[Efficacy and tolerability of topiramate, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam in children with refractory epilepsy].

Q4 Medicine No To Hattatsu Pub Date : 2015-09-01
Takeo Kato, Masatoshi Nakata, Minako Ide, Keiko Saito, Takeshi Yoshida, Tomonari Awaya, Toshio Heike
{"title":"[Efficacy and tolerability of topiramate, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam in children with refractory epilepsy].","authors":"Takeo Kato,&nbsp;Masatoshi Nakata,&nbsp;Minako Ide,&nbsp;Keiko Saito,&nbsp;Takeshi Yoshida,&nbsp;Tomonari Awaya,&nbsp;Toshio Heike","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Topiramate (TPM), lamotrigine (LTG), and levetiracetam (LEV) are three new-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) which have recently come into use in add-on therapy for refractory childhood epilepsy in Japan. The aim of this study was to evaluate their efficacy and tolerability, and to clarify the role of these three AEDs in childhood epilepsy therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three separate audits were conducted between July 2007 and July 2012. All patients studied had epilepsy refractory to other AEDs. Efficacy was confirmed if a patient became seizure-free or achieved > 50% reduction (50% responder rate: 50% RR) in seizure frequency for 12 months after starting add-on therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 55 children received TPM, 44 LTG, and 38 LEV. The 50% RR of partial epilepsy was 31.8% for LTG, 41.8% for TPM, and 52.6% for LEV. The 50% RR of generalized epilepsy was 28.6% for LTG, 26.7% for TPM, and 44.4% for LEV. The incidence of adverse events was 9.1% for LTG, 43.6% for TPM, and 15.8% for LEV.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LEV was the most effective of the three add-on therapies in refractory childhood epilepsy with partial and generalized onset. Regarding seizure-free, TPM was more effective than the other therapies, but it had many side effects. LTG tended to be more effective for generalized epilepsy, particularly idiopathic epilepsy, than partial epilepsy. We conclude that it is necessary to develop a treatment plan for pediatric epilepsies after considering the advantages and disadvantage of these new AEDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":39367,"journal":{"name":"No To Hattatsu","volume":"47 5","pages":"354-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"No To Hattatsu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Topiramate (TPM), lamotrigine (LTG), and levetiracetam (LEV) are three new-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) which have recently come into use in add-on therapy for refractory childhood epilepsy in Japan. The aim of this study was to evaluate their efficacy and tolerability, and to clarify the role of these three AEDs in childhood epilepsy therapy.

Methods: Three separate audits were conducted between July 2007 and July 2012. All patients studied had epilepsy refractory to other AEDs. Efficacy was confirmed if a patient became seizure-free or achieved > 50% reduction (50% responder rate: 50% RR) in seizure frequency for 12 months after starting add-on therapy.

Results: A total of 55 children received TPM, 44 LTG, and 38 LEV. The 50% RR of partial epilepsy was 31.8% for LTG, 41.8% for TPM, and 52.6% for LEV. The 50% RR of generalized epilepsy was 28.6% for LTG, 26.7% for TPM, and 44.4% for LEV. The incidence of adverse events was 9.1% for LTG, 43.6% for TPM, and 15.8% for LEV.

Conclusion: LEV was the most effective of the three add-on therapies in refractory childhood epilepsy with partial and generalized onset. Regarding seizure-free, TPM was more effective than the other therapies, but it had many side effects. LTG tended to be more effective for generalized epilepsy, particularly idiopathic epilepsy, than partial epilepsy. We conclude that it is necessary to develop a treatment plan for pediatric epilepsies after considering the advantages and disadvantage of these new AEDs.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[托吡酯、拉莫三嗪和左乙拉西坦治疗难治性癫痫的疗效和耐受性]。
目的:托吡酯(TPM)、拉莫三嗪(LTG)和左乙拉西坦(LEV)是最近在日本应用于难治性儿童癫痫附加治疗的三种新一代抗癫痫药物。本研究的目的是评价这三种抗癫痫药的疗效和耐受性,并阐明这三种抗癫痫药在儿童癫痫治疗中的作用。方法:2007年7月至2012年7月进行了三次独立审计。所有研究的患者都有其他抗癫痫药难治性癫痫。如果患者在开始附加治疗后12个月内无癫痫发作或癫痫发作频率减少> 50%(50%应答率:50% RR),则证实疗效。结果:TPM 55例,LTG 44例,LEV 38例。部分性癫痫50% RR分别为LTG组31.8%、TPM组41.8%、LEV组52.6%。全面性癫痫50% RR分别为:LTG组28.6%,TPM组26.7%,LEV组44.4%。不良事件发生率LTG组为9.1%,TPM组为43.6%,LEV组为15.8%。结论:LEV是三种附加疗法中治疗难治性儿童癫痫的最有效方法。在无癫痫发作方面,TPM比其他治疗方法更有效,但有许多副作用。LTG对全身性癫痫,特别是特发性癫痫比部分性癫痫更有效。我们认为,综合考虑这些新型抗癫痫药的优缺点,有必要制定儿童癫痫的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
No To Hattatsu
No To Hattatsu Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Historiae]. [Introductory remarks]. [Clinical characteristics of early juvenile GM2 gangliosidosis: a case report]. [Successful treatment with topiramate in a case of idiopathic intracranial hypertension refractory to acetazolamide]. [Ictal arterial spin labeling MRI findings in two cases of acute confusional migraine].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1