Particle Size Distribution in Aluminum Manufacturing Facilities.

Environment and pollution (Toronto, Ont.) Pub Date : 2014-10-01 Epub Date: 2014-09-24 DOI:10.5539/ep.v3n4p79
Sa Liu, Elizabeth M Noth, Christine Dixon-Ernst, Ellen A Eisen, Mark R Cullen, S Katharine Hammond
{"title":"Particle Size Distribution in Aluminum Manufacturing Facilities.","authors":"Sa Liu, Elizabeth M Noth, Christine Dixon-Ernst, Ellen A Eisen, Mark R Cullen, S Katharine Hammond","doi":"10.5539/ep.v3n4p79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As part of exposure assessment for an ongoing epidemiologic study of heart disease and fine particle exposures in aluminum industry, area particle samples were collected in production facilities to assess instrument reliability and particle size distribution at different process areas. Personal modular impactors (PMI) and Minimicro-orifice uniform deposition impactors (MiniMOUDI) were used. The coefficient of variation (CV) of co-located samples was used to evaluate the reproducibility of the samplers. PM<sub>2.5</sub> measured by PMI was compared to PM<sub>2.5</sub> calculated from MiniMOUDI data. Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and concentrations of sub-micrometer (PM<sub>1.0</sub>) and quasi-ultrafine (PM<sub>0.56)</sub> particles were evaluated to characterize particle size distribution. Most of CVs were less than 30%. The slope of the linear regression of PMI_PM<sub>2.5</sub> versus MiniMOUDI_PM<sub>2.5</sub> was 1.03 mg/m<sup>3</sup> per mg/m<sup>3</sup> (± 0.05), with correlation coefficient of 0.97 (± 0.01). Particle size distribution varied substantively in smelters, whereas it was less variable in fabrication units with significantly smaller MMADs (arithmetic mean of MMADs: 2.59 μm in smelters vs. 1.31 μm in fabrication units, p = 0.001). Although the total particle concentration was more than two times higher in the smelters than in the fabrication units, the fraction of PM<sub>10</sub> which was PM<sub>1.0</sub> or PM<sub>0.56</sub> was significantly lower in the smelters than in the fabrication units (p < 0.001). Consequently, the concentrations of sub-micrometer and quasi-ultrafine particles were similar in these two types of facilities. It would appear, studies evaluating ultrafine particle exposure in aluminum industry should focus on not only the smelters, but also the fabrication facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":91076,"journal":{"name":"Environment and pollution (Toronto, Ont.)","volume":"3 4","pages":"79-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4607067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and pollution (Toronto, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/ep.v3n4p79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As part of exposure assessment for an ongoing epidemiologic study of heart disease and fine particle exposures in aluminum industry, area particle samples were collected in production facilities to assess instrument reliability and particle size distribution at different process areas. Personal modular impactors (PMI) and Minimicro-orifice uniform deposition impactors (MiniMOUDI) were used. The coefficient of variation (CV) of co-located samples was used to evaluate the reproducibility of the samplers. PM2.5 measured by PMI was compared to PM2.5 calculated from MiniMOUDI data. Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) and concentrations of sub-micrometer (PM1.0) and quasi-ultrafine (PM0.56) particles were evaluated to characterize particle size distribution. Most of CVs were less than 30%. The slope of the linear regression of PMI_PM2.5 versus MiniMOUDI_PM2.5 was 1.03 mg/m3 per mg/m3 (± 0.05), with correlation coefficient of 0.97 (± 0.01). Particle size distribution varied substantively in smelters, whereas it was less variable in fabrication units with significantly smaller MMADs (arithmetic mean of MMADs: 2.59 μm in smelters vs. 1.31 μm in fabrication units, p = 0.001). Although the total particle concentration was more than two times higher in the smelters than in the fabrication units, the fraction of PM10 which was PM1.0 or PM0.56 was significantly lower in the smelters than in the fabrication units (p < 0.001). Consequently, the concentrations of sub-micrometer and quasi-ultrafine particles were similar in these two types of facilities. It would appear, studies evaluating ultrafine particle exposure in aluminum industry should focus on not only the smelters, but also the fabrication facilities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铝制造设施中的粒度分布。
作为正在进行的心脏病和铝工业细颗粒物流行病学研究的暴露评估的一部分,在生产设施中收集了区域颗粒物样本,以评估不同加工区域的仪器可靠性和颗粒物粒度分布。使用了个人模块式冲击器(PMI)和微型微孔均匀沉积冲击器(MiniMOUDI)。使用同地采样的变异系数(CV)来评估采样器的再现性。PMI 测量的 PM2.5 与 MiniMOUDI 数据计算的 PM2.5 进行了比较。对亚微米(PM1.0)和准超细(PM0.56)颗粒的质量中值空气动力学直径(MMAD)和浓度进行了评估,以确定颗粒大小分布的特征。大多数 CV 值小于 30%。PMI_PM2.5 与 MiniMOUDI_PM2.5 的线性回归斜率为每毫克/立方米 1.03 毫克/立方米(± 0.05),相关系数为 0.97(± 0.01)。冶炼厂的粒度分布变化很大,而制造单位的粒度分布变化较小,MMAD 明显较小(MMAD 的算术平均值:冶炼厂为 2.59 μm vs. 制造单位为 1.31 μm,p = 0.001)。尽管冶炼厂的颗粒物总浓度比制造厂高出两倍多,但冶炼厂的 PM10 中 PM1.0 或 PM0.56 的比例明显低于制造厂(p < 0.001)。因此,在这两类设施中,亚微米和准超细粒子的浓度相似。由此看来,评估铝工业中超细粒子暴露的研究不仅应关注熔炼厂,还应关注加工厂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Particle Size Distribution in Aluminum Manufacturing Facilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1