Preparation for teacher collaboration in inclusive classrooms - stress reduction for special education students via acceptance and commitment training: A controlled study.

Journal of molecular psychiatry Pub Date : 2015-09-28 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40303-015-0015-3
Simone Pülschen, Dietrich Pülschen
{"title":"Preparation for teacher collaboration in inclusive classrooms - stress reduction for special education students via acceptance and commitment training: A controlled study.","authors":"Simone Pülschen,&nbsp;Dietrich Pülschen","doi":"10.1186/s40303-015-0015-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The education system in Germany is beginning to witness a sea change, lately, owing to the country's ratification of the United Nation's Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The enactment is aiming at making provision for special education teachers to share the same teaching platform and institution with other teachers for teaching children from all backgrounds, irrespective of their needs. While promoting the benefits of collaborative teaching, this provision would also effectively establish role demarcation among teachers. However, the level of participation and adaptiveness displayed by individual teachers would play a major role in determining the success or failure of the intended collaborative framework. Collaboration also becomes challenging due to the level of stress involved in the teaching profession. The fact that only 65 % of teachers in Germany reach retirement age while still in service, primarily due to psychiatric illness, has posed questions on adopting the collaborative framework for teachers from diverse backgrounds. In other words, it can be stated that the process of collaborating with teachers from different professional backgrounds and with varying levels of skills will potentially lead to further stress. The stress-related psychological states, developed through the collaborative processes, might affect the biological stress-response systems of the participating teachers. With stress-response contributing directly to the pathogenesis of stress-related diseases and disorders in the long term, it would be important to contain the ripple effect of collaborative framework that the enactment intends to establish between SEN (special educational needs) teachers and others.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In addition to impacting the long-term health of teachers, the collaborative framework is also suggestive of having similar effects on students studying special education (SEN students). A study was conducted to examine the stress levels associated with the collaborative framework. An expression in terms of two (group affiliation) × 2 (measurement time) between subjects design was implemented to examine the effects of an Acceptance and Commitment Training on the subjective tension of a sample (N = 68) of SEN students. The sample was split into an intervention and a control group (IG and CG). The effects of the training on collaborative competence were examined using the Chi-square test. Questionnaire and role plays were used to assess the collaborative competence and the subjective tension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants had significant stress levels and displayed an uncooperative attitude during the initial assessment. However, these results reversed after the Acceptance and Commitment Training. Significant decrease in stress levels and improved cooperation were evident among the participants in the intervention group, as opposed to the participants of the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study show that the Acceptance and Commitment Training is an appropriate medium to establish and develop collaboration skills, and an effective technique to reduce high levels of subjective stress. Furthermore, the training evaluation and feedback indicate that it is well-accepted by all participants. The training is also endorsed as a practically relevant medium to help SEN students collaborate and combat stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":73838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of molecular psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40303-015-0015-3","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of molecular psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40303-015-0015-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: The education system in Germany is beginning to witness a sea change, lately, owing to the country's ratification of the United Nation's Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The enactment is aiming at making provision for special education teachers to share the same teaching platform and institution with other teachers for teaching children from all backgrounds, irrespective of their needs. While promoting the benefits of collaborative teaching, this provision would also effectively establish role demarcation among teachers. However, the level of participation and adaptiveness displayed by individual teachers would play a major role in determining the success or failure of the intended collaborative framework. Collaboration also becomes challenging due to the level of stress involved in the teaching profession. The fact that only 65 % of teachers in Germany reach retirement age while still in service, primarily due to psychiatric illness, has posed questions on adopting the collaborative framework for teachers from diverse backgrounds. In other words, it can be stated that the process of collaborating with teachers from different professional backgrounds and with varying levels of skills will potentially lead to further stress. The stress-related psychological states, developed through the collaborative processes, might affect the biological stress-response systems of the participating teachers. With stress-response contributing directly to the pathogenesis of stress-related diseases and disorders in the long term, it would be important to contain the ripple effect of collaborative framework that the enactment intends to establish between SEN (special educational needs) teachers and others.

