Finding the right doctoral thesis - an innovative research fair for medical students.

GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung Pub Date : 2015-08-17 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma000971
Julius Steffen, Markus Grabbert, Tanja Pander, Maximilian Gradel, Lisa-Maria Köhler, Martin R Fischer, Philip von der Borch, Konstantinos Dimitriadis
{"title":"Finding the right doctoral thesis - an innovative research fair for medical students.","authors":"Julius Steffen,&nbsp;Markus Grabbert,&nbsp;Tanja Pander,&nbsp;Maximilian Gradel,&nbsp;Lisa-Maria Köhler,&nbsp;Martin R Fischer,&nbsp;Philip von der Borch,&nbsp;Konstantinos Dimitriadis","doi":"10.3205/zma000971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The importance of research, as promoted by the CanMEDS framework, is widely acknowledged. Many medical students in Germany work on a research project as part of their doctoral thesis whilst still going to medical school. However, a significant amount of projects are abandoned unfinished, which leads to substantial wastage of resources. One reason for this is an information deficit concerning undergraduate research projects.</p><p><strong>Project description: </strong>To counteract this, we introduced an annual event at LMU Munich called DoktaMed with more than 600 visitors each year. It combines medical convention and research fair including keynote lectures, workshops and poster sessions as well as an exhibition of research groups and institutes. DoktaMed is a peer-to-peer event organized by a team of 40 students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A needs analysis before its implementation underlined the information deficit as a possible cause for the high rate of abandoned projects. In the annual evaluation, visitors of DoktaMed rate the event with an average grade of 2.1 on a six-level Likert scale (n=558, SD=1.06, with \"1=very good\", \"6=poor\"). They stated to now feel better informed about the topic and regarded visiting DoktaMed as a worthwhile investment of time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Students are generally satisfied with the event and feel better informed after visiting DoktaMed. However, many students never visit DoktaMed for various reasons. A possible improvement would be to present a greater number of clinical studies in addition to the laboratory work that DoktaMed focuses on now.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evaluation after six years of DoktaMed is very promising. Visitors seem to be better informed. Nevertheless there is space for improvement in order to get more students and more faculty members involved. More studies are needed to assess long-term effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"32 3","pages":"Doc29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000971","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: The importance of research, as promoted by the CanMEDS framework, is widely acknowledged. Many medical students in Germany work on a research project as part of their doctoral thesis whilst still going to medical school. However, a significant amount of projects are abandoned unfinished, which leads to substantial wastage of resources. One reason for this is an information deficit concerning undergraduate research projects.

Project description: To counteract this, we introduced an annual event at LMU Munich called DoktaMed with more than 600 visitors each year. It combines medical convention and research fair including keynote lectures, workshops and poster sessions as well as an exhibition of research groups and institutes. DoktaMed is a peer-to-peer event organized by a team of 40 students.

Results: A needs analysis before its implementation underlined the information deficit as a possible cause for the high rate of abandoned projects. In the annual evaluation, visitors of DoktaMed rate the event with an average grade of 2.1 on a six-level Likert scale (n=558, SD=1.06, with "1=very good", "6=poor"). They stated to now feel better informed about the topic and regarded visiting DoktaMed as a worthwhile investment of time.

Discussion: Students are generally satisfied with the event and feel better informed after visiting DoktaMed. However, many students never visit DoktaMed for various reasons. A possible improvement would be to present a greater number of clinical studies in addition to the laboratory work that DoktaMed focuses on now.

Conclusion: Evaluation after six years of DoktaMed is very promising. Visitors seem to be better informed. Nevertheless there is space for improvement in order to get more students and more faculty members involved. More studies are needed to assess long-term effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找合适的博士论文——为医科学生举办的创新研究博览会。
研究的重要性在CanMEDS框架下得到了广泛认可。在德国,许多医科学生在上医学院的同时,还在做一个研究项目,作为他们博士论文的一部分。然而,大量的项目没有完成就被放弃了,这导致了大量的资源浪费。造成这种情况的一个原因是有关本科生研究项目的信息不足。项目描述:为了解决这个问题,我们在慕尼黑大学引入了一个名为DoktaMed的年度活动,每年有600多名参观者。它结合了医学会议和研究博览会,包括主题演讲、研讨会和海报会议,以及研究小组和研究所的展览。DoktaMed是一个由40名学生组成的团队组织的点对点活动。结果:实施前的需求分析强调了信息缺失是导致项目废弃率高的可能原因。在年度评价中,doktamamed的游客在6级李克特量表(n=558, SD=1.06,“1=很好”,“6=差”)中对该活动的平均评分为2.1分。他们表示,现在对这个话题有了更好的了解,并认为参观doktamamed是一项值得的时间投资。讨论:学生们普遍对活动感到满意,并在参观了DoktaMed后感到更加了解。然而,由于各种原因,许多学生从未访问过DoktaMed。一个可能的改进是,除了doktamamed目前关注的实验室工作外,还将提供更多的临床研究。结论:经6年的临床评价,疗效良好。游客似乎更了解情况。然而,为了让更多的学生和教师参与进来,还有改进的空间。需要更多的研究来评估长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
8th meeting of the medical assessment consortium UCAN: "Collaborative Perspectives for Competency-based and Quality-assured Medical Assessment". Influence of a revision course and the gender of examiners on the grades of the final ENT exam--a retrospective review of 3961 exams. The Final Oral/Practical State Examination at Freiburg Medical Faculty in 2012--Analysis of grading to test quality assurance. The new final Clinical Skills examination in human medicine in Switzerland: Essential steps of exam development, implementation and evaluation, and central insights from the perspective of the national Working Group. Electronic acquisition of OSCE performance using tablets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1