In Geol Ho, Jae Keun Kim, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Jae Young Kim, Joon Seong Park, Dong Sup Yoon
{"title":"Does international study group on pancreatic fistula (ISGPF) classification need modification after distal pancreatectomy?","authors":"In Geol Ho, Jae Keun Kim, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Jae Young Kim, Joon Seong Park, Dong Sup Yoon","doi":"10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.3.90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>Few reports have validated the clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (PF) after distal pancreatectomy. The study intended to validate the predictability for clinical PF of drain amylase and lipase and to find out more appropriate postoperative day (POD) for diagnostic criterion of PF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 154 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy. We used the clinical database registry system of the Gangnam Severance Hospital and Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System for these analyses. The receiver operating characteristic curve of the drain amylase or lipase concentration on each day was used to predict clinical PF (International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula [ISGPF] grade B or C) and areas under the curves (AUC) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Amylase and lipase AUC values poorly predicted clinical PF before POD 3 and, gradually increased until POD 5 and became well correlated with clinical PF (ISGPF grade B or C). In contrast, the prediction of clinical PF using drain lipase did not differ from that using drain amylase. The drain amylase concentration on POD 6 was most precisely correlated with clinical PF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical PF prediction was validated by using drain amylase and lipase concentrations, in which drain amylase assessment at POD 6 appeared to be an appropriate diagnostic criterion of PF after distal pancreatectomy. We suggest some modification of ISGPF definition, especially for distal pancreatectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":91136,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":"18 3","pages":"90-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.3.90","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.3.90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Backgrounds/aims: Few reports have validated the clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (PF) after distal pancreatectomy. The study intended to validate the predictability for clinical PF of drain amylase and lipase and to find out more appropriate postoperative day (POD) for diagnostic criterion of PF.
Methods: A total of 154 patients underwent distal pancreatectomy. We used the clinical database registry system of the Gangnam Severance Hospital and Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System for these analyses. The receiver operating characteristic curve of the drain amylase or lipase concentration on each day was used to predict clinical PF (International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula [ISGPF] grade B or C) and areas under the curves (AUC) were compared.
Results: Amylase and lipase AUC values poorly predicted clinical PF before POD 3 and, gradually increased until POD 5 and became well correlated with clinical PF (ISGPF grade B or C). In contrast, the prediction of clinical PF using drain lipase did not differ from that using drain amylase. The drain amylase concentration on POD 6 was most precisely correlated with clinical PF.
Conclusions: Clinical PF prediction was validated by using drain amylase and lipase concentrations, in which drain amylase assessment at POD 6 appeared to be an appropriate diagnostic criterion of PF after distal pancreatectomy. We suggest some modification of ISGPF definition, especially for distal pancreatectomy.
背景/目的:很少有报道证实远端胰腺切除术后临床胰瘘(PF)。本研究旨在验证引流淀粉酶和脂肪酶的临床PF的可预测性,并寻找更合适的术后天数(POD)作为PF的诊断标准。方法:154例患者行远端胰腺切除术。我们使用了江南Severance医院和延世大学保健系统Severance医院的临床数据库注册系统进行分析。每日胰管淀粉酶或脂肪酶浓度的受试者工作特征曲线用于预测临床PF (International Study Group on胰瘘[ISGPF]分级B级或C级),并比较曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:淀粉酶和脂肪酶AUC值在POD 3之前不能很好地预测临床PF,直到POD 5才逐渐升高,并与临床PF具有良好的相关性(ISGPF分级为B级或C级)。相反,使用引流脂肪酶和使用引流淀粉酶对临床PF的预测没有差异。结论:胰底6段引流淀粉酶和脂肪酶的浓度可用于临床PF的预测,其中胰底6段引流淀粉酶的评估可作为远端胰腺切除术后PF的诊断标准。我们建议修改ISGPF的定义,特别是对于远端胰腺切除术。