[Rengalin, a New Efficacious and Safe Antitussive Agent. Results of a Randomized, Comparative, Multicenter Clinical Trial in Patients with Acute Respiratory Tract Infections].

Q4 Medicine Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiya Pub Date : 2015-01-01
A L Akopov, E B Aleksandrova, M M Il'kovich, D V Petrov, V I Trofimov
{"title":"[Rengalin, a New Efficacious and Safe Antitussive Agent. Results of a Randomized, Comparative, Multicenter Clinical Trial in Patients with Acute Respiratory Tract Infections].","authors":"A L Akopov,&nbsp;E B Aleksandrova,&nbsp;M M Il'kovich,&nbsp;D V Petrov,&nbsp;V I Trofimov","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Rengalin is a release-active combination antitussive drug based on antibodies to bradykinin, to histamine and morphine. It acts at various mechanisms of cough reflex by modifying endogenous target molecules and their interaction with receptors. The drug's efficacy, as demonstrated previously in experimental and clinical studies, is mediated by specific release-activity obtained as a result of the production process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Efficacy and safety assessment of rengalin in the treatment of cough induced by acute upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) in comparison with a complex codeine-containing drug (codelac) was performed as part of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 143 patients. All the participants presented with dry/non-productive cough caused by URIs (pharyngitis, laryngitis, tracheitis, tracheobronchitis, bronchitis). The duration of cough varied between 12 hours and 7 days. Rengalin was administered in 73 patients receiving 2 tablets 3 times daily for initial three days, and half reduced doses--for the subsequent four days; codelac was administered in 70 patients who were given 1 tablet 3 times daily for the entire treatment period (7 days). Primary efficacy endpoints were time to cough resolution and reduction in the severity of the cough (scored using a Cough Severity Scale). One patient in Rengalin group and three patients in Codelac group were withdrawn from the study. The article presents treatment outcomes obtained for 139 participants who completed the study in accordance with the protocol (Per Protokol-analysis). The data analysis was based on a non-inferiority (or comparability) statistical design for efficacy endpoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The antitussive effect of rengalin was significantly comparable (p < 0.025) with that of codelac; the time to complete resolution of cough (both daytime and nocturnal) was 7.2 ± 1.0 days (versus 7.0 ± 1.1 in the group of codelac). Rengalin's efficacy was evidenced by a sufficiently reduced cough severity in the initial few days after treatment onset. As a result of the entire 7-day treatment, the severity score was reduced by 3.1 ± 09 (versus 3.1 ± 1.0 in the group of codelac; p < 0.05), totaling 0.2 ± 0.5 point in both groups at the end of the administration period. The frequent non-productive/dry cough was fully resolved in 76% of patients. All the participants in Rengalin group achieved either convalescent outcomes or significant improvement; none of the patients developed secondary bacterial complications. Positive changes in the patients' state over the week were finally confirmed by evaluating the total quality of life scores, including physical and mental component scores (SF-36 questionnaire), and total sleep quality scores, which were comparative between patients treated with rengalin and codelac (p < 0.025). At the end of the administration period, the effect of rengalin was rated by the physician investigators as 'pronounced'. The Clinical Global Impression Scale-Efficacy Indices (CGI-EI) in the groups of rengalin and codelac were comparable, equating a score of 3.7 ± 0.5 (p < 0.025). The safety outcomes of rengalin treatment were assessed across all 143 randomized patients. The drug's high safety profile was confirmed by the absence of adverse events that could be reliably related to the study treatment, and by monitoring of laboratory variables. Rengalin demonstrated good tolerability and favorable compatibility with other medications for URIs with concomitant pathology. The patients showed 100% treatment compliance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rengalin is a new efficacious and safe drug indicated for the treatment of URI-induced cough. The severity of daytime and nocturnal cough begins to decrease as soon as on the first day after rengalin administration, with severity reduction observed throughout the whole treatment period. At the completion of the 7-day administration, cough severity is reduced by almost 100% and its changes are comparable with the outcomes of treatment with codelac. By targeting various cough reflex mediators, rengalin enables achieving an antitussive effect in the early days after URI onset (in dry, irritative cough episodes), and a protussive effect at later points of treatment. Rengalin promotes resolution of URI-induced cough without development of secondary bacterial complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":53646,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiya","volume":"60 1-2","pages":"19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: Rengalin is a release-active combination antitussive drug based on antibodies to bradykinin, to histamine and morphine. It acts at various mechanisms of cough reflex by modifying endogenous target molecules and their interaction with receptors. The drug's efficacy, as demonstrated previously in experimental and clinical studies, is mediated by specific release-activity obtained as a result of the production process.

