (p=0.013), and more perineural invasion (p=0.012), but no other postoperative pathologic characteristics were significantly different between the two groups. There were no significant differences in BCR (13.0% vs. 11.5%, p=0.665) and HGPIN was not associated with BCR (p=0.745). In multivariate analysis, only the T stage (p<0.001) was associated with BCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PCa patients with HGPIN have a higher Gleason score, more frequent multiple tumors, and more perineural invasion than those without HGPIN. The presence of HGPIN is not an independent predictor of BCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":17819,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Urology","volume":"56 8","pages":"565-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4111/kju.2015.56.8.565","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2015.56.8.565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical features and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer (PCa) with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN).

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 893 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy for PCa between 2011 and 2012 at Asan Medical Center; 752 of these patients who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy and were followed up for more than 1 year were included. The cohort was divided into two groups-patients with and without HGPIN-and their characteristics were compared. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze factors affecting BCR.

Results: In total, 652 study patients (86.7%) had HGPIN. There were no significant differences in preoperative factors between the two groups, including age (p=0.369) and preoperative prostate-specific antigen concentration (p=0.234). Patients with HGPIN had a higher Gleason score (p=0.012), more frequent multiple tumor (p=0.013), and more perineural invasion (p=0.012), but no other postoperative pathologic characteristics were significantly different between the two groups. There were no significant differences in BCR (13.0% vs. 11.5%, p=0.665) and HGPIN was not associated with BCR (p=0.745). In multivariate analysis, only the T stage (p<0.001) was associated with BCR.

Conclusions: PCa patients with HGPIN have a higher Gleason score, more frequent multiple tumors, and more perineural invasion than those without HGPIN. The presence of HGPIN is not an independent predictor of BCR.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前列腺癌伴高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变的临床特征及预后。
目的:探讨前列腺癌(PCa)合并高级别前列腺上皮内瘤变(HGPIN)的临床特征及生化复发(BCR)。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析了2011年至2012年在牙山医疗中心接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌的893例患者的医疗记录;其中752例患者未接受新辅助或辅助治疗,且随访1年以上。将该队列分为两组:有hgpin和没有hgpin的患者,并比较他们的特征。采用Cox比例风险模型分析影响BCR的因素。结果:652例患者(86.7%)有HGPIN。两组术前因素年龄(p=0.369)、术前前列腺特异性抗原浓度(p=0.234)差异无统计学意义。HGPIN患者Gleason评分较高(p=0.012),多发肿瘤发生率较高(p=0.013),神经周围侵犯发生率较高(p=0.012),但两组术后其他病理特征无显著差异。两组间BCR差异无统计学意义(13.0% vs. 11.5%, p=0.665), HGPIN与BCR无相关性(p=0.745)。结论:与不含HGPIN的PCa患者相比,HGPIN患者Gleason评分更高,多发肿瘤发生率更高,神经周围侵袭程度更高。HGPIN的存在并不是BCR的独立预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor: Impact of metabolic syndrome on response to medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia The authors reply: Impact of metabolic syndrome on response to medical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia Semen parameters from 2002 to 2013 in Korea young population: A preliminary report Simultaneous treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse and stress urinary incontinence by using transobturator four arms polypropylene mesh Influence of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition on simple renal cysts in patients receiving bevacizumab-based chemotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1