A retrospective study of diagnosis and management of gallbladder perforation: 10-year experience from a tertiary health care centre.

Ulusal cerrahi dergisi Pub Date : 2023-06-19 eCollection Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.5962
Ab Hamid Wani, Javid Iqbal, Satish Parihar
{"title":"A retrospective study of diagnosis and management of gallbladder perforation: 10-year experience from a tertiary health care centre.","authors":"Ab Hamid Wani, Javid Iqbal, Satish Parihar","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.5962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to perform retrospective analysis of data collected from patients of gallbladder perforations for diagnosis, management and outcome.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of data was carried out for 40 patients of gallbladder perforations from the hospital record of patients who were diagnosed preoperatively and intraoperatively as a case of gallbladder perforation over a period of 10 years and were managed in our surgery unit of a tertiary health care centre. Patients were included irrespective of sex except cases of trauma and patients of the paediatric age group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 40 patients, 26 were females and 14 were males. As per Anderson modification of Neimeier classification, 13 (32.5%) had type 1, 23 (57.5%) had type 2, and four (10%) patients had type 3 perforations and none of the patients had type 4 perforation. Twenty-three patients (57.5%) were found to have fundal perforation, followed by body in 11 patients (27.5%), three (7.5%) in Hartman's pouch while in three patients (7.5%), there were multiple perforations. All patients of type 1 Neimer classification were diagnosed clinically as cases of biliary peritonitis, whereas most cases of type 2 Neimer classification were diagnosed preoperatively by CECT abdomen 12/23 patients (52%) and ultrasound abdomen 10/23 (43.47%). All patients underwent surgery, and there were three mortalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, there was female predominance in patients having gallbladder perforation. Of the patients, 52.5% were diabetic and mean age was 55.9 years. CECT abdomen was the most useful modality for diagnosis of type 2 gallbladder perforations. Timely surgical intervention is mandatory for a better outcome of these cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":90992,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","volume":" ","pages":"102-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal cerrahi dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.5962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to perform retrospective analysis of data collected from patients of gallbladder perforations for diagnosis, management and outcome.

Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of data was carried out for 40 patients of gallbladder perforations from the hospital record of patients who were diagnosed preoperatively and intraoperatively as a case of gallbladder perforation over a period of 10 years and were managed in our surgery unit of a tertiary health care centre. Patients were included irrespective of sex except cases of trauma and patients of the paediatric age group.

Results: Among 40 patients, 26 were females and 14 were males. As per Anderson modification of Neimeier classification, 13 (32.5%) had type 1, 23 (57.5%) had type 2, and four (10%) patients had type 3 perforations and none of the patients had type 4 perforation. Twenty-three patients (57.5%) were found to have fundal perforation, followed by body in 11 patients (27.5%), three (7.5%) in Hartman's pouch while in three patients (7.5%), there were multiple perforations. All patients of type 1 Neimer classification were diagnosed clinically as cases of biliary peritonitis, whereas most cases of type 2 Neimer classification were diagnosed preoperatively by CECT abdomen 12/23 patients (52%) and ultrasound abdomen 10/23 (43.47%). All patients underwent surgery, and there were three mortalities.

Conclusion: In our study, there was female predominance in patients having gallbladder perforation. Of the patients, 52.5% were diabetic and mean age was 55.9 years. CECT abdomen was the most useful modality for diagnosis of type 2 gallbladder perforations. Timely surgical intervention is mandatory for a better outcome of these cases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
回顾性研究胆囊穿孔的诊断和管理:10年经验,从三级卫生保健中心
目的:本研究旨在回顾性分析胆囊穿孔患者的诊断、治疗和预后。材料和方法:回顾性分析了40例胆囊穿孔患者的资料,这些患者在术前和术中被诊断为胆囊穿孔,在我们三级卫生保健中心的外科部门进行了10年的住院记录。除创伤病例和儿童年龄组患者外,患者不分性别。结果:40例患者中,女性26例,男性14例。根据Anderson修改的Neimeier分类,1型穿孔13例(32.5%),2型穿孔23例(57.5%),3型穿孔4例(10%),4型穿孔无一例。其中,23例(57.5%)为眼底穿孔,11例(27.5%)为身体穿孔,3例(7.5%)为哈特曼眼袋穿孔,3例(7.5%)为多处穿孔。1型Neimer分型患者临床诊断均为胆道性腹膜炎,2型Neimer分型患者术前以CECT腹部12/23(52%)和腹部超声10/23(43.47%)诊断最多。所有患者均接受手术治疗,其中3例死亡。结论:在我们的研究中,胆囊穿孔患者以女性为主。其中52.5%为糖尿病患者,平均年龄55.9岁。腹部CECT是诊断2型胆囊穿孔最有用的方式。及时的手术干预是必要的,以获得更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Circulating tumor DNA for monitoring colorectal cancer: A prospective observational study to assess the presence of methylated SEPT9 and VIM promoter genes and its role as a biomarker in colorectal cancer management. Synchronous pancreas and gallbladder cancer with concomitant alopecia totalis. The effects of the use of hyoscine-N-butylbromide during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. A retrospective study of diagnosis and management of gallbladder perforation: 10-year experience from a tertiary health care centre. Surgery versus no surgery in stage IV gallbladder carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1