Methods: Efficacy and safety assessment of rengalin in the treatment of cough induced by acute upper respiratory tract infections (URIs) in comparison with a complex codeine-containing drug (codelac) was performed as part of a multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 143 patients. All the participants presented with dry/non-productive cough caused by URIs (pharyngitis, laryngitis, tracheitis, tracheobronchitis, bronchitis). The duration of cough varied between 12 hours and 7 days. Rengalin was administered in 73 patients receiving 2 tablets 3 times daily for initial three days, and half reduced doses--for the subsequent four days; codelac was administered in 70 patients who were given 1 tablet 3 times daily for the entire treatment period (7 days). Primary efficacy endpoints were time to cough resolution and reduction in the severity of the cough (scored using a Cough Severity Scale). One patient in Rengalin group and three patients in Codelac group were withdrawn from the study. The article presents treatment outcomes obtained for 139 participants who completed the study in accordance with the protocol (Per Protokol-analysis). The data analysis was based on a non-inferiority (or comparability) statistical design for efficacy endpoints.

Results: The antitussive effect of rengalin was significantly comparable (p < 0.025) with that of codelac; the time to complete resolution of cough (both daytime and nocturnal) was 7.2 ± 1.0 days (versus 7.0 ± 1.1 in the group of codelac). Rengalin's efficacy was evidenced by a sufficiently reduced cough severity in the initial few days after treatment onset. As a result of the entire 7-day treatment, the severity score was reduced by 3.1 ± 09 (versus 3.1 ± 1.0 in the group of codelac; p < 0.05), totaling 0.2 ± 0.5 point in both groups at the end of the administration period. The frequent non-productive/dry cough was fully resolved in 76% of patients. All the participants in Rengalin group achieved either convalescent outcomes or significant improvement; none of the patients developed secondary bacterial complications. Positive changes in the patients' state over the week were finally confirmed by evaluating the total quality of life scores, including physical and mental component scores (SF-36 questionnaire), and total sleep quality scores, which were comparative between patients treated with rengalin and codelac (p < 0.025). At the end of the administration period, the effect of rengalin was rated by the physician investigators as 'pronounced'. The Clinical Global Impression Scale-Efficacy Indices (CGI-EI) in the groups of rengalin and codelac were comparable, equating a score of 3.7 ± 0.5 (p < 0.025). The safety outcomes of rengalin treatment were assessed across all 143 randomized patients. The drug's high safety profile was confirmed by the absence of adverse events that could be reliably related to the study treatment, and by monitoring of laboratory variables. Rengalin demonstrated good tolerability and favorable compatibility with other medications for URIs with concomitant pathology. The patients showed 100% treatment compliance.

