Cytoreductive surgery (SRC) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: Our initial experience and technical details.

Ulusal cerrahi dergisi Pub Date : 2015-09-01 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.5152/UCD.2015.2990
Koray Topgül, Mehmet Bilge Çetinkaya, N Çiğdem Arslan, Mustafa Kemal Gül, Murat Çan, Mahmut Fikret Gürsel, Dilek Erdem, Zafer Malazgirt
{"title":"Cytoreductive surgery (SRC) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: Our initial experience and technical details.","authors":"Koray Topgül, Mehmet Bilge Çetinkaya, N Çiğdem Arslan, Mustafa Kemal Gül, Murat Çan, Mahmut Fikret Gürsel, Dilek Erdem, Zafer Malazgirt","doi":"10.5152/UCD.2015.2990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to present our initial experience in peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment and the technical details of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the light of current literature.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of 27 consecutive patients who were treated with CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis in Medical Park Samsun Hospital, between November 2012 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment indication and management were evaluated at the multidisciplinary oncology council. All patients underwent CRS and HIPEC with the aim of complete cytoreduction. Patients with unresectable disease and/or palliative surgery were excluded from analysis. Perioperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo classification, and HIPEC-related side effects were identified using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria. Demographic, clinical and histopathological data of the patients were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 54 (32-72). Nineteen patients were female. The origin of peritoneal carcinomatosis was colorectal cancer in 12 patients, ovarian cancer in 12 patients, gastric cancer in 2 patients and pseudomyxoma peritonei in 1 patient. The mean Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index was 12 (3-32), with a mean operative time of 420 (300-660) minutes. Perioperative morbidity, HIPEC-related toxicity and perioperative mortality were observed in eight (30%), one (3.7%) and four patients (14.8%), respectively. During a mean follow up of 13 (1-22) months, overall and disease-free survival rates were 95.8% and 82.6%, respectively. Two patients with colorectal cancer (after 9 and 12 months) and one patient with ovarian cancer (after 11 months) had intra-abdominal recurrence. One patient with ovarian cancer had liver metastases 13 months after surgery, and underwent resection of segments 6-7. The remaining patients are being followed-up without any recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC have favorable results in the treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Compatible with the literature, surgical outcomes of the presented series are encouraging for this treatment modality that have been recently popularized in our country. Careful perioperative evaluation, proper patient selection and multidisciplinary approach are essential for success in curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":90992,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","volume":"31 3","pages":"138-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4605109/pdf/ucd-31-3-138.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/UCD.2015.2990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to present our initial experience in peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment and the technical details of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the light of current literature.

Material and methods: Data of 27 consecutive patients who were treated with CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis in Medical Park Samsun Hospital, between November 2012 and September 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment indication and management were evaluated at the multidisciplinary oncology council. All patients underwent CRS and HIPEC with the aim of complete cytoreduction. Patients with unresectable disease and/or palliative surgery were excluded from analysis. Perioperative complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo classification, and HIPEC-related side effects were identified using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria. Demographic, clinical and histopathological data of the patients were analyzed.

Results: The mean age was 54 (32-72). Nineteen patients were female. The origin of peritoneal carcinomatosis was colorectal cancer in 12 patients, ovarian cancer in 12 patients, gastric cancer in 2 patients and pseudomyxoma peritonei in 1 patient. The mean Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index was 12 (3-32), with a mean operative time of 420 (300-660) minutes. Perioperative morbidity, HIPEC-related toxicity and perioperative mortality were observed in eight (30%), one (3.7%) and four patients (14.8%), respectively. During a mean follow up of 13 (1-22) months, overall and disease-free survival rates were 95.8% and 82.6%, respectively. Two patients with colorectal cancer (after 9 and 12 months) and one patient with ovarian cancer (after 11 months) had intra-abdominal recurrence. One patient with ovarian cancer had liver metastases 13 months after surgery, and underwent resection of segments 6-7. The remaining patients are being followed-up without any recurrence.

Conclusion: Cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC have favorable results in the treatment of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Compatible with the literature, surgical outcomes of the presented series are encouraging for this treatment modality that have been recently popularized in our country. Careful perioperative evaluation, proper patient selection and multidisciplinary approach are essential for success in curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗腹膜癌肿的清创手术(SRC)和腹腔内热化疗(HIPEC):我们的初步经验和技术细节。
研究目的本研究旨在根据现有文献,介绍我们在腹膜癌治疗方面的初步经验,以及细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔内热化疗(HIPEC)的技术细节:回顾性分析2012年11月至2014年9月期间在Medical Park Samsun医院接受CRS和HIPEC治疗的27例腹膜癌患者的数据。多学科肿瘤委员会对治疗指征和管理进行了评估。所有患者均接受了CRS和HIPEC治疗,目的是彻底清除细胞。无法切除的疾病和/或姑息手术患者不在分析之列。围手术期并发症根据克拉维恩-丁多(Clavien-Dindo)分类法进行分类,与HIPEC相关的副作用则根据美国国家癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)进行鉴定。对患者的人口统计学、临床和组织病理学数据进行了分析:平均年龄为 54 岁(32-72 岁)。19名患者为女性。12名患者的腹膜癌起源于结直肠癌,12名患者的起源于卵巢癌,2名患者的起源于胃癌,1名患者的起源于假性腹膜肌瘤。平均腹膜癌变指数为 12(3-32),平均手术时间为 420(300-660)分钟。围手术期发病率、HIPEC相关毒性和围手术期死亡率分别为8例(30%)、1例(3.7%)和4例(14.8%)。在平均 13(1-22)个月的随访期间,总生存率和无病生存率分别为 95.8% 和 82.6%。两名结直肠癌患者(9 个月和 12 个月后)和一名卵巢癌患者(11 个月后)出现腹腔内复发。一名卵巢癌患者在术后 13 个月出现肝转移,接受了第 6-7 节段切除术。其余患者正在接受随访,未见复发:结论:对腹膜癌肿患者进行清创手术和腹腔镜下腹膜切除术治疗效果良好。与文献报道一致,本文所介绍的系列手术结果对于这种最近在我国推广的治疗方式来说是令人鼓舞的。仔细的围手术期评估、适当的患者选择和多学科方法是成功治愈腹膜癌的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Circulating tumor DNA for monitoring colorectal cancer: A prospective observational study to assess the presence of methylated SEPT9 and VIM promoter genes and its role as a biomarker in colorectal cancer management. Synchronous pancreas and gallbladder cancer with concomitant alopecia totalis. The effects of the use of hyoscine-N-butylbromide during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A retrospective study of diagnosis and management of gallbladder perforation: 10-year experience from a tertiary health care centre. Surgery versus no surgery in stage IV gallbladder carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1