Tests detecting biomarkers for screening of colorectal cancer: What is on the horizon?

GMS health technology assessment Pub Date : 2015-06-10 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.3205/hta000122
Angaja Phalguni, Helen Seaman, Kristina Routh, Stephen Halloran, Sue Simpson
{"title":"Tests detecting biomarkers for screening of colorectal cancer: What is on the horizon?","authors":"Angaja Phalguni,&nbsp;Helen Seaman,&nbsp;Kristina Routh,&nbsp;Stephen Halloran,&nbsp;Sue Simpson","doi":"10.3205/hta000122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify new and emerging screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) that involves detection of various biomarkers like blood, DNA and RNA in samples of faeces, tissue or blood. Current practice: Screening for CRC can be done by bowel visualisation techniques and tests that measure biomarkers. The Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England uses a guaiac faecal occult blood test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The strategy was to search available literature, identify developers and contact them for relevant information. Advice from experts was sought on potential utility and likely impact of identified technologies on the BCSP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three companies and five research groups were contacted. Sixty-nine relevant tests were identified. Detailed information was available for 48 tests, of these 73% were CE marked and the remainder were considered as emerging. Forty-nine tests use immunochemical methods to detect occult blood in faeces. Eight, four and two tests detect biomarkers in a sample of blood, or exfoliated cells either shed in faeces or collected from rectal mucosa respectively. Six tests were grouped as 'other tests'. Most of the identified tests are performed manually and give qualitative detection of biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Variation in test performance and characteristics was observed amongst the 69 identified tests. Automated, quantitative FIT with a variable cut off are the preferred approach in the BSCP. However the units used to report FITs results do not enable comparison across products. Tests detecting biomarkers other than occult blood are more specific to neoplasms but have limited sensitivity due to the heterogeneity of cancer. Research is ongoing to identify an optimal panel of biomarkers, simplifying and automating the test, and reducing the cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"11 ","pages":"Doc01"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4466319/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/hta000122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aim: To identify new and emerging screening tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) that involves detection of various biomarkers like blood, DNA and RNA in samples of faeces, tissue or blood. Current practice: Screening for CRC can be done by bowel visualisation techniques and tests that measure biomarkers. The Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England uses a guaiac faecal occult blood test.

Methods: The strategy was to search available literature, identify developers and contact them for relevant information. Advice from experts was sought on potential utility and likely impact of identified technologies on the BCSP.

Results: Ninety-three companies and five research groups were contacted. Sixty-nine relevant tests were identified. Detailed information was available for 48 tests, of these 73% were CE marked and the remainder were considered as emerging. Forty-nine tests use immunochemical methods to detect occult blood in faeces. Eight, four and two tests detect biomarkers in a sample of blood, or exfoliated cells either shed in faeces or collected from rectal mucosa respectively. Six tests were grouped as 'other tests'. Most of the identified tests are performed manually and give qualitative detection of biomarkers.

Conclusion: Variation in test performance and characteristics was observed amongst the 69 identified tests. Automated, quantitative FIT with a variable cut off are the preferred approach in the BSCP. However the units used to report FITs results do not enable comparison across products. Tests detecting biomarkers other than occult blood are more specific to neoplasms but have limited sensitivity due to the heterogeneity of cancer. Research is ongoing to identify an optimal panel of biomarkers, simplifying and automating the test, and reducing the cost.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检测结直肠癌筛查生物标志物的测试:即将出现什么?
目的:确定新的和新兴的结肠直肠癌(CRC)筛查测试,包括检测粪便、组织或血液样本中的血液、DNA和RNA等各种生物标志物。目前的做法:CRC的筛查可以通过肠道可视化技术和测量生物标志物的测试来完成。英国的肠癌筛查项目(BCSP)使用愈创木粪便隐血测试。方法:检索现有文献,确定开发人员并联系他们获取相关信息。就已确定技术对BCSP的潜在效用和可能影响征求了专家的意见。结果:联系了93家企业和5个研究小组。确定了69项相关试验。48项测试的详细信息可获得,其中73%是CE标记,其余的被认为是新兴的。49项试验使用免疫化学方法检测粪便中的隐血。8、4和2种测试分别检测血液样本中的生物标志物,或从粪便中脱落或从直肠粘膜收集的脱落细胞。6项测试被归为“其他测试”。大多数已确定的测试都是手动执行的,并对生物标志物进行定性检测。结论:在69个鉴定的试验中观察到试验性能和特征的变化。在BSCP中,具有可变截止的自动化定量FIT是首选方法。然而,用于报告fit结果的单元不能实现跨产品的比较。检测除隐血以外的生物标志物的试验对肿瘤更有特异性,但由于癌症的异质性,敏感性有限。目前正在进行研究,以确定最佳的生物标志物面板,简化和自动化测试,并降低成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variability in the prescription of drugs with uncertain effectiveness. The case of SYSADOA in the Basque Country. Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments. Effects of continuous and intermittent renal replacement therapies among adult patients with acute kidney injury. Telemedicine: The legal framework (or the lack of it) in Europe. Complex health care interventions: Characteristics relevant for ethical analysis in health technology assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1