Visual opsins: Physiological alteration promoted by led light

María M. Benedetto , Manuel G. Bruera , Gonzalo G. Guendulain , María A. Contín
{"title":"Visual opsins: Physiological alteration promoted by led light","authors":"María M. Benedetto ,&nbsp;Manuel G. Bruera ,&nbsp;Gonzalo G. Guendulain ,&nbsp;María A. Contín","doi":"10.1016/j.jpap.2023.100163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rods are the most sensitive cells to light present in the retina, being therefore responsible for dim light vision. Light photons captured by the retina stimulate rhodopsin, promoting phototransduction mechanisms that end up sending the information to the brain. However, overexposure to light and continuous receptor stimulation may promote retinal damage. Thus, artificial light might have harmful effects on the retina, most particularly in rods. Light‐emitting diodes (LEDs) are nowadays the most used devices, and therefore their potential damage to the visual system should be evaluated and considered as a potential environmental factor in retinal degeneration. Particularly in Wistar rats, tonic receptors stimulation under constant light exposure (LL) produces retinal remodeling, inducing classical photoreceptors death and a re-location of non-classical opsins.</p><p>This work aims to show the effects of LED devices on rat retinas under intermittent stimulation. Wistar rats were exposed to white LED under 12:12 light/dark cycles for seven days (LD) to finally analyze the number of photoreceptors nuclei, electroretinograms (ERGs) activity, and glial activation. Our findings demonstrate that animals exposed to LED devices, even when they have intermittent periods of rest in darkness, present early retinal injury after seven days, compared with animals maintained in housing conditions (LDR) or darkness (DD). Altogether, these results suggest that extended LD conditions might induce retinal damage as constant light exposure (LL) does.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100163"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2610,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666469023000040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rods are the most sensitive cells to light present in the retina, being therefore responsible for dim light vision. Light photons captured by the retina stimulate rhodopsin, promoting phototransduction mechanisms that end up sending the information to the brain. However, overexposure to light and continuous receptor stimulation may promote retinal damage. Thus, artificial light might have harmful effects on the retina, most particularly in rods. Light‐emitting diodes (LEDs) are nowadays the most used devices, and therefore their potential damage to the visual system should be evaluated and considered as a potential environmental factor in retinal degeneration. Particularly in Wistar rats, tonic receptors stimulation under constant light exposure (LL) produces retinal remodeling, inducing classical photoreceptors death and a re-location of non-classical opsins.

This work aims to show the effects of LED devices on rat retinas under intermittent stimulation. Wistar rats were exposed to white LED under 12:12 light/dark cycles for seven days (LD) to finally analyze the number of photoreceptors nuclei, electroretinograms (ERGs) activity, and glial activation. Our findings demonstrate that animals exposed to LED devices, even when they have intermittent periods of rest in darkness, present early retinal injury after seven days, compared with animals maintained in housing conditions (LDR) or darkness (DD). Altogether, these results suggest that extended LD conditions might induce retinal damage as constant light exposure (LL) does.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视蛋白:由led光引起的生理改变
视杆细胞是视网膜中对光最敏感的细胞,因此负责昏暗的视觉。被视网膜捕获的光子刺激视紫红质,促进光传导机制,最终将信息发送到大脑。然而,过度暴露于光和持续的受体刺激可能会促进视网膜损伤。因此,人造光可能对视网膜,尤其是视杆细胞有有害的影响。发光二极管(led)是目前使用最多的设备,因此它们对视觉系统的潜在损害应该被评估并视为视网膜变性的潜在环境因素。特别是在Wistar大鼠中,持续光暴露(LL)下的强直受体刺激产生视网膜重塑,诱导经典光感受器死亡和非经典视蛋白的重新定位。这项工作旨在展示LED设备在间歇性刺激下对大鼠视网膜的影响。Wistar大鼠在12:12光/暗循环下暴露于白光LED下7天(LD),最后分析光感受器核数、视网膜电图(ERGs)活性和胶质细胞激活情况。我们的研究结果表明,与保持在住房条件(LDR)或黑暗(DD)中的动物相比,暴露于LED设备的动物,即使在黑暗中间歇性休息,也会在7天后出现早期视网膜损伤。总之,这些结果表明,延长的LD条件可能会引起视网膜损伤,就像持续光暴露(LL)一样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An interplay of light and temperature: Vitamin D3 formation in vitro, a model for in vivo plant studies Strategies for overcoming the lung surfactant barrier and achieving success in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy In vivo measurement of nitric oxide release from intact human skin post photobiomodulation using visible and near-infrared light: A chemiluminescence detection study Adaption of in vitro and in chemico phototoxicity tests for tattoo pigments and the effect of adsorption of the phototoxic contaminant benzo[a]pyrene to carbon black Dedicated to Professor Kazuhiko Mizuno on the occasion of his 75th birthday celebration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1