Conclusions: Rengalin is a new efficacious and safe drug indicated for the treatment of URI-induced cough. The severity of daytime and nocturnal cough begins to decrease as soon as on the first day after rengalin administration, with severity reduction observed throughout the whole treatment period. At the completion of the 7-day administration, cough severity is reduced by almost 100% and its changes are comparable with the outcomes of treatment with codelac. By targeting various cough reflex mediators, rengalin enables achieving an antitussive effect in the early days after URI onset (in dry, irritative cough episodes), and a protussive effect at later points of treatment. Rengalin promotes resolution of URI-induced cough without development of secondary bacterial complications.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种安全有效的新型止咳药——润加林。急性呼吸道感染患者的随机、比较、多中心临床试验结果
未标示:Rengalin是一种基于缓激肽、组胺和吗啡抗体的释放活性联合止咳药。它通过改变内源性靶分子及其与受体的相互作用,作用于咳嗽反射的各种机制。正如先前在实验和临床研究中所证明的那样,该药物的功效是由生产过程中获得的特定释放活性介导的。方法:在一项涉及143例患者的多中心随机临床试验中,对rengalin治疗急性上呼吸道感染(uri)引起的咳嗽的疗效和安全性进行了评估,并与含可待因的复合药物(codelac)进行了比较。所有参与者都表现出由尿道感染(咽炎、喉炎、气管炎、气管支气管炎、支气管炎)引起的干性/非生产性咳嗽。咳嗽持续时间从12小时到7天不等。73名患者服用Rengalin,最初3天每天3次,每次2片,随后4天减少一半剂量;70例患者服用Codelac,每次1片,每日3次,整个治疗期(7天)。主要疗效终点为止咳时间和咳嗽严重程度的降低(使用咳嗽严重程度量表评分)。Rengalin组1例,Codelac组3例患者退出研究。这篇文章介绍了139名按照方案(Per protocol -analysis)完成研究的参与者获得的治疗结果。数据分析基于疗效终点的非劣效性(或可比性)统计设计。结果:rengalin的止咳作用与codelac具有显著可比性(p < 0.025);咳嗽(白天和夜间)完全消退的时间为7.2±1.0天(codelac组为7.0±1.1天)。Rengalin的疗效在治疗开始后的最初几天内咳嗽严重程度得到充分降低。在整个7天的治疗中,严重程度评分降低了3.1±09分(codelac组为3.1±1.0分;P < 0.05),两组给药结束时总分均为0.2±0.5点。76%的患者完全消除了频繁的非生产性/干咳。Rengalin组所有受试者均达到康复结局或显著改善;所有患者均未出现继发性细菌并发症。通过评估总体生活质量评分,包括身体和精神成分评分(SF-36问卷)和总体睡眠质量评分,最终确认患者一周内状态的积极变化,这些评分在rengalin和codelac治疗的患者之间进行比较(p < 0.025)。在给药期结束时,rengalin的效果被医师调查员评为“明显”。rengalin组和codelac组的临床总体印象量表-疗效指数(CGI-EI)具有可比性,得分为3.7±0.5 (p < 0.025)。在所有143名随机患者中评估rengalin治疗的安全性结果。该药物的高安全性被证实为没有与研究治疗可靠相关的不良事件,并通过监测实验室变量。Rengalin表现出良好的耐受性和与其他药物的良好相容性,用于治疗伴有病理的尿路感染。患者治疗依从性100%。结论:Rengalin是治疗细菌性咳嗽的一种安全有效的新药。白天和夜间咳嗽的严重程度在给药后第一天就开始减轻,整个治疗期间都观察到严重程度的减轻。在7天给药结束时,咳嗽严重程度几乎降低了100%,其变化与codelac治疗的结果相当。通过靶向各种咳嗽反射介质,rengalin能够在URI发作后的早期(在干咳、刺激性咳嗽发作时)实现止咳效果,并在随后的治疗点实现渐进效果。Rengalin促进解决尿路感染引起的咳嗽,而不会产生继发性细菌并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiya
Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiya Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Modern Ideas about Vaccination of Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: the View of ACR Experts Dynamics of Reserve Antimicrobial Drug Consumption in Russian Hospitals: Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic Rationality of Cytoflavin Inclusion in the Treatment of Patients with Dermatological Pathology Comorbid with Mental Disorders Pharmacogenetic Markers of Favipiravir Safety in COVID-19 Treatment The Results of Preclinical Studies Assessing the Effect of Riamilovir on the Reproductive Function and Postnatal Growth of Offspring in Laboratory Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1