Comparison of oral dydrogesterone with vaginal progesteronefor luteal support in IUI cycles: a randomized clinical trial.

Donya Khosravi, Robabeh Taheripanah, Anahita Taheripanah, Vahid Tarighat Monfared, Seyed-Mostafa Hosseini-Zijoud
{"title":"Comparison of oral dydrogesterone with vaginal progesteronefor luteal support in IUI cycles: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Donya Khosravi,&nbsp;Robabeh Taheripanah,&nbsp;Anahita Taheripanah,&nbsp;Vahid Tarighat Monfared,&nbsp;Seyed-Mostafa Hosseini-Zijoud","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study, we have compared the advantages of oral dydrogestrone with vaginal progesterone (cyclogest) for luteal support in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. Progesterone supplementation is the first line treatment when luteal phase deficiency (LPD) can reasonably be assumed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conduct to compare the effect of oral dydrogestrone with vaginal Cyclogest on luteal phase support in the IUI cycles.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, double blind study was performed in a local infertility center from May 2013 to May 2014. It consisted of 150 infertile women younger than35years old undergoing ovarian stimulation for IUI cycles. They underwent ovarian stimulation with oral dydrogesterone (20 mg) as group A and vaginal cyclogest (400 mg) as group B in preparation for the IUI cycles. Clinical pregnancy and abortion rates, mid luteal progesterone (7daysafter IUI) and patient satisfaction were compared between two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean serum progesterone levels was significantly higher in group A in comparison with group B (p=0.001). Pregnancy rates in group A was not statistically different in comparison with group B (p =0.58). Abortion rate in two groups was not statistically different (p =0.056) although rate of abortion was higher in group B in comparison with A group. Satisfaction rates were significantly higher in group A compared to group B (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We concluded that oral dydrogestrone is effective as vaginal progesterone for luteal-phase support in woman undergoing IUI cycles. Moreover, the mean serum progesterone levels and satisfaction rates in dydrogestrone group were higher than cyclogest group.</p>","PeriodicalId":14673,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine","volume":"13 7","pages":"433-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4609323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study, we have compared the advantages of oral dydrogestrone with vaginal progesterone (cyclogest) for luteal support in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. Progesterone supplementation is the first line treatment when luteal phase deficiency (LPD) can reasonably be assumed.

Objective: This study was conduct to compare the effect of oral dydrogestrone with vaginal Cyclogest on luteal phase support in the IUI cycles.

Materials and methods: This prospective, randomized, double blind study was performed in a local infertility center from May 2013 to May 2014. It consisted of 150 infertile women younger than35years old undergoing ovarian stimulation for IUI cycles. They underwent ovarian stimulation with oral dydrogesterone (20 mg) as group A and vaginal cyclogest (400 mg) as group B in preparation for the IUI cycles. Clinical pregnancy and abortion rates, mid luteal progesterone (7daysafter IUI) and patient satisfaction were compared between two groups.

Results: The mean serum progesterone levels was significantly higher in group A in comparison with group B (p=0.001). Pregnancy rates in group A was not statistically different in comparison with group B (p =0.58). Abortion rate in two groups was not statistically different (p =0.056) although rate of abortion was higher in group B in comparison with A group. Satisfaction rates were significantly higher in group A compared to group B (p<0.001).

Conclusion: We concluded that oral dydrogestrone is effective as vaginal progesterone for luteal-phase support in woman undergoing IUI cycles. Moreover, the mean serum progesterone levels and satisfaction rates in dydrogestrone group were higher than cyclogest group.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服地屈孕酮与阴道孕酮在IUI周期中黄体支持的比较:一项随机临床试验。
背景:本研究的目的是比较口服地屈孕酮与阴道孕酮(环孕酮)在宫内人工授精(IUI)周期中黄体支持的优势。当黄体期缺乏(LPD)可以合理假设时,补充黄体酮是一线治疗。目的:比较口服地地孕酮与阴道环孕酮在人工授精周期中对黄体期支持的影响。材料与方法:该前瞻性、随机、双盲研究于2013年5月至2014年5月在当地一家不孕不育中心进行。该研究包括150名年龄在35岁以下的不孕妇女,她们在人工授精周期中接受卵巢刺激。A组口服地屈孕酮(20mg)刺激卵巢,B组口服阴道环孕酮(400mg)刺激卵巢,为人工授精周期做准备。比较两组临床妊娠率、流产率、中期黄体黄体酮(IUI后7d)及患者满意度。结果:A组平均血清孕酮水平显著高于B组(p=0.001)。A组与B组妊娠率比较,差异无统计学意义(p =0.58)。两组流产率差异无统计学意义(p =0.056),但B组流产率高于A组。结论:口服地地孕酮作为阴道黄体酮对宫内人工授精周期妇女黄体期的支持是有效的。地屈孕酮组的平均血清孕酮水平和满意率均高于环孕酮组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The status of depression and anxiety in infertile Turkish couples Vaginal compared oral administration of estradiol in women with thin endometrium: A cross-sectional study Corrigendum to “Interstitial ectopic pregnancy diagnosis by three-dimensional ultrasound and its laparoscopic management: A case report” [Int J Reprod BioMed 2019; 17: 945-950] A new strategy and system for the ex vivo ovary perfusion and cryopreservation: An innovation The etiologies of DNA abnormalities in male infertility: An assessment and review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1