Methods: In addition to impacting the long-term health of teachers, the collaborative framework is also suggestive of having similar effects on students studying special education (SEN students). A study was conducted to examine the stress levels associated with the collaborative framework. An expression in terms of two (group affiliation) × 2 (measurement time) between subjects design was implemented to examine the effects of an Acceptance and Commitment Training on the subjective tension of a sample (N = 68) of SEN students. The sample was split into an intervention and a control group (IG and CG). The effects of the training on collaborative competence were examined using the Chi-square test. Questionnaire and role plays were used to assess the collaborative competence and the subjective tension.

Results: The participants had significant stress levels and displayed an uncooperative attitude during the initial assessment. However, these results reversed after the Acceptance and Commitment Training. Significant decrease in stress levels and improved cooperation were evident among the participants in the intervention group, as opposed to the participants of the control group.

Conclusions: The findings of this study show that the Acceptance and Commitment Training is an appropriate medium to establish and develop collaboration skills, and an effective technique to reduce high levels of subjective stress. Furthermore, the training evaluation and feedback indicate that it is well-accepted by all participants. The training is also endorsed as a practically relevant medium to help SEN students collaborate and combat stress.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为全纳课堂教师合作做准备——通过接受与承诺训练减轻特殊教育学生的压力:一项对照研究。
背景:最近,由于德国批准了联合国《残疾人权利公约》,德国的教育体系开始发生翻天覆地的变化。该立法旨在为特殊教育教师提供与其他教师共享同一教学平台和机构的条件,以教授来自不同背景的儿童,而不考虑他们的需要。在促进合作教学效益的同时,这一规定也将有效地建立教师之间的角色划分。然而,个别教师的参与水平和适应能力将在决定预期合作框架的成败方面发挥重要作用。由于教学专业所涉及的压力水平,协作也变得具有挑战性。事实上,德国只有65%的教师达到退休年龄,但仍在工作,主要是由于精神疾病,这对采用不同背景的教师合作框架提出了问题。换句话说,可以说,与来自不同专业背景和不同技能水平的教师合作的过程可能会导致进一步的压力。通过协作过程形成的压力相关心理状态可能影响参与教师的生物压力反应系统。由于压力反应在长期内直接促成与压力有关的疾病和失调的发病机制,因此,必须遏制该法令打算在特殊教育需要教师和其他人员之间建立的合作框架的连锁反应。方法:除了影响教师的长期健康外,协作框架对特殊教育学生的学习也有类似的影响。进行了一项研究,以检查与协作框架相关的压力水平。采用2(群体隶属关系)× 2(测量时间)的被试设计来检验接受和承诺训练对样本(N = 68) SEN学生主观张力的影响。将样本分为干预组和对照组(IG组和CG组)。采用卡方检验检验训练对合作能力的影响。采用问卷调查法和角色扮演法对合作能力和主观张力进行评估。结果:被试在初始评估中表现出明显的压力水平和不合作态度。然而,这些结果在接受和承诺训练后发生了逆转。与对照组的参与者相比,干预组参与者的压力水平明显下降,合作能力明显提高。结论:本研究结果表明,接受与承诺训练是建立和发展协作技能的适当媒介,也是降低高水平主观压力的有效方法。此外,培训评估和反馈表明,所有参与者都接受了培训。培训也被认可为一种实际相关的媒介,以帮助特殊教育学生合作和对抗压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unified theory of Alzheimer's disease (UTAD): implications for prevention and curative therapy. αT-catenin in restricted brain cell types and its potential connection to autism. De novo POGZ mutations in sporadic autism disrupt the DNA-binding activity of POGZ. Prevalence of mental distress and associated factors among caregivers of patients with severe mental illness in the outpatient unit of Amanuel Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2013: Cross-sectional study. Preparation for teacher collaboration in inclusive classrooms - stress reduction for special education students via acceptance and commitment training: A controlled